Ramesh lives in a small town. The municipality just built a new road near his house. Within three months the road cracked. People joke that the contractor used cheap material. Ramesh wants to know: who got the contract, for how much, and whether the work matched what was promised. He is told, “It is a government contract, it is secret.” That is not true. Once a contract is awarded, most of the papers are yours to see. This guide shows you, step by step, how to use the Right to Information Act to get them.
Direct answer in one line. After a government contract is awarded, file an RTI to the Public Information Officer (PIO) of the authority that gave the contract. Ask for the award letter, the winning bidder's name, the contract value, the scope of work, and any changes from the tender. The fee is Rs. 10 for central authorities — see state-wise RTI fees if your authority is state-level.
About this article — Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness, Trust (E-E-A-T)
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Reviewed by | RTI Wiki editorial team |
| Expertise | Right to Information Act 2005, General Financial Rules 2017, public procurement law |
| Sources | CPPP (eprocure.gov.in), GeM (gem.gov.in), RTI Online, PIB (pib.gov.in), Dept. of Expenditure, GFR 2017 Rules 144 & 173 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-07-11 |
The government buys goods, works and services through tenders. While the tender is still being decided, the bids are protected under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act (commercial confidence of bidders). But once the contract is awarded, the picture changes. The winning name, the value, the scope and the award letter are no longer secret. The Central Information Commission (CIC) has said this again and again. For a broader understanding of the Act, see our complete guide to the RTI Act 2005.
Two CIC orders prove the point:
The lesson: post-award, the award letter, winning bidder, value, scope and BOQ are yours; the losing bidders' secret technical plans and internal pricing stay protected. For a fuller treatment of this boundary, see our guide RTI for tender and contract papers.
This is the most common question citizens ask. The answer depends on whether you are asking about pre-award or post-award documents. Here is a clear breakdown:
| Document | Pre-award (tender stage) | Post-award (after LOA) | How to get it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Letter of Award (LOA) / Work Order | Not yet issued | Disclosable — CIC in *Anchal Kharya* and *Taba Niumpu* | RTI to the awarding authority |
| Name of successful bidder | Protected (Section 8(1)(d)) | Must be published — GFR Rule 173(xviii) | Check CPPP or website first |
| Contract value / awarded amount | Protected | Disclosable — Section 4(1)(b) suo motu | RTI if not on website |
| Scope of work / deliverables | Protected | Disclosable | RTI to PIO |
| Bill of Quantities (BOQ) | Partially protected | Disclosable — *Taba Niumpu* order | RTI with Section 10 severability |
| Deviation statement (tender vs award) | N/A | Disclosable | RTI — this is where corruption hides |
| Performance security / EMD status | Protected | Disclosable | RTI to PIO |
| Full signed agreement | N/A | Usually exempt (Section 8(1)(d)) | Override with Section 8(2) public interest |
| DPR (Detailed Project Report) | Protected | Usually exempt (Section 8(1)(d)) | Override with Section 8(2) if corruption suspected |
| Losing bidders' technical proposals | Protected | Protected — stays exempt | Cannot be obtained |
| Losing bidders' financial bids | Protected | Protected — stays exempt | Cannot be obtained |
Key takeaway: The deviation statement — the gap between what was tendered and what was awarded — is the single most powerful document to request. This is where extra items, changed quantities and inflated rates usually hide. Always ask for it.
You do not have to argue from thin air. Real rules support you.
If a PIO pushes back, quote Rule 173(xviii) for the bidder name, Rule 144 for the transparency duty, and the two CIC orders for the award letter and BOQ.
Before you file, check what is already public. A good RTI asks only for what is missing.
If the award is already on CPPP, print it. Your RTI then targets what CPPP does not show — scope, deviations, and performance-security status.
Ask for exactly these five questions, in plain words:
You can also use our AI RTI drafter tool to generate a custom application, or file directly through RTI Online (rtionline.gov.in) for central authorities.
To: The Central Public Information Officer [Name of the Public Authority that awarded the contract] Subject: Application under Section 6(1), RTI Act 2005 — Disclosure of contract award details Sir/Madam, Contract/Tender No.: [fill] Name of work/goods: [fill] Date of award (if known): [fill] Please furnish certified copies of: 1. The Letter of Award / award letter to the successful bidder. 2. The name of the successful bidder and the total awarded contract value. 3. The scope of work / deliverables and the contract start and completion dates. 4. Any deviations between the tendered scope and the awarded scope (extra items, changed quantities or rates). 5. The status of Earnest Money Deposit and Performance Security furnished by the bidder. 6. The Bill of Quantities (BOQ) as awarded, with Section 10 severability applied to any exempt portions. The requested information is disclosable in view of Rule 173(xviii) and Rule 144 of the GFR 2017, Section 4(1)(b) of the RTI Act, and the CIC orders in Anchal Kharya v. NTPC (CIC/NTPCO/A/2019/114181, 08/12/2020) and Taba Niumpu v. POWERGRID (22/07/2025). Section 10 severability may be applied to any exempt portions. Application fee: Rs. 10 paid by [Indian Postal Order / cash against receipt / electronic payment].
A note on the fee. Under the Central RTI Rules, 2012 (G.S.R. 603(E) dated 31/07/2012), the application fee is Rs. 10 for central public authorities, the application should not exceed 500 words (but cannot be rejected only for crossing that), BPL applicants pay nothing on producing a BPL certificate, and payment can be by cash against a receipt, by DD/Banker's Cheque/Indian Postal Order to the Accounts Officer, or by electronic means. State public authorities may charge Rs. 10 to Rs. 50 under their own RTI rules, so check the state-wise RTI fee table if you are writing to a state PSU or authority. BPL applicants can claim a full fee waiver — see our BPL RTI fee waiver guide.
1. **Gather the basics.** Note the tender/contract number, the authority, and the date of award. Find what is already on [[https://eprocure.gov.in/cppp/|CPPP]] and the authority's website. 2. **File the RTI** with the PIO of the authority that awarded the contract. Pay the Rs. 10 fee (central) or the state fee. Keep the receipt and a stamped copy. File online via [[rtionline-gov-in|RTI Online]] for central authorities. 3. **Wait 30 days** (Section 7(1)). If the matter concerns life or liberty, the limit is 48 hours. 4. **No reply or a bad reply?** File **First Appeal** under Section 19(1) within 30 days, to the First Appellate Authority of the same authority. It is free. See our [[file-first-appeal-rti-section-19-2026|guide to filing a first appeal under Section 19]]. 5. **FAA also fails?** File **Second Appeal to the CIC** under Section 19(3) within 90 days. The CIC can order disclosure, apply Section 10 severability, and issue a Section 25(5) advisory — exactly as in *Taba Niumpu*. See [[file-second-appeal-cic-sic-2026|how to file a second appeal to the CIC/SIC]]. 6. **Suspect a crime (corruption, forged papers, substandard work)?** Take the RTI papers to the anti-corruption branch / CBI / local police under the Prevention of Corruption Act, or to the CVC. The CVC's Chief Technical Examiner's Organisation examines tender evaluations. The RTI papers are your evidence. 7. **For the contract dispute itself** (not just disclosure), the route is the civil court or the tribunal for that contract type — but the RTI papers are the proof you fight with.
For a comprehensive walk-through of the entire RTI process, see the RTI Playbook or our step-by-step guide to filing an RTI in India.
The PIO will often cite Section 8(1)(d) — “commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property” — to deny your request. But this exemption does not survive after award for the winner's name, value, scope, and award letter. Here is how to counter each common refusal:
| PIO's refusal ground | Why it fails post-award | Your counter |
|---|---|---|
| “Commercial confidence under Section 8(1)(d)” | Exemption dissolves once contract is awarded — CIC in *Anchal Kharya* and *Taba Niumpu* | Quote Rule 173(xviii) GFR + both CIC orders |
| “Third-party information under Section 11” | Section 11 is a procedure, not an exemption — it only requires the PIO to consult the third party before disclosure | The CIC has clarified that the LOA, value and scope are not third-party secrets post-award |
| “Contract contains trade secrets” | Trade secrets are protectable, but the award letter, value and scope are not trade secrets | Ask for severance under Section 10 — release everything except genuine trade secrets |
| “Personal information under Section 8(1)(j)” | PAN/TIN of the bidder can be severed; the bidder's name is not personal information — it must be published under Rule 173(xviii) | Agree to severance of PAN/TIN; insist on the bidder name |
| “Consultation with third party takes time” | Section 11(1) gives the third party time, but the decision to disclose is the PIO's, not the third party's | File first appeal if the PIO hides behind third-party “consent” |
Critical: If you suspect corruption or substandard work endangering public safety, invoke Section 8(2) — the public-interest override. Section 8(2) says that information exempt under 8(1) shall be disclosed if the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interest. Quote this when the PIO refuses the full agreement or the DPR on corruption grounds.
For more on challenging Section 8(1) exemptions, see our guides on challenging the fiduciary-relationship exemption under Section 8(1)(e) and penalty provisions under Section 20. If the PIO does not reply at all, you can also file a Section 18 complaint directly to the CIC.
When a public authority hands out a public contract, it holds the public's money in trust. The Supreme Court said this in Delhi Development Authority v. Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. (06/05/1996, 1996 (4) SCC 622 / 1996 INSC 619). The Court used the public-trust / constructive-trust idea and Article 142 to do complete justice for defrauded allottees, piercing the corporate veil. The point for us: public-property contracts are held to a higher standard of accountability — which is why the RTI route exists for them.
This principle extends to all public procurement — roads, bridges, buildings, utilities, and social-sector schemes. If you are investigating a specific type of infrastructure project, these guides may help: RTI for bridge construction delays, RTI for airport expansion projects, RTI for Swachh Bharat fund usage, RTI for AMRUT scheme funds, RTI for Smart City Mission projects, and RTI for utilization certificates.
For broader accountability tools, see RTI for vigilance clearance and RTI for CAG audit objections.
RTI is powerful for getting documents, but it is not the only tool. Here is how RTI compares with other routes citizens can use when they suspect irregularity in a government contract:
| Route | What it gives you | Time taken | Cost | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTI to PIO | Certified copies of award letter, BOQ, deviations, value | 30 days (+ appeal if denied) | Rs. 10 (central) | Getting documentary evidence |
| CPGRAMS complaint | Forwarded to the authority for action on the grievance | 30–60 days | Free | Flagging the issue for administrative action |
| CVC complaint | Investigation by Central Vigilance Commission into corruption | 3–6 months | Free | Allegations of corruption in tender/award |
| CAG audit objection | Flagged in audit report if CAG picks it up | Months–years | Free (via RTI — see CAG audit RTI) | Systemic financial irregularities |
| Civil court / tribunal | Contractual remedy — damages, injunction, specific performance | Years | High (lawyer fees) | Contract disputes (not just disclosure) |
| Consumer forum | Deficiency in service if you are an affected consumer | 1–3 years | Low filing fee | Substandard public works affecting you |
| Section 18 CIC complaint | Direct complaint to CIC for non-response/malafide refusal | 2–6 months | Free | When PIO ignores or wrongly refuses your RTI |
Strategy tip: File the RTI first — even if you plan to go to CVC or court later. The certified copies you get under RTI become your evidence in every other forum. Without documentary proof, complaints are dismissed as allegations.
Yes. Ask for the variation order and its justification — the extra amount, the reason, and who approved it. Variation orders are post-award documents and are disclosable. If the authority refuses, cite the *Anchal Kharya* principle: once a tender decision is taken, there is no justification to keep it secret.
Yes. Ask for the termination order and the recorded reasons. If a fresh contract was awarded on the same scope, ask for both the old termination order and the new award letter.
Quote Rule 173(xviii) GFR 2017 (winner's name must be public) and the *Anchal Kharya* and *Taba Niumpu* orders. Remind the PIO that Section 10 lets exempt parts be cut out and the rest released. If the PIO still refuses, file a first appeal under Section 19(1) within 30 days.
Usually not — the full agreement and the DPR were held exempt under Section 8(1)(d) in *Anchal Kharya*. But the award letter, BOQ, value, scope and deviations are disclosable. If there is a larger public interest (corruption, safety), invoke Section 8(2) public-interest override and argue that the public interest in disclosure outweighs the commercial confidentiality.
30 days from the date of receipt of your application (Section 7(1)). If the matter concerns the life or liberty of a person, the limit is 48 hours. If the information concerns a third party, the PIO may take up to 40 days after following the Section 11 consultation procedure.
Deemed refusal. You can file a first appeal under Section 19(1) within 30 days (treating the silence as a deemed refusal), or file a Section 18 complaint directly to the CIC. See our guide to Section 18 CIC complaints. You can also seek a penalty against the PIO under Section 20 — see Section 20 penalty guide.
Yes. Under Section 2(j)(i) of the RTI Act, you have the right to inspect works, documents and records — take notes and certified copies. You can also inspect samples of materials under Section 2(j)(ii). Request an inspection date in your RTI application. See whether someone else can attend the inspection on your behalf.
Yes, for central authorities. Use the RTI Online portal (rtionline.gov.in). Pay the Rs. 10 fee by internet banking, UPI, or credit/debit card. Many state governments also have their own online RTI portals. For a full walk-through, see our digital RTI filing guide.
The same CIC principles apply, but you file with the State Information Commission (SIC) for second appeal, not the CIC. The fee may be higher (Rs. 10–50). Check the state-wise RTI fee table and your state's RTI rules. See how to file a second appeal to the SIC.
Yes. For goods and common services procured through GeM (gem.gov.in), the award details (vendor, rate, quantity) are visible on the portal. Your RTI can target what GeM does not show — inspection reports, quality complaints, deviation from the approved requirement.
This raises a conflict-of-interest issue. You can ask for: (a) the bidder's declaration of no conflict of interest (required under GFR Rule 144(iii)), (b) the vigilance clearance status of the approving officer, and © whether the contract was vetted by the internal vigilance wing. Cross-reference with RTI for vigilance clearance.
Yes. Quality test reports, third-party inspection certificates, and material test records are disclosable post-award. They are not commercial secrets — they are public-safety documents. Ask for certified copies of all quality-assurance reports submitted during execution. If substandard material is suspected, invoke Section 8(2) public-interest override.
No. There is no time bar under the RTI Act. You can file years after the award, as long as the records are maintained by the authority (typically 5–12 years depending on the record type and the authority's retention policy). However, file as soon as possible — records may be destroyed under the retention schedule.
Last reviewed: 11 July 2026.