Quick Reply: CGL 2026 runs on two tiers — Tier-I shortlists, Tier-II decides merit. The fee is ₹100 (women, SC, ST, PwBD and eligible ex-servicemen pay nothing), the answer-key challenge costs ₹100 per question, non-refundable, and para 13.7 of the notice rules out re-evaluation or re-checking of scores at any tier. What still works: RTI for the records behind your result. Helpdesk: 1800 309 3063.
Notice: ssc.gov.in — Combined Graduate Level 2026
Fee: ₹100; exempt for women, SC, ST, PwBD, eligible ESM
Answer-key challenge: ₹100 per question, non-refundable
Re-evaluation: none, at any tier — notice para 13.7
Merit: Tier-II performance only — notice para 16.6
Helpdesk: 1800 309 3063, toll free
Every CGL cycle floods RTI forums with the same three questions: why did my Tier-I score drop after normalization, where did my Tier-II marks go, and can I get the sheet re-checked. The 2026 notice answers the third in advance — no. That makes the drafting matter more, not less: you cannot ask for marks to change, but you can ask for every record that produced them.
Read that list as a map of what is closed and what is open. Re-checking: closed. Answer-key challenge: open, priced, time-boxed. Everything documentary — normalization, cut-offs, question-wise keys, your response sheet: open, and that is RTI territory.
1. Copy of my normalized score and raw score, Tier-I, Roll No. ____, with the normalization formula applied to my shift. 2. The final answer key of the shift I appeared in, and the questions dropped, if any, with reasons. 3. Category-wise cut-off marks applied to shortlist candidates for Tier-II, and the number shortlisted in my category. 4. Copy of my Tier-II response sheet and question-wise marks awarded, Roll No. ____. 5. The number of answer-key representations received for question ____ of my shift, and how many were upheld.
Point 5 is the quiet weapon: it goes to whether the key you were marked on survived scrutiny. Point 1, asked with the formula, usually settles the normalization grievance — most score drops after normalization are arithmetic, not malice, and seeing the shift statistics proves it either way.
Para 13.7 bars re-evaluation — it does not bar access. Evaluated answer sheets of public examinations are “information” under §2(f), as the Supreme Court held in CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (2011). SSC's own practice of selling candidate response sheets during the answer-key window is a subset of the right; the RTI route reaches the rest — question-wise marks, moderation records, key-revision files. Frame every point as a document, never as a plea.
Real example. Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak missed a Tier-II shortlist by 0.4 marks. No re-checking lay, so he filed for the category cut-off, the number shortlisted, and his normalized-versus-raw score with the shift statistics. The reply showed a dropped question had shifted the cut-off, and his score arithmetic was clean — closure in 24 days, and a template he has reused since.
No. Notice para 13.7 for CGL 2026 excludes re-evaluation and re-checking at every tier. Use the answer-key window and RTI for the records.
No — ₹100 per question, non-refundable, even when the representation is upheld.
Women candidates and SC, ST, PwBD candidates, plus ex-servicemen eligible for reservation — notice para 10.2.
No. Tier-I shortlists; the final selection is on overall Tier-II performance.
1800 309 3063, the notice's toll-free helpline, for registration and exam-process issues — not for marks disputes.
Last reviewed: 26 August 2026. Every rule cited is from the CGL 2026 Notice of Examination text published on ssc.gov.in.