TL;DR. CPGRAMS is for grievance redressal — “fix my problem” (delayed pension, broken streetlight, lost passport file). RTI is for information — “tell me what happened, who decided, when”. Filing the wrong one wastes time. Often, file both for maximum pressure.
| Aspect | RTI | CPGRAMS |
| Statutory backing | RTI Act 2005 | DARPG resolution |
| Goal | Get information | Get action |
| Reply guarantee | 30 days §7(1) | “reasonable time” (no statutory deadline) |
| Cost | Rs 10 | Free |
| Forum | PIO / FAA / CIC/SIC | Department officer / nodal officer |
| Penalty teeth | §20 — Rs 250/day on PIO | Closure rate metric only |
| Best for | Investigation, paper-trail, accountability | Routine service delivery |
File both the same day:
When the RTI reply comes, you have institutional facts. When CPGRAMS closure comes, you have action. Combined: action + accountability.
Both options are tools — pick based on what you're trying to achieve:
A citizen with a stuck pension claim filed:
The CPGRAMS got the pension paid. The RTI gave the paper trail. The Lokayukta complaint led to disciplinary action against the responsible officer. Three tools, one outcome.
Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.
More comparisons: browse every RTI-vs-alternative side-by-side in RTI vs Alternatives: the full comparison hub <!– rti-wiki-comparisons-hub-2026-vs-start –>