Karnail Singh v. State of Punjab (Punjab & Haryana High Court, 2024-04-03) CWP/2024/006789 is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section PMAY-G. PMAY-G subsidy delay 18+ months attracts 9% interest p.a. Where PMAY-G subsidy installments were delayed by more than 18 months without satisfactory explanation, the Court directed payment of the outstanding amount with 9% per annum simple interest.
PMAY-G subsidy delay 18+ months attracts 9% interest p.a.
Where PMAY-G subsidy installments were delayed by more than 18 months without satisfactory explanation, the Court directed payment of the outstanding amount with 9% per annum simple interest. Citizen Charter timelines are enforceable obligations.
Compensation framework for delayed welfare payments.
This ruling is part of the 300+ case-law corpus at RTI Wiki Case-law Database. Every named case sets a precedent that you can cite in your own §19(1) First Appeal or §19(3) Second Appeal. Information Commissions and FAAs are bound to consider properly cited authority.
Use our Citation Formatter to format the citation correctly. Pair with Bhagat Singh v. CIC (2007) (procedural objections) and Adesh Kumar v. UoI (2014) (irrelevance is not a ground) — these two Delhi HC rulings cover most everyday refusal scenarios.