File Notings under RTI: Current Disclosure Guide 2026

The notesheet is often where a public authority records how a proposal moved, what objections were raised and who approved the final action. RTI gives access to information held by or under the control of a public authority; it does not create a blanket “internal document” exemption. At the same time, every line is not automatically public. Security, privilege, fiduciary, investigation, personal-information and other statutory exemptions must be assessed against the actual content.

The RTI Act’s definitions work together:

1. Section 2(f) includes records, documents, memos, emails, opinions and advice within “information”.
2. Section 2(i) includes a file within “record”.
3. Section 2(j) includes inspection of records and taking notes, extracts or certified copies within the right to information.

DoPT removed the practical ambiguity in Office Memorandum No. 1/20/2009-IR dated 23 June 2009: “file noting can be disclosed except file noting containing information exempt from disclosure under section 8 of the Act.” That is the safest official starting point. Do not rely on an old website FAQ saying all notings are secret or on a summary claiming all notings must be disclosed unredacted.

“Why did you reject me?” can invite the answer that RTI does not require a new explanation. Ask for the existing decision trail instead:

• complete notesheet/noting portion of the identified file;
• correspondence portion, including referenced letters and emails;
• movement register or electronic workflow history;
• approval, rejection or sanction recorded on file;
• committee minutes or reports actually relied on;
• record-retention or weeding entry if the file is said not to exist; and
• certified copies or inspection under section 2(j).

Identify the subject, file number, date range, application/order number and office. A bounded request is easier to search and harder to misread.

Subject: Certified copies and inspection of the file record for [matter]

1. Provide a certified copy of the complete notesheet/noting portion of
file no. [number] concerning [subject], from [date] to [date].

2. Provide certified copies of the correspondence, reports, approvals and
orders referred to in those notes.

3. Provide the available file-movement/e-office transaction history showing
dates and sections through which the file moved.

4. If the record is voluminous, permit inspection under section 2(j) and,
after inspection, provide certified copies of the pages identified by me.

5. If any portion is withheld, apply section 10 to sever only the exempt
portion and disclose the remainder. For each redaction, communicate the
exact exemption and reasons required by section 7(8), along with appeal
particulars.

Do not ask the PIO to certify that a decision was fair, lawful or motivated. Those are conclusions. Ask for the material that lets you assess them.

This point changed after many older RTI guides were written. Section 44(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 substituted RTI section 8(1)(j), and the commencement notification brought that amendment into force on 13 November 2025. The current clause covers “information which relates to personal information”.

That change does not turn an entire file into personal information. The PIO must identify the information being withheld, consider the rest of the Act and disclose reasonably severable non-exempt material under section 10. Section 8(2)’s public-interest override also remains in the Act. Because current case law and application of the amended clause may develop, an appeal should focus on the specific record, official function, necessity of each redaction and availability of severance—not repeat pre-amendment wording as if it were still current.

• security, strategic or protected State interests under section 8(1)(a);
• court-forbidden or contempt-related information under section 8(1)(b);
• legislative privilege under section 8(1)©;
• commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property under section 8(1)(d), subject to its public-interest language;
• fiduciary information under section 8(1)(e), subject to its public-interest language;
• information received in confidence from a foreign government under section 8(1)(f);
• safety and confidential-source concerns under section 8(1)(g);
• investigation or prosecution impediment under section 8(1)(h);
• Cabinet-paper protection under section 8(1)(i), with its proviso; and
• personal information under current section 8(1)(j).

The PIO should connect the clause to the requested content. A file’s label—“confidential”, “vigilance”, “legal” or “internal”—is not by itself an RTI exemption.

Section 10 allows access to the portion of a record that does not contain exempt information and can reasonably be severed. Ask for page-level disclosure with limited redactions rather than accepting a whole-file refusal. The section 10 notice should communicate the decision, reasons, decision-maker details, fee and review rights specified by the provision.

For example, a welfare-benefit file may contain a third person’s phone number beside the department’s eligibility analysis. Redacting the phone number need not erase the official reasoning. Whether a particular name, signature or opinion is disclosable depends on the current law and context; avoid a universal claim.

Inspection is useful when you do not know the page numbers or the authority says hundreds of pages are involved. Ask for the file index and an inspection appointment, then identify the pages for certified copies. Record missing page numbers, gaps between notes, unreferenced enclosures or an absent approval during inspection.

Do not alter, mark or remove the file. Take notes according to the office procedure and request certified copies of selected pages. If electronic records exist, ask what export or printout the authority can provide in the form held.

File a first appeal under section 19(1) when the PIO treats file notings as automatically exempt, gives no item-wise decision, omits appeal particulars, or refuses the whole file without considering section 10. Quote the 23 June 2009 DoPT clarification and the relevant definitions, then address the exact exemption actually cited.

Ask the FAA to apply section 19(5), under which the burden of justifying denial rests on the PIO. Seek a reasoned, item-wise order and free supply under section 7(6) if the statutory reply time was missed. If records are said to be missing, seek the retention schedule, search record and action taken on loss; RTI cannot recreate a destroyed record.

No. They are not exempt as a class, but particular content may be withheld under a valid section 8 or section 9 ground. Non-exempt portions should be considered for severance.

“Internal” is not a listed exemption. The PIO must identify and justify an applicable statutory provision.

Ask for the existing notesheet, scrutiny report, approval and rejection order. RTI provides held information; it does not require a new opinion.

Section 2(j) includes inspection of records, subject to the Act and reasonable arrangements. Inspection is especially useful for a large or poorly indexed file.

Yes, where current section 8(1)(j) applies. But the authority should still examine severance, other statutory provisions and any properly raised public-interest issue.

No. It is a procedure for representation in its field of application. The PIO must make the disclosure decision under the Act.

Ask for the applicable retention schedule, weeding order/register entry and search record. RTI cannot restore a record that was lawfully destroyed, but the existing destruction trail is itself requestable subject to the Act.

Request section 10 severance: redact the protected part and provide the reasonably separable remainder with a proper notice and appeal rights.

• Legislative Department — Right to Information Act, 2005
• DoPT compilation — Office Memorandum No. 1/20/2009-IR on file notings
• DoPT — official guide on the Right to Information Act
• MeitY — DPDP Act commencement notification, 13 November 2025
• India Code — Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023; see section 44(3)

• What counts as information under RTI
• Severability under section 10
• Procedure for inspection under RTI
• First RTI template
• First appeal template
• The RTI Playbook

Return to RTI Wiki home.