Ramesh stays in a mid-sized city picked for the Smart Cities Mission a few years ago. Big promises were made: a command centre, smart roads, clean water kiosks, a complaint app. Today only half the work is visible. The local paper says “projects completed,” but Ramesh cannot find one clear list of what was spent in his ward. The municipal office says “ask the SPV.” The SPV says “check the website.” The website numbers do not match what his eyes see.
This is the gap the Right to Information Act fills. A Smart City project is built with public money, and the body running it is a public authority. By law, it must answer a citizen's written questions. This page shows, step by step, how to ask, where to send the letter, what fee to pay, and what to do if the answer does not come.
Direct answer. File one RTI to your Smart City SPV (the city-level company) and a second to MoHUA (the Union ministry). Ask for the project list, money spent, completion percentage, citizen-engagement records, and the ICCC (command centre) status. Fee is Rs 10. You should get a reply within 30 days.
The Smart Cities Mission was launched on 25 June 2015 to develop 100 cities. Cities were picked in rounds: 20 in January 2016, 40 between May and September 2016, 30 in June 2017, and the last 10 by June 2018 (9 in January, 1 in June).
Each chosen city got a special company to run the work, called the SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle). “SPV” means a company created for one narrow job — here, to plan, fund, build and run that city's smart projects. Each SPV is a Limited Company under the Companies Act, 2013. The state/UT and the city government (ULB) hold the shares 50:50. Central grants come in as a tied Grant Fund.
Because the government owns and funds the SPV, it is treated as a “government company” under Section 2(45) of the Companies Act 2013. (Section 2(45) says a government company is one in which not less than 51% of the paid-up share capital is held by the Central or State government.) And because it is government-funded, it is also a “public authority” under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act 2005 — which covers any body owned, controlled or substantially financed by the government. That is the legal hook that lets you file RTI to it. For a deeper look at this test, see what counts as a public authority under RTI.
Many older pages say “MoUD.” That name is now out of date. The old Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) was merged with the housing ministry and renamed Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) through a gazette notification (SO 2163(E)) dated 6 July 2017. So when you file RTI at the central level today, the correct name is MoHUA, not MoUD.
The mission deadline was extended three times: first to June 2023, then to 30 June 2024, and finally to 31 March 2025 for financial closure. From 2025-26 onward, no central funds have been allocated for the mission.
As of June 2025, about 8,067 projects (94% of the total) were completed at a cost of around Rs 1.64 lakh crore. The total central outlay was Rs 48,000 crore, and about 99.44% had been released. By December 2025, an RTI reply showed 31 cities fully transformed, 43 near completion, and 26 still needing time.
What happens after the deadline? MoHUA issued Advisory No. 27 (June 2025) directing that Smart City SPVs should be repurposed, not closed. They are to give tech support to city governments, help implement state and central schemes, do consulting and research, and help bring urban investment. States are to fund any leftover projects from their own resources. The ICCCs (Integrated Command and Control Centres — the city's real-time control rooms for traffic, disaster response, public safety and solid waste) are to be integrated with regular municipal work. ICCCs have already been set up in all 100 smart cities.
This means even after the mission “ends,” the SPV body still exists, still holds records, and is still answerable under RTI.
Step 1 — Decide who to ask. File two RTIs, not one. The first goes to the PIO of your city's Smart City SPV (it has the project-level detail). The second goes to the PIO, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA) (it has the central-funds and policy view). The SPV knows the ground truth; MoHUA knows the money pipeline.
Step 2 — Draft the application. Use plain language. Under Section 6 of the RTI Act 2005, any citizen can ask — no lawyer needed. For the format, see how to draft and file an RTI under Section 6.
Step 3 — Pay the fee. The central fee is Rs 10 (Central RTI Rules). For the SPV, check your state rules — some charge nothing for BPL holders. For accepted payment modes, see RTI fee and payment modes.
Step 4 — Submit. Hand it in at the SPV office and the MoHUA desk, or send by registered post. Keep the stamped copy and postal slip as proof.
Step 5 — Wait 30 days. A reply is due within 30 days (48 hours if life or liberty is at stake). If you hear nothing, or the reply is evasive, move to the appeal stage below.
These five give you the fullest picture for the least effort:
To: The Public Information Officer,
[Name of Smart City SPV], [City]
(and separately) PIO, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, New Delhi
Subject: Application under Section 6, RTI Act 2005 — Smart City project status
Sir/Madam,
I, [your name], resident of [address], seek the following information
under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, regarding the
Smart Cities Mission in [city]:
1. Ward-wise list of Smart City projects, with status for each.
2. Project-wise expenditure, year-wise, from Grant Fund and state/ULB shares.
3. Latest completion percentage, area-wise (ABD and pan-city).
4. Records of citizen-engagement / public consultations held, with dates.
5. Operational status, uptime and functions of the city ICCC.
A postal order / court-fee stamp of Rs 10 is attached as the fee.
Place: ______ Date: ______
Signature: ______
Level 1 — First Appeal. If the PIO does not reply in 30 days, or gives a vague answer, file a First Appeal with the First Appellate Authority (FAA) of the same public authority within 30 days of the reply date (or the day it was due). The FAA is usually a senior officer one level above the PIO, and must decide within 30 days (extendable to 45).
Level 2 — Second Appeal. If the FAA also fails, file a Second Appeal before the Central Information Commission (CIC) for MoHUA matters, or the State Information Commission for the SPV, usually within 90 days of the FAA order. The Commission can summon the PIO, impose a penalty up to Rs 25,000, and order disclosure.
Level 3 — RTI as proof for a court or tribunal. If the issue is a broken road, a missed service, or misused funds, the RTI reply becomes your evidence. You can then go to a civil court, the Lokayukta, or a consumer forum, with the RTI order attached. RTI is often the cheapest first step because it turns “I think something is wrong” into “here is the official document.”
Each smart city plan has two parts. ABD (Area-Based Development) means fixing up a small chosen area (one ward, one market, one slum cluster). Pan-City means a feature covering the whole city — usually technology, like the ICCC, a traffic system, or a citizen app. When you file RTI, ask for both separately, because the money and delays often sit in different buckets.
Before filing, check the free public sources — your RTI can then target only what is missing:
If these already answer your question, you save a stamp. If not, your RTI asks for exactly the gap.
If this helped, the RTI Playbook walks you through drafting, filing, appeals and penalties with ready templates for every common situation — download it to file with confidence. And if you want more such plain-language guides to stay free and updated, consider a small donation to support this work.
Last reviewed: 3 July 2026.
See Smart City RTI and AMRUT RTI and PMAY Status RTI and How to File RTI.