Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- important-decisions:cic-case-laws:shri-nihar-ranjan-banerjee-cvo-and-shri-bidya-nand-mishra-dgm-vig-coal-india-ltd-vs-shri-mn-ghosh [2018/09/12 15:19] – [Authors] Shrawan
+++ important-decisions:cic-case-laws:shri-nihar-ranjan-banerjee-cvo-and-shri-bidya-nand-mishra-dgm-vig-coal-india-ltd-vs-shri-mn-ghosh [2023/04/15 11:53] (current) – Shrawan
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
   - Apex Court in Patel Narshi Thakershi & Ors. Vs. Pradyumanshighji Arjunsinghji((Apex Court in Patel Narshi Thakershi & Ors. Vs. Pradyumanshighji Arjunsinghji ⎯ (AIR 1970 SC 1273)))and
   - Rajendra Singh Vs. Governor, Andaman & Nicobar Islands & Ors.((Rajendra Singh Vs. Governor, Andaman & Nicobar Islands & Ors. AIR 2006 SC 75 AIR 2006 SC 75))
-<html>
-<script async src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
-<ins class="adsbygoogle"
-     style="display:block; text-align:center;"
-     data-ad-layout="in-article"
-     data-ad-format="fluid"
-     data-ad-client="ca-pub-3082882621726443"
-     data-ad-slot="9529004960"></ins>
-<script>
-     (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
-</script>
-</html>
 As has been observed in the above case, the Central Information Commission has been assigned somewhat a unique role under the Right to Information Act, 2005.  The Commission is the last court of appeal, has the exclusive power to impose penalties on defaulting Public Information Officers, and also has a role of superintendence and direction of the information regime.  It can direct public authorities to take specific actions to promote the Right to Information.  Given these facts, to argue that the power of review does not inhere in the nature of the CIC, itself would give scope to recurring miscarriage of justice wherever the CIC may be in error.  The power to correct through review, therefore, **is germane to promoting justice and to preventing its miscarriage**.