Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- rules:sc [2015/09/05 05:57] – [Downloads] Shrawan
+++ rules:sc [2018/03/06 15:06] (current) – Shrawan
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-====== Supreme Court of India ======
+====== Supreme Court of India RTI Rules ======
 {{tag>Court Rules}}
 {{:rules:supreme_court_of_india_-_200705.jpg?460|Supreme Court of India (Source: Wikipedia commons) Photo: Legaleagle86)}}
@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 <blockquote>Note : Court fee and cheques are not acceptable as the same are not valid mode as per rules.</blockquote>
 ===== Downloads =====
+<html>
+<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
+<ins class="adsbygoogle"
+     style="display:block; text-align:center;"
+     data-ad-layout="in-article"
+     data-ad-format="fluid"
+     data-ad-client="ca-pub-3082882621726443"
+     data-ad-slot="9529004960"></ins>
+<script>
+     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
+</script>
+</html>
   - {{:rules:supreme_court_rules_1966.pdf|The Supreme Court Rules 1966}}
   - {{:downloads:act:rules:andhrapradesh:rtiact-hindi.pdf|RTI Act in Hindi}}
@@ Line 53: / Line 65: @@
   - [[http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/pendingstat.htm|Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases.]]
-Analysis of Supreme Court RTI Rules and Procedure
+===== Analysis of Supreme Court RTI Rules and Procedure =====
   - the applicant who sought this information in 2009 had to wait until 2014 just to get the Delhi High Court to rule that the SC may provide the information. Read the decision [[http://www.cic.gov.in/HC-Rulings/HighCourtJudgementdt.04.12.2004caseSCregistryVsCommodorelokeshBatra.pdf|here]]!
   - On 10th November 2007, Subhash Chandra Agrawal filed an RTI request with the SC asking for information concerning declaration of assets by Supreme Court Judges, among other things. The PIO denied the request, claiming he did not hold the information. Agrawal filed a first appeal asking that his application may be transferred to the Public Authority holding the information. The Registrar asked the PIO to re-consider the request, but he denied the information again. Agrawal moved the Central Information Commission (CIC) which in January 2009, asked the PIO to furnish the information [PDF].The SC challenged this order twice before the Delhi High Court (HC) even as it made some information about judges’ assets public on its website, but the HC upheld the CIC’s ruling. Read the decision [[http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/FB-06012009-01.pdf|here]]!