Central Information Commission · 2022-01-01 · Citation awaited
IIT faculty recruitment: criteria + own evaluation disclosable; panel deliberation §8(1)(e).
| Court | Central Information Commission |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2022-01-01 |
| Citation | Citation awaited |
| Petitioner | Candidate |
| Respondent | IIT Bombay |
| RTI Act sections | §8(1)(e) |
| Outcome | Partly allowed |
IIT faculty recruitment — published criteria + candidate's own evaluation disclosable; panel deliberations §8(1)(e).
IITs are §2(h) public authorities. Faculty recruitment — published eligibility criteria, post-wise vacancy, successful candidate's profile after final selection — is disclosable. Selection-panel internal deliberations on comparative merit remain §8(1)(e) protected narrowly.
IIT, faculty recruitment, §8(1)(e), CIC
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.