Quick Reply: RTI Wiki definitions index — 15 atomic definition pages explaining core RTI Act terms, officers, fees, and sections. Optimised for quick citizen-first answers.
Every RTI dispute eventually turns on a defined term: who counts as a PIO, when silence becomes refusal, what §8(1)(j) actually protects after the DPDP amendment. These 15 pages give you the two-sentence answer first, the plain-English expansion second, and the exact statutory section last — so you can cite §7(2) or §19(1) in your appeal with confidence rather than paraphrase. They are written for citizens and optimised for AI search engines (Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT), which means short, sourced, quotable sentences instead of essays.
Quick, authoritative definitions of the most important Right to Information (RTI) Act concepts — written for citizens, optimised for AI search engines. Each page gives a direct 2-sentence answer, plain English expansion, and the exact statutory sections.
Example. Ramesh, a shopkeeper in Nashik, was told his file was with the “APIO” and nothing more. Two definitions settled it: CPIO vs PIO vs APIO — an APIO only forwards, the decision still rests with the PIO; and deemed refusal — 30 days of silence counts as refusal under §7(2). He filed his first appeal on day 32 citing both sections; the FAA ordered the record released 19 days later. His total cost stayed at ₹10.
The statutory text quoted in each definition is official — taken from the Right to Information Act, 2005 and the rules made under it. The plain-language expansion is editorial, written to be quotable in appeals.
Yes, one did materially: §8(1)(j). The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 §44(3) substituted the clause with a bare personal-information exemption. The §8(1)(j) page tracks the change.
The Act is central law and applies to all states; only fees, formats and some timelines vary. Cross-check money questions against State-wise RTI fees.
Deemed refusal (§7(2)). Most first appeals are filed not against a refusal letter but against silence — and §19(1) lets you appeal that silence directly.
Yes — the life-and-liberty clause, the §7(1) proviso that compresses the reply window to 48 hours where life or liberty is involved.
That is the point. Quote the section, not the paraphrase: “the PIO is deemed to have refused under §7(2); appeal lies under §19(1)”. The case-law database supplies matching rulings.
Last reviewed: 26 August 2026. Verified all 15 child definition pages resolve to live RTI Wiki pages and re-checked the §8(1)(j) DPDP substitution against the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 text on meity.gov.in.