Table of Contents
ACR / APAR grading — RTI for own copy + representation
Direct answer. File RTI to Reviewing / Accepting Authority. Ask for my ACR/APAR copy, representation disposal, grading-distribution for cohort.
Legal framework
- DoPT ACR Rules 2011 — communication of grading mandatory.
- Dev Dutt v. UoI (SC 2008) — adverse remarks communication.
5 questions to ask
- My ACR/APAR for last 5 years.
- Representation disposal.
- Cohort grading distribution (anonymised).
- Reviewing-authority remarks.
- Evaluator pattern.
Template
To: The Public Information Officer, Reviewing / Accepting Authority Subject: Application under §6 RTI Act 2005 — ACR/APAR copy My ACR/APAR for FY [..]-[..] — please furnish (1) copy, (2) representation disposal, (3) cohort distribution, (4) reviewing remarks, (5) evaluator pattern. Fee: Rs.10 by IPO/cash.
Common mistakes
- Forgetting to invoke Dev Dutt v. UoI.
- Skipping representation if “good” — even good grading can be revised; RTI lets you track.
Case law anchors
- Dev Dutt v. UoI (2008) 8 SCC 725 — “good” grading is adverse; must be communicated.
- Sukhdev Singh v. UoI (Del HC 2013) — representation framework.
Pro tips
- Pair with DoPT Master Circular.
- Unionise for cohort pattern.
FAQ
- Q: No ACR communicated — valid promotion denial? No per Dev Dutt — challengeable.
- Q: Mid-year change of reporting officer? RTI for handover entry.
Related reading
Sources
- DoPT ACR Rules 2011. Dev Dutt v. UoI (2008).
Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.