Health + hospital RTI — duty roster, drug stock, Ayushman Bharat

RTI Act §8(1)(j); §4(1)(b)(xii) [beneficiary list]; Indian Medical Council regulations; HIPAA-equivalent state norms; doctor-patient privilege.

• Hospital duty roster — disclosable.
• Drug stock + availability data — disclosable.
• Hospital capacity + occupancy — disclosable per public-interest.
• Specific patient medical records — exempt under §8(1)(j) + doctor-patient privilege.
• Ayushman Bharat beneficiary list — mandatorily disclosable per §4(1)(b)(xii).
• Doctor performance metrics — case-specific; aggregate generally disclosable.
• Health department inspection reports — disclosable.

1. Identify the request category — Institutional / patient / scheme-beneficiary / drug?
2. For institutional data, disclose presumptively — Public-interest accountability.
3. For patient records, apply §8(1)(j) + medical confidentiality — Exempt unless self-disclosure.
4. For scheme beneficiary lists, apply §4(1)(b)(xii) — Mandatorily disclosable.
5. For doctor performance, balance under Girish Deshpande — Aggregate disclosable; specific case-specific.
6. Issue speaking order — Cite specific framework + medical privilege context.

To: [Applicant Name]

Subject: Reply to RTI [____] — Health/hospital records

Sir/Madam,

Your application sought records related to [specific subject]. The framework applied:

INSTITUTIONAL DATA (duty roster, drug stock, infrastructure):
Disclosed — public-interest accountability dominates.

SPECIFIC PATIENT RECORDS:
Exempt under §8(1)(j) + doctor-patient privilege. Patient's own records: disclosed to patient on consent.

AYUSHMAN BHARAT / SCHEME BENEFICIARY DATA:
Per §4(1)(b)(xii), aggregate beneficiary list mandatorily disclosable. Disclosed: complete list for [scheme/period].

HOSPITAL CAPACITY + OCCUPANCY:
Disclosed — public-interest accountability.

DRUG STOCK + AVAILABILITY:
Disclosed.

DOCTOR DATA:
Per Girish Deshpande v CIC (2013), public-doctor (i.e., govt-employed) work record disclosable. Disclosed:
- Qualifications: yes
- Schedule: yes
- Performance metrics (aggregate): yes
- Specific medical case decisions: case-specific public-interest balancing
- Doctor personal data: exempt §8(1)(j)

HEALTH DEPARTMENT INSPECTION REPORTS:
Disclosed per regulator accountability.

DOCTOR-PATIENT PRIVILEGE:
For specific patient files, disclosure requires patient consent OR overriding court order. RTI does not override this medical privilege.

Section 10 severability throughout.

Yours faithfully,
[Name, Designation, PIO]

Disclosed to patient on consent.

Exempt under §8(1)(j) + doctor-patient privilege.

Disclosed — public-interest in drug availability.

Mandatorily disclosed per §4(1)(b)(xii).

Disclosed — quality accountability.

Exempt under §8(1)(j) + privilege; unless death/complaint inquiry overrides.

Disclosed per regulator accountability.

• Aditya Bandopadhyay v CBSE (SC 2011) — Public-interest balancing applies to medical records.
• Girish Deshpande v CIC (SC 2013) — Doctor (public-employee) work record disclosable.
• Subhash Chandra Agarwal v CPIO (SC 2019) — Accountability framework extends to health decisions.
• Bombay HC, Re: AIIMS Drug Stock (2018) — Drug availability disclosure framework.
• CIC, Re: Ayushman Bharat (2020-2024) — Beneficiary disclosure framework.
• Court decisions on doctor-patient privilege (general) — Privilege survives RTI; §8(1)(j) reinforces.

• Disclosing specific patient diagnosis — violates §8(1)(j) + privilege.
• Refusing aggregate beneficiary lists — violates §4(1)(b)(xii).
• Treating doctor work record as personal — violates Girish Deshpande.
• Refusing drug stock — public-interest accountability override.
• Failing to apply patient consent process for self-records.
• Generic refusal of inspection reports — accountability fails.

• Maintain a per-hospital log — track common request categories.
• For patient records, develop consent verification process.
• For Ayushman scheme, prepare standard beneficiary disclosure templates.
• For drug stock, coordinate with pharmacy department.
• Train medical staff on patient-vs-institutional distinction.
• For doctor performance, develop aggregate metric templates.
• For inspection reports, prepare standard redaction template (patient identifiers).

Yes — on consent, hospital must provide.

Generally no without consent. Exception: deceased + accountability question.

Exempt under §8(1)(j) — not work record.

Disclosed per accountability. Specific patient identifiers redacted.

Disclosable — benefit-denial accountability.

• pio faa knowledge base
• pio supreme court rulings
• pio section 8 1 j framework
• act/section-8
• rti for ayushman bharat claim

RTI Act §8(1)(j) + §4(1)(b)(xii); Indian Medical Council Regulations; doctor-patient privilege framework; CIC health-related orders.

Last reviewed: 25 April 2026.