Quick Reply: The Decoded series has been integrated into /explanations. This page redirects to the active, maintained explanations of the RTI Act, 2005.
The Decoded series set out to do one thing well: take each section of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and pair the statutory text with its plain-language meaning and one illustrative decision. That format now lives inside the Common Terms and Explanations hub and the per-section Act pages, which are maintained more often than this namespace ever was. Nothing was deleted — every section mapped below still has a home, and the guides now go further than the originals, adding case-law anchors, common PIO errors and citable ratio sentences.
This series is now part of Explanations. The Decoded walk-through of the RTI Act — statutory text + plain-language meaning + an illustrative decision for each section — has been consolidated into our Common Terms and Explanations hub and the dedicated per-section articles. You will find the same content, better maintained, under the links below.
The “statute + plain-language + one illustrative decision” approach has been absorbed into the PIO / FAA framework articles, which go further — adding case-law anchors (Supreme Court + High Court), common PIO errors, citable ratio sentences, and links to the filing tools.
Start points:
If you specifically need the “section + statutory text + one example” format that Decoded aimed for, you can reconstruct it from the Act pages and the FAQ in under five clicks:
Example. Anita, a homemaker in Solan, had her RTI refused under §8(1)(d) (“commercial confidence”). She opened grounds for rejection, found that §8(2) can still override the exemption when public interest is larger, checked two High Court rulings in the case-law database, and filed her first appeal within 30 days using the First Appeal Builder. The FAA ordered disclosure of the contract clauses; total cost of the whole fight: the original ₹10 fee.
Nowhere. They were merged, section by section, into the Explanations hub, the per-section Act pages and the PIO / FAA Knowledge Base. Every statutory idea covered before is still covered.
Start with Grounds for RTI rejection — it maps all ten §8(1) clauses, §9, §11 and §24, then explains the §8(2) public-interest override and §10 severability.
§7 sets the 30-day clock, and §7(1) proviso compresses it to 48 hours where life or liberty is involved. §7(2) deemed refusal explains what silence means: after 30 days, no reply is a refusal you can appeal.
That is §10 severability — exempt bits are severed, the rest must be given. FAA severance powers covers what an appellate authority can do about over-redaction.
Yes. 10 landmark CIC decisions and the historical CIC orders archive carry the illustrative rulings, and each explanation page links the leading case for its clause.
The Act applies nationwide; fees and appeal formats vary by state. See State-wise RTI fees before you attach your fee, and the RTI FAQ for the common variations.
Last reviewed: 27 August 2026. All 28 child links re-verified live (origin HTTP check of every section, explanation, case and tool target).