Direct answer in 30 seconds. File your RTI to the Depot Manager / Divisional Office of your State Road Transport Corporation (STC) — the depot that runs your route. Quote the route number and dates. Ask for the sanctioned timetable versus actually-deployed trips, vehicle-wise breakdown logs, fuel or EV-charging records, and the restoration date. Fee is Rs.10 (Central; some states charge Rs.20 — check your State RTI Rules). Reply due in 30 days.
Anita K. works as a lab technician at the district hospital in a tier-2 city of about six lakh people — one of the 116 cities chosen under the Centre's PM-eBus Sewa scheme. For years she has taken City Bus Route No. 12 from Depot-A to Hospital Square. The printed timetable at her stop promises a bus every 20 minutes, 36 trips a day. For the last two months she has stood at that stop for 50, sometimes 60 minutes at a stretch. She has counted: the real frequency has fallen to about 14 trips a day. Twice she has seen two Route-12 buses parked, engineless, behind the depot gate.
Nobody at the depot counter will tell her why. “Staff shortage,” says one clerk. “Bus sent for repair,” says another. A third shrugs: “Electric bus charging problem.” Anita is not asking for a favour. She is asking for the record — the simple paper that says how many trips were scheduled, how many actually ran, why the rest did not, and when the route will be restored. That record is hers to demand. The Right to Information Act, 2005 lets any citizen ask a public authority for recorded information, and a State Transport Corporation is a public authority. This guide shows you, step by step, how to file that RTI, what to ask, and how to escalate if the depot stays silent.
A State Transport Corporation (STC) — called a State Road Transport Corporation (RTC) in some states — is not a private bus company and not a purely private department. It is a statutory body created by a Central law, the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950 (Act No. 64 of 1950, enacted 4 December 1950). Under Section 3 of that Act, a State Government establishes an RTC by notification; under Section 4, every Corporation is a “body corporate” with perpetual succession and a common seal, capable of suing and being sued.
Because an RTC is a statutory body created by a Central Act and funded substantially by the State, it is a “public authority” under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. That single fact is the foundation of this entire guide: the STC cannot tell you it is “private” or “autonomous” and refuse your RTI. The Madras High Court confirmed this in Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram Ltd.) v. Tamil Nadu State Information Commission, W.P. No. 19669 of 2022, decided 15 December 2023. The Court treated the STC as a public authority responding to RTI; it set aside a Rs.10,000 State Information Commission penalty on the PIO only on the narrow ground that the COVID limitation period (15 March 2020 to 28 February 2022) was excluded. The STC's status as an RTI-amenable body was not in doubt.
For private stage carriages (the yellow-board buses run by private operators on a route), the STC itself is not the right target. The route and the permit are granted by the State Transport Authority (STA) or a Regional Transport Authority (RTA), constituted under Section 68 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Section 66 of that Act says no transport vehicle may be used in a public place except under a permit granted or countersigned by a Regional or State Transport Authority. Under Section 68(3)(ca), the STA formulates routes for stage carriages and settles inter-region route disputes. So: STC for the corporation's own buses; STA/RTA for private-operator permits.
Why this matters for your RTI. If your route is run by the state corporation, file at the STC depot. If it is run by a private operator under a permit, file at the STA/RTA — ask for the permit conditions, the approved timetable, and the complaint history against that operator. Filing at the wrong office is the most common reason a bus-route RTI bounces.
To ask a sharp question, you need to know which record lives where. An STC is usually structured as: Head Office (Corporation HQ) → Divisional Office → Depot. The Depot Manager runs day-to-day operations for a cluster of routes — the depot holds the operational records you most want: route timetables, vehicle-wise trip logs, breakdown and grounding registers, fuel issue registers, EV-charging logs, driver roster, and ridership counts. The Divisional Office holds route-level performance summaries and route-rationalisation orders. The Head Office holds fleet, finance, and scheme records (including PM-eBus Sewa deployment orders at the state end).
At the Central level, three ministries hold different pieces:
Two things changed in 2026 that directly shape a bus-route RTI.
First, PM-eBus Sewa moved from paper to pavement. Operations began on 14 February 2026 in the first four cities (Guwahati, Nagpur, Bhavnagar, Chandigarh) with 225 e-buses flagged off, and Letters of Award now cover 5,012 buses across 69 cities. If your city is one of the 116, the answer to “why is my route frequency cut?” may now involve an e-bus transition plan — diesel buses being withdrawn before enough e-buses are commissioned. That is a documented transition, and the deployment schedule is a disclosable record.
Second, bus safety inspection got teeth. At the 43rd Transport Development Council (January 2026), MoRTH announced that new buses will not be registered by RTOs without physical plus video inspection of safety features, with a manufacturer/body-builder/RTO checklist uploaded on the Vahan portal. For an “e-bus breakdown/safety” angle, you can ask the STC for the safety-compliance inspection records of a specific bus or route — a question that simply did not exist in this form a year ago.
What does this mean for Anita? The reason her Route-12 buses are parked engineless may be a documented e-bus transition or a safety-withdrawal order, not a vague “staff shortage.” That makes now the right time to ask — while the records are fresh and the deployment is ongoing.
You will usually file one application, at the depot that runs your route. If your city is a PM-eBus Sewa participant and the question involves e-bus deployment, you can file a second, Central application to MoHUA in parallel.
Step 1 — Identify the public authority and the PIO.
Step 2 — Prepare your questions. Ask for specific, dated records, not vague “details.” Five strong questions:
Step 3 — Use the right form and fee.
Step 4 — Submit and keep proof. File by hand at the depot office and take a stamped receiving copy, or send by registered post and keep the acknowledgement, or file online and save the registration number. Proof of submission is your protection if the reply is delayed.
Step 5 — Wait 30 days. The PIO must reply within 30 days of receiving your application. Under Section 7(1), where the information concerns the life or liberty of a person, the reply is due within 48 hours — but a routine frequency-cut query does not normally meet that bar unless it concerns, say, a school route with safety implications.
You can draft and check your application with the AI RTI Draft App at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html and verify a reply against the Act with the PIO Reply Checker at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/pio-reply-checker-app.html .
RTI is powerful because it has a built-in ladder. If the PIO ignores you or gives a vague reply, you do not stop there.
For bus-route RTIs, the most common outcome is that the depot replies with partial information — say, the sanctioned timetable but not the breakdown log — and asks you to “approach the divisional office” for the rest. Filing a first appeal that lists exactly which of your five questions went unanswered is usually enough to get the full record.
Plain explainer. The First Appellate Authority is a senior officer in the same STC who reviews the PIO's decision. The State Information Commission is the independent body that can order disclosure and penalise a PIO who wrongly withholds information.
Anita K., district hospital lab technician, tier-2 city (population ~6 lakh, PM-eBus Sewa participant).
In May 2026, Anita filed an RTI to the Public Information Officer, Divisional Office, [State] Road Transport Corporation, Depot-A, citing Route No. 12 (Depot-A to Hospital Square) and the period 01 March 2026 to 30 April 2026. She asked five questions: sanctioned versus actual trips, vehicle-wise breakdown log, fuel/charging records, any route-rationalisation or PM-eBus Sewa order, and the projected restoration date. She attached a photocopy of her Aadhaar and a used monthly bus pass, and paid the Rs.10 fee by Indian Postal Order.
The depot replied on day 27. The trip log showed that of the sanctioned 36 trips per day, only 12 to 15 had actually been deployed; the breakdown register listed two buses grounded since mid-March awaiting an e-bus replacement under the city's PM-eBus Sewa allocation; a route-rationalisation note dated 20 March 2026 had temporarily reduced frequency pending e-bus commissioning. The restoration date was given as 30 June 2026. Total cost to Anita: Rs.10 and one Postal Order. The information let her and her residents' welfare association take the rationalisation note to the municipal transport committee and ask for an interim shuttle — a result she could not have reached by standing at the counter.
To
The Public Information Officer
Divisional Office / Depot-A
[Your State] Road Transport Corporation
[City]
Subject: Application under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005
— Bus route operations on Route No. [..] from [..] to [..]
Sir/Madam,
I, [your name], citizen of India, request the following information under
Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, relating to Route No. [12] (Depot-A to
Hospital Square) operated by this depot for the period 01 March 2026 to
30 April 2026:
1. The sanctioned timetable frequency for Route No. 12 and the
vehicle-wise, date-wise number of trips actually deployed on each
day in the said period.
2. The vehicle-wise breakdown and grounding register entries for buses
allotted to Route No. 12 in the said period, with dates, reasons,
and dates of return to service.
3. The fuel-issue register or EV-charging log entries for buses
allotted to Route No. 12 in the said period, including any recorded
fuel shortage or charging-station downtime.
4. Any route-rationalisation, frequency-reduction, or PM-eBus Sewa
deployment order affecting Route No. 12, with order number, date,
and issuing authority.
5. The projected date of restoration of the sanctioned frequency on
Route No. 12 and any action plan to achieve it.
I state that the information sought is not exempt under Section 8 or 9
of the RTI Act. If the information is held by another public authority,
please forward this application under Section 6(3) within five days.
I elect to receive the information in printed/electronic form. The
application fee of Rs.10 is paid by Indian Postal Order No. [..] dated
[..] in favour of the [State] Road Transport Corporation.
If the information is not furnished within the period specified under
Section 7(1), I reserve the right to file a first appeal under
Section 19(1) and a second appeal under Section 19(3).
Place: [..] Yours faithfully,
Date: [..] [your name and address]
[phone / email]
Yes. An STC is a statutory body created by the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950 (Section 3 and Section 4), and is therefore a “public authority” under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. The Madras High Court confirmed this in Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram Ltd.) v. Tamil Nadu State Information Commission (W.P. No. 19669 of 2022, decided 15 December 2023), where the Court treated the STC as a public authority responding to RTI. The STC cannot refuse on the ground that it is “autonomous” or “loss-making.”
File with the State Transport Authority or Regional Transport Authority for your region, constituted under Section 68 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Under Section 66, no transport vehicle may ply without a permit granted or countersigned by the STA/RTA. Ask for the permit conditions, the approved timetable, the frequency-compliance reports, and the complaint history against that operator. The STC depot will not hold a private operator's records.
The Central fee is Rs.10, payable by Indian Postal Order, court-fee stamp, cash against receipt, or electronic means, prescribed under the Right to Information Rules, 2012 (G.S.R. 603(E), 31 July 2012). For a State application to your STC, the fee varies by State RTI Rules — Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh charge Rs.10; some states charge Rs.20. Check your state's rules before filing. BPL applicants are exempt on production of proof. See RTI Fees by State and Online Portal Directory (2026) for a state-wise list.
File a First Appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act with the First Appellate Authority — the officer senior in rank to the PIO within the same STC — within 30 days of the expiry of the reply period. The FAA must decide within 30 days, extendable to 45. If the FAA also fails, file a Second Appeal under Section 19(3) with your State Information Commission. You can also file a complaint under Section 18 if the PIO never replied at all. Use the First Appeal App at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html to draft the appeal, and the Timeline Calculator at https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/timeline-calculator-app.html to compute your deadlines.
Yes. For an STC's own e-buses, ask the depot for the vehicle-wise breakdown and grounding log and the EV-charging records. For OEM warranty and payment-security questions under the PM e-Bus Sewa Payment Security Mechanism (PSM) Scheme (notified by the Ministry of Heavy Industries by S.O. 4711(E) dated 28 October 2024), file a Central RTI to MHI. For route and deployment questions under PM-eBus Sewa itself, file to MoHUA at the Central portal.
No. A trip log, breakdown register, and route-rationalisation order are the STC's own operational records, not third-party information under Section 11, and not commercial confidence under Section 8(1)(d) — they concern a public service run on public routes with public funds. Section 4(1)(b)(xii) in fact requires proactive disclosure of programmes and performances that affect the public. Push back in your first appeal; this is a standard evasion.
Ordinarily 500 words or less, as prescribed under the Right to Information Rules, 2012. The five questions above fit comfortably within that limit. If your application exceeds 500 words, the PIO may ask you to pay an additional fee for the extra words — keep it tight and dated.
For Central applications (MoHUA, MHI, MoRTH), file online at rtionline.gov.in — it is faster and gives you a registration number instantly. For State applications to an STC depot, paper filing at the depot counter with a stamped receiving copy, or registered post with acknowledgement, is usually the practical route, because most state online portals do not cover depot-level STC offices. Keep proof either way.
The RTI Act allows “any citizen” to file — each application is an individual citizen's. An RWA cannot file a single joint RTI, but its members can file identical applications in parallel, which is often effective: five dated applications from five commuters on the same route is harder for the depot to ignore than one.