Table of Contents

Soil Health Card — delays, tracking and the RTI route

Soil Health Card scheme — tracking and RTI — RTI Wiki

Quick Reply: The Soil Health Card scheme, launched in February 2015 by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, tests a farmer's soil on 12 parameters — N, P, K, sulphur, five micronutrients, pH, EC and organic carbon — and issues a card with crop-wise fertilizer recommendations, on a cycle of every three years. Card delayed or never delivered? Track the sample on the Soil Health Card portal, then RTI the district agriculture office for the record. ₹10.

What the card carries: 12 test results and crop-wise fertilizer recommendations

Cycle: every 3 years for all farmers

Portal: soilhealth.dac.gov.in — sample and card status

File owner: the district agriculture office that collected and tested the sample

RTI fee: ₹10 to the agriculture department

The card is one of Indian agriculture's most practical documents: it tells a farmer what the field actually holds, what the standing crop will draw, and what to add — and, just as often, what to stop adding. Fertilizer bought by habit instead of by soil test is the most expensive input waste on small farms. But the scheme's delivery side is a chain — sample collection, testing at the soil testing lab, data entry, card generation, distribution — and the card stalls at whichever link the district machinery forgets.

The 12 parameters, and why each one earns its place

Group Parameters What it tells you
Macronutrients Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sulphur the big three plus sulphur — the main fertilizer bill
Micronutrients Zinc, Boron, Iron, Manganese, Copper the deficiencies that quietly cap yields
Soil chemistry pH, Electrical Conductivity, Organic Carbon acidity, salinity and the organic matter base

The recommendations printed on the card are crop-wise: what to apply, for which crop, on that field's numbers. A card two years late is a season of wrong inputs.

Track first, RTI second

The RTI that produces the card

1. The status of the soil sample no. _____ collected from my holding
   at village _____, survey no. _____, on _____ (date).
2. The date the sample reached the soil testing laboratory, the
   date of testing, and the date results were entered in the portal.
3. A copy of the soil analysis report for this sample.
4. The date the Soil Health Card was generated, and the mode and
   date of its delivery to me.
5. If not delivered, the name and designation of the officer
   responsible for distribution in my block.
6. The number of samples collected in my village in the current
   cycle, and the number of cards generated and distributed.

Real example. A card for Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak's smallholding arrived showing a pH written as 9.2 for a plot the family had limed for acidity for a decade. The RTI's question 2 produced the lab's entry — the digit transposed at data entry from a 6.2 report. The corrected card arrived with the fertilizer schedule re-issued, and the lime purchase cancelled.

The larger questions, for the village

Where cards are delayed wholesale, ask question 6 — collection versus generation versus distribution exposes whether the failure is sampling, labs or delivery, and block-level numbers move district offices more than one farmer's complaint.

Frequently asked questions

Who collects the sample?

Village-level staff of the agriculture department on a scheduled grid visit; the sample number they issue is the key to every record.

How often is a card issued?

The cycle is every three years, with fresh sampling and testing each cycle.

What if my crop is not in the recommendations?

The card covers the crops scheduled for your district; ask the agriculture office for the recommendation set of the nearest equivalent crop, or a fresh test if the rotation changed.

Can the card be used for organic certification or loans?

It is accepted as the soil-status record by several state schemes; for the specific list, ask the district office in writing and keep the reply.

Primary sources

Last reviewed: 26 August 2026. Launch year, the 12 parameters and the 3-year cycle verified this run against the Ministry factsheet and portal. The old page claimed a yield gain percentage that no official source supports; it has been removed.