Meera Ganguly bought a washing machine listed at ₹48,000 on a six month no cost EMI and felt she had borrowed for free. The same shop was offering ₹2,200 off for a straight one shot payment on the same card. She did not get that ₹2,200. That was the interest, and she paid it.
Nothing in a no cost EMI is free. The interest exists. The only real questions are who hands it over, and whether anybody tells you. The Reserve Bank has an express rule on exactly this, and most people at a checkout have never heard of it.
Figures below are illustrative. They show the shape of the deal, not any bank rate. Yours is printed in your Most Important Terms and Conditions.
Six times ₹8,000 is ₹48,000, so the maths looks clean. It is clean. It is also not free. Principal ₹48,000, interest about ₹2,200, upfront discount about ₹2,200, net ₹48,000. Those middle lines are the ones the Reserve Bank says you must be shown.
| Structure | Who actually pays the interest | What it costs you | What should show on the statement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Merchant funded subsidy on a card EMI | The seller, as an upfront discount paid to the card issuer | The instant discount you would have received on a one shot payment | Principal, interest and the upfront discount, as separate lines |
| Price loaded, discount withheld | Nobody. The issuer charges no interest at all | The gap between the EMI price and the real cash price of the same item | Only the principal split into instalments, plus any fee and tax |
| Interest billed now, returned later | You do, first. It comes back as cashback or a credit | The float, plus the whole amount if you miss a refund condition | Interest as a normal line, with a separate credit in a later cycle |
There is a fourth route that is not a card at all. At many electronics counters the paperwork is a small consumer durable loan from a non banking financial company, with the seller paying a subvention. That is a loan in your name, with its own tenure, fee and credit bureau entry. For those loans the lender owes you a Key Facts Statement in a standard format, carrying a computation sheet of the annual percentage rate and the amortisation schedule, and that APR must take in all charges the lender levies. Credit card receivables are expressly carved out of the Key Facts Statement duty, which is why the two routes feel so different at the counter.
The operative words. Card issuers “shall ensure complete transparency in the conversion of credit card transactions to Equated Monthly Instalments (EMIs) by clearly indicating the principal, interest and upfront discount provided by the merchant/card-issuer (to make it no cost), prior to the conversion”. The same split “shall also be separately indicated in the credit card bill / statement”. Then the sentence that decides your argument: “EMI conversion with interest component shall not be camouflaged as zero-interest / no-cost EMI.”
Check the address before you quote it at anyone, because it moved. That wording first appeared in the Master Direction on Credit Card and Debit Card, Issuance and Conduct Directions, 2022. On 28 November 2025 the Reserve Bank restructured its rulebook entity by entity, and the 2022 Master Direction stands repealed for commercial banks. The live text now sits at paragraph 12 sub-paragraph 3 of the Reserve Bank of India (Commercial Banks - Credit Cards and Debit Cards: Issuance and Conduct) Directions, 2025, and at paragraph 13 sub-paragraph 3 of the matching Directions for non banking financial companies. The words did not change. Only the address did.
Two neighbours matter as much. Paragraph 23 requires the annualised percentage rate to be quoted for different situations and shown with equal prominence to the annual fee. Paragraph 76 says an issuer “shall not levy any charge that was not explicitly indicated to the cardholders at the time of issue of the card and without getting their explicit consent”, with an express exception for taxes later imposed by the Government.
The card Directions do not cap what an issuer may charge to foreclose an EMI. No rate, no ceiling, no waiver. What they do require is that the Most Important Terms and Conditions term sheet carry the fees and charges, and that the full list of charges sit on the card issuer website. So the governing document is your own schedule of charges, and the foreclosure line is worth reading before you convert, not after.
The trap is the arithmetic. On a merchant funded plan the discount was set against interest for the full tenure. Foreclose in month three and you can pay a charge on a benefit you have only half used. Letting a small no cost EMI run to the end is often cheaper.
This is where most complaints come from. A refund and an EMI are two different contracts. Sending the machine back reverses the purchase with the seller. It does not by itself cancel the instalment plan you agreed with the issuer, and instalments can keep landing until the conversion is separately cancelled.
What the Directions control is how the money lands. Any credit from a refund, a failed transaction or a reversal that arrives before the payment due date, on a bill you have not yet paid, must be adjusted immediately against the payment due and notified to you. If you have already paid and the credit exceeds one percent of your credit limit or ₹5,000, whichever is lower, the issuer must seek your explicit consent by email or SMS within seven days before parking it against your credit limit, and must reverse it to your bank account if you do not respond. Ask for the money in your bank account and the issuer has three working days.
So do two things the same day: get the return acknowledgement from the seller, and send the issuer a written request to cancel the EMI conversion and refund any charge already levied.
The Reserve Bank works this into its own illustration. On an outstanding of ₹10,000 at two percent a month, its example shows interest of ₹200 “along with tax and other charges of ₹50”, a figure it labels indicative. Tax sits on top of the interest, not inside it.
The word no cost covers the interest, not the tax that rides on it, and not the fees. Paragraph 76 points the same way, since it carves taxes later imposed by the Government out of the protection against undisclosed charges. So expect a tax line even on a plan sold as free. This page quotes no percentage, because rate schedules change and the figure that binds you is printed on your own statement.
The Right to Information Act, 2005 is a different lever, and it is worth being honest about its reach. Section 2 clause h defines a public authority, and a private card issuer is not one, so an RTI application will not produce your own EMI split. It is the right tool when the counterparty is a public authority and the record is administrative. Draft with the AI RTI Drafter, test a refusal against the PIO Reply Checker, count deadlines on the Timeline Tracker, and read the section text on the RTI Act, 2005 page. The full escalation ladder is in The RTI Playbook.
No. A genuine no cost EMI, where a merchant subsidy really does cancel the interest and the split is disclosed, is allowed. What is prohibited is dressing an EMI that carries an interest component as a zero interest or no cost EMI. Paragraph 12 sub-paragraph 3 of the 2025 Directions for commercial banks says it “shall not be camouflaged as zero-interest / no-cost EMI”.
Not automatically. Where interest is billed and refunded later, the interest line is expected and a matching credit should follow. It becomes a problem when no credit follows, or when you were never shown the principal, interest and upfront discount before converting and again on the bill.
Because the discount and the interest come out of the same pocket. If the seller is paying your interest to the card issuer, it has nothing left to hand you upfront. Comparing the EMI price against the discounted cash price is the most useful thing you can do at a checkout.
Yes, if it was disclosed. Paragraph 76 of the 2025 Directions bars any charge that was not explicitly indicated at the time the card was issued and without your explicit consent, and the Most Important Terms and Conditions term sheet has to list fees and charges. The words no cost describe the interest, not the fee.
Because the refund and the instalment plan are separate. The refund reverses the purchase with the seller. Cancelling the conversion is a separate instruction to the card issuer, and it has to be in writing. Any credit arriving before your due date on an unpaid bill must be adjusted straight against the payment due and notified to you, and on request the issuer must move the money to your bank account within three working days.
Tax rides on the interest and on the fees, and the word free does not waive it. The RBI illustration itself shows tax and other charges added on top of interest. Read the tax line on your own statement rather than trusting a rate quoted online.