Direct answer in 30 seconds. If your marriage certificate is stuck after you have already applied, file an RTI to the State Public Information Officer, Office of the SDM or Registrar of Marriages in the district where you filed the application. Ask for the day-to-day status, witness-verification outcome, reason for delay, and the projected date of issue. The fee is Rs.10 and the reply is due in 30 days under section 7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Pooja and Ankit married under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 in a municipal council town in Haryana in November 2024. Within a week of the wedding they submitted their registration application to the office of the Registrar of Marriages (Urban) — the Executive Officer of the municipal council — along with the wedding invitation, photographs, age and address proof, and affidavits from three witnesses. The counter clerk gave them a receipt with an application number and told them the certificate would be ready in “about two weeks.”
Two weeks became two months. Then four months. By May 2025 the online status still read “under process.” When Pooja went to the counter, the answer changed each visit: first “witness verification pending,” then “file sent to SDM for delayed-registration approval,” then “the concerned clerk is on leave.” Nobody put anything in writing. Nobody gave her a date.
This is the moment most citizens give up, pay a tout, or simply do without the certificate. None of those is necessary. The certificate is a legal record the State has a duty to issue once a valid application is filed, and the Right to Information Act, 2005 gives Pooja a clean, cheap way to force a written answer out of the same office that is stalling her. This guide shows you exactly how, using only verified law and the real routes that work in 2026.
Marriage registration in India is governed by a mix of Central statutes and State rules. The two Central Acts you will meet most often are:
On top of these Central Acts, most States have their own compulsory-registration statutes built on the Supreme Court's direction in Smt. Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, (2006) 2 SCC 578, decided 14 February 2006. The Court directed that marriage registration be made compulsory for all citizens of all religions in their respective States, because registration has great evidentiary value for child custody, maintenance, inheritance, and prevention of child marriage and bigamy. The Court placed registration under Entry 30 (vital statistics) of the Concurrent List. States followed with their own Acts and rules — for example, the Haryana Compulsory Registration of Marriages Act, 2008, the Kerala Hindu Marriage Registration Rules, 1957, and Delhi's Compulsory Registration of Marriage Executive Order (F.1(12)/DC/MC/2014 dated 21 April 2014).
So where does the delay come from? Three places, mostly:
1. **Witness verification.** Registrars routinely send the witness affidavits to the local police or revenue official for "verification." There is no fixed statutory deadline for this verification in most State rules, so it sits in a tray. 2. **Delayed-registration approval.** If you apply for registration more than a set number of days after the wedding (often 90 days under State frameworks such as Haryana's), the file moves up to a senior officer — the **SDM as Additional District Registrar** for delays between 90 and 365 days, and the **Deputy Commissioner as Additional Chief Registrar** for delays beyond 365 days. Each escalation adds an invisible queue. 3. **Office inertia.** The certificate itself is just a printed extract from the Register. Once verification and approval are done, issue should take a day. The hold-up is almost never the printing; it is the file not moving.
Why this matters for your RTI. Your RTI is not asking the registrar to “make a certificate.” It is asking for the status of each internal step — verification, delayed-registration approval, the officer holding the file — so the office is forced to put on paper exactly where the file is and who is responsible. That written answer is usually what unblocks the certificate.
To ask a sharp question you need to know the flow. For a typical Hindu Marriage Act registration in a State with compulsory rules, the path is:
For a Special Marriage Act civil marriage, the flow is different and includes statutory waits that are not “delay”:
The Kerala rules set a registration report within 15 days of solemnization, extendable to 30, with District Registrar permission needed beyond that. Delhi's executive order contemplates issue within roughly 14 days of a complete application. These State-level service levels are the yardsticks you measure the delay against in your RTI.
Two things have changed the background to marriage registration in the last few years, and both affect what documents you carry — which in turn affects why your file may be stuck.
1. Birth certificate is now mandatory proof of date and place of birth for marriage registration. The Registration of Births and Deaths (Amendment) Act, 2023 (Act 20 of 2023), in force 1 October 2023, inserted section 17(3), which makes the birth certificate the mandatory proof of date and place of birth for several listed purposes — including “registration of a marriage” under section 17(3)(d). This mandatory-use clause applies to persons born on or after 1 October 2023 (the date of commencement); for persons born earlier, the birth certificate remains useful proof but is not the sole mandatory document. Even so, if you do not have a birth certificate, the registrar can lawfully ask for one, and an incomplete birth record is a common, legitimate reason for a file to pause. If your birth certificate itself is delayed, that is a separate RTI — see Birth certificate delay? RTI to municipal registrar. The 2023 amendment did not make marriage registration compulsory centrally; compulsory registration remains governed by your State law and the Seema v. Ashwani Kumar framework.
2. Aadhaar cannot be made compulsory for marriage registration. In Asif Iqbal v. PIO, 2016 SCC OnLine CIC 11301, decided 1 April 2016, the Central Information Commission (Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu) held against the Revenue Department, GNCTD, that Aadhaar is not compulsory for marriage registration, relying on the Supreme Court's interim order in Puttaswamy. The CIC directed widespread publicity, fixing the online Special Marriage Act application system (which had Aadhaar as the only ID option), and appointment of additional marriage officers. So if your file is stuck because the online portal demands Aadhaar and you do not want to use it, that is an unlawful ground for delay — quote Asif Iqbal in your RTI or first appeal.
The Law Commission of India, in its Report No. 270 of July 2017, had recommended compulsory central registration with a penalty of Rs.5 per day capped at Rs.100, but that recommendation has not been enacted. Do not cite it as law; it is a recommendation only.
This is a State RTI, because marriage registration is administered by State Governments and Marriage Officers under State rules. You will usually file a single application to the office where you submitted your registration application.
Step 1 — Identify the correct public authority.
Step 2 — Prepare your questions. Ask for specific, dated records, not vague “details.” Six strong questions:
Step 3 — Use the right form and fee.
Step 4 — Submit and keep proof. File by hand at the PIO's office and take a stamped receiving copy, or send by registered post and keep the acknowledgement, or file through your State's online RTI portal if one exists and save the registration number. Proof of submission is your protection if the reply is late.
Step 5 — Wait 30 days. The PIO must reply within 30 days under section 7(1) (48 hours where the information concerns the life or liberty of a person — marriage-certificate delays normally do not qualify, so 30 days is the clock). If the limit is exceeded, the information is free of charge under section 7(6).
You can draft and check your application with the tools at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html and verify the timeline at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/timeline-calculator-app.html .
RTI works because it has a built-in ladder. If the PIO ignores you or sends a vague reply, you do not stop.
You can check whether the reply you finally get is complete and lawful with the tool at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/pio-reply-checker-app.html , and prepare your first appeal with https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html .
Pooja and Ankit, Karnal district, Haryana.
Married under the Hindu Marriage Act on 12 November 2024 in a municipal council area. Applied to the Registrar of Marriages (Urban) — Executive Officer of the municipal council on 20 November 2024 (8 days after the wedding, within the normal window). Application no. HR-KNL-MC-2024-0457. Submitted wedding invitation, six photographs, Aadhaar and PAN of both parties, Class 10 mark sheets as age proof, address proof, and affidavits from three witnesses. Fee paid: Rs.100 as the State registration fee.
By May 2025 — six months later — no certificate. Online status: “under process.” Counter visits produced oral answers but nothing in writing.
RTI filed: On 28 May 2025, Pooja filed an RTI to the SPIO, Office of the SDM, Karnal, with the six questions above, fee Rs.10 by Indian Postal Order. Total RTI cost: Rs.12 (IPO plus registered post).
Outcome: On 25 June 2025 (day 28), the SPIO replied in writing: witness verification had been completed on 15 April 2025 but the file had then sat with the Registrar's office awaiting the registrar's signature; no delayed-registration approval was needed. The reply gave the projected issue date as 5 July 2025. Certificate was issued on 3 July 2025.
If the SPIO had not replied within 30 days, the next step would have been a First Appeal to the FAA (the SDM) within 30 days, and if that failed, a Second Appeal to the Haryana State Information Commission within 90 days, with a penalty exposure for the PIO of Rs.250 per day up to Rs.25,000 under section 20(1).
To The State Public Information Officer Office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate / Registrar of Marriages [District / Sub-division], [State] Subject: Application under section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Status of marriage-registration application no. [X] dated [Y] Sir/Madam, I, [your name], citizen of India, hereby request the following information under section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, in respect of my marriage-registration application no. [X] dated [Y] submitted to your office under the [Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, section 8 / Special Marriage Act, 1954 / State compulsory-registration law]: 1. The day-to-day status of application no. [X], including the date of receipt in your office and the present location of the file. 2. The status and date of witness verification, and the name and designation of the officer who conducted or is conducting the verification. 3. The specific reason for the delay in issuing the marriage certificate beyond the normal service period prescribed under the [State] rules, with the section or rule under which the file is held. 4. The name, designation, and office of the officer currently holding the file. 5. The projected date of issue of the marriage certificate and the steps remaining before issue. 6. If delayed-registration approval was required (application made more than 90 days after solemnization), the status of that approval, the date the file was sent for approval, and the name and designation of the approving authority. The information sought does not fall under any of the exemptions in section 8 or 9 of the Act. I affirm that I am a citizen of India. As the information sought is not exempt, I request that it be furnished within the period prescribed under section 7(1). I have paid the application fee of Rs.10 by [Indian Postal Order / cash against receipt / electronic payment, reference no. ... ]. If this application is required to be transferred to another public authority under section 6(3), I request that the transfer be made within five days and that I be informed accordingly. If the information is not furnished within 30 days, I reserve the right to file a First Appeal under section 19(1) and a Second Appeal under section 19(3), and to seek penalty under section 20(1) against the PIO for delay without reasonable cause. Date: [..] Place: [..] Signature: [..] Name and address: [..]
RTI is for getting information from a public authority, not for filing a fresh registration. You must first submit a registration application to the local Registrar of Marriages under section 8 of the Hindu Marriage Act (or your State's compulsory-registration law). Once you have an application number and it begins to stall, RTI is the tool to force the office to tell you, in writing, where the file is. For the broader registration how-to, see Marriage Registration Stuck or Rejected? RTI to the Sub-Registrar.
Yes. “Under process” without a date or reason is exactly the kind of non-answer RTI is built to break. File the RTI asking for the day-to-day status, the officer holding the file, and the projected date. The office will have to convert “under process” into a specific, dated explanation.
Insist on an alternate ID. In Asif Iqbal v. PIO, 2016 SCC OnLine CIC 11301, the Central Information Commission held that Aadhaar is not compulsory for marriage registration. If the portal or the counter refuses any other ID, file the RTI and, if needed, a first appeal quoting this order. For related post-marriage name and ID issues, see aadhaar-name-correction-rejected-marriage-divorce.
The 30-day period after notice publication is the statutory objection window under section 7 — it is not delay. The delay becomes real only after the objection window closes with no valid objection and the Certificate of Marriage under section 13 is still not entered. Also remember section 14: if the marriage is not solemnized within 3 calendar months of the notice, the notice lapses and a fresh notice is required. File RTI only for inaction after these statutory waits.
File to the office where you submitted the registration application — usually the SDM or Registrar of Marriages of the district or sub-division. Marriage registration is a State subject; the district court is not the registration authority. If you file to the wrong office, section 6(3) requires transfer to the correct one within five days.
The fee is Rs.10 under the RTI Rules, 2012, Rule 3, payable by cash, Indian Postal Order, demand draft, banker's cheque, or electronic means to the Accounts Officer. State fees are mostly the same; check RTI Fees by State and Online Portal Directory (2026) for your State. BPL applicants are exempt from the fee on producing the BPL certificate (Rule 5).
After 30 days under section 7(1), file a First Appeal under section 19(1) with the FAA (a senior officer in the same department) within 30 days. If the FAA also fails, file a Second Appeal to the State Information Commission under section 19(3) within 90 days. You can also file a complaint under section 18. A PIO who delays without reasonable cause faces a penalty of Rs.250 per day up to Rs.25,000 under section 20(1). Prepare your appeal with https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html .
There is no single verified national marriage-registration portal. Most States run their own online registration systems through the revenue or local-government department. Check your State's revenue or urban-affairs department website, note the application number shown there, and quote that number in your RTI. Do not rely on a third-party “national” site.
No. Section 8(5) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 expressly says that non-registration does not invalidate a Hindu marriage. Registration is evidentiary. But because the Supreme Court in Seema v. Ashwani Kumar (2006) directed compulsory registration across all States, and because a certificate is needed for visa, insurance, maintenance, and inheritance purposes, you should still register and use RTI if the certificate is delayed.
Last reviewed: 4 July 2026.