Quick Reply: File an NPS complaint through CGMS at Level 1 with a 30-day TAT, then escalate to NPS Trust, the PFRDA Ombudsman and finally SAT under the 2015 Regulations.
If your NPS contribution, withdrawal or account issue is not fixed, lodge a Level 1 grievance through the Central Grievance Management System (CGMS) on your CRA portal, then climb a five-level PFRDA escalation ladder up to the Securities Appellate Tribunal. Grievances under the National Pension System (NPS) and the Atal Pension Yojana (APY) are handled under the PFRDA (Redressal of Subscriber Grievance) Regulations, 2015, which set a defined Turn Around Time (TAT) at each stage so a complaint cannot be left open indefinitely.
| Level | Who handles it | Time limit (TAT) |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Intermediary or nodal office, through CGMS on your CRA portal, app or call centre | 30 days |
| Level 2 | National Pension System Trust (NPS Trust) | 21 days |
| Level 3 | Ombudsman appointed by PFRDA | As fixed by the Ombudsman under the 2015 Regulations |
| Level 4 | Designated Member of PFRDA, on a revision against the Ombudsman's award | As fixed under the 2015 Regulations |
| Level 5 | Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) | Per SAT rules of procedure |
Real-life example. Kashvi Pathak, a private-sector NPS subscriber in Pune, found that her March 2026 contribution of Rupee 5,000 was deducted but not reflected in her PRAN. On 2 April 2026 she lodged a Level 1 grievance through the Protean CRA portal under CGMS and saved the reference number. When there was no resolution by early May, she used the escalation option to take it to the NPS Trust at Level 2. The unit allotment was corrected within the 21-day window, and she did not need to reach the Ombudsman.
The PFRDA grievance ladder is the main and fastest route for an NPS complaint, so use CGMS first. RTI is a complementary tool, mainly for government-sector subscribers: if your employer deducted NPS but the contribution does not appear in your PRAN, you can file an RTI with the Public Information Officer (PIO) of your government nodal office or Drawing and Disbursing Officer (DDO) to obtain your contribution, deduction and upload records. Those records then strengthen your CGMS grievance and any escalation. Our AI RTI Drafter can prepare that letter, and The RTI Playbook explains the appeal route if the PIO does not reply.
In May 2026 PFRDA released an exposure draft that proposes changing the escalation matrix, including the role at Level 2 and the timelines. This is a proposal and is not yet notified, so the framework above, under the 2015 Regulations, remains the current law. Treat any shorter timelines or new bodies you read about as not yet in force until PFRDA notifies them.
At Level 1, through the Central Grievance Management System (CGMS) on your CRA web portal, mobile app or call centre. The concerned intermediary must resolve it within a 30-day TAT.
At Level 2, the NPS Trust has a TAT of 21 days from the date you escalate. You move there if Level 1 is not resolved within 30 days or the reply does not satisfy you.
The Ombudsman is appointed by PFRDA and sits at Level 3. You approach the Ombudsman if you are dissatisfied with the NPS Trust resolution or get no reply. A revision against the Ombudsman's award then lies to the Designated Member of PFRDA at Level 4.
If you are still dissatisfied with the Designated Member of PFRDA at Level 4, the final recourse is to the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) at Level 5.
Yes. A government-sector subscriber can file an RTI with the PIO of the nodal office or DDO to get contribution and upload records, which support the CGMS grievance. The AI RTI Drafter can draft it.
Related guides: