Quick answer. If your policy is less than 15 days old, do not file anywhere yet - send a free-look cancellation letter to the insurer by email and registered post. You get the full premium back minus stamp duty, medical fees, and risk-cover days. If the 15 days are over, or the insurer refuses, file at bimabharosa.irdai.gov.in. Insurer must reply in 15 days. No reply or unsatisfactory reply, escalate to the Insurance Ombudsman (free, awards binding on insurer up to Rs 50 lakh). Helpline 155255 or 1800 4254 732.
If you are short on time, jump to The 15-day free-look and the sample letter block.
This page is the long companion to our shorter file insurance complaint IRDAI guide. It exists because insurance mis-selling in India runs into thousands of crores every year and most people do not know the 15-day clock is ticking from the moment the policy bond reaches their hands.
Indian insurance is sold, not bought. An agent earns commission on first-year premium - sometimes 35% on a traditional plan, sometimes 7% on a unit-linked plan (ULIP), sometimes a flat fee per term-plan sold. The bigger the premium, the bigger the commission. So the agent's incentive is to push you into the largest premium product you will sign, not the right product for your need.
Banks made it worse. After 2015 most public-sector and private banks turned their branches into insurance shops. The clerk who opens your savings account is also a “certified” insurance specified person who earns a target. Many people who think they bought a “five-year fixed deposit at the bank” actually signed a 20-year participating endowment policy.
The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) responded with four lines of defence.
The 15-day window is the fastest. Bima Bharosa is the regulator's front desk. The ombudsman is the quasi-judicial body. Consumer commission and civil court sit beyond. Most cases settle at level 2 or 3 if you file correctly and on time.
The agent says “lock in for 5 years, get guaranteed returns, full tax-free”. You sign a Unit Linked Insurance Plan with 5-year minimum lock-in but 15- or 20-year tenure. Year 1 charges eat 30 to 60 percent of your premium - allocation charge, mortality charge, policy administration, fund management. Year 6 you discover your “guaranteed” corpus is below the premium you paid.
This is the single biggest category of mis-selling in India. Bima Bharosa lets you flag it as “Unfair Business Practices” under the policyholders' interests regulations.
You came for a pure term cover. The agent adds an accidental disability rider, a critical illness rider, a return-of-premium rider, and a waiver-of-premium rider. Your annual premium doubles. Half of those riders overlap with cover you already have through your employer.
If the agent did not show you a benefit illustration with and without riders, that is a Regulation 4 breach.
Twenty-year endowment, money-back, or whole-life plans. Year 3 you realise you cannot afford the premium. You ask the insurer for refund. They quote a surrender value of 30% of what you paid - and that is if you completed three years. If you stopped before three years, you get zero.
The agent never told you that. The regulator requires that surrender disclosure be in the benefit illustration and the policy bond first page. If it isn't, that's a ground.
“This plan gives 12% guaranteed”. “Bonus rate has always been 6%”. “Your money doubles in 8 years”. All of these statements are misleading - only the declared bonus for past years is real, and future bonuses are non-guaranteed. Section 41 of the Insurance Act, 1938 prohibits inducement by promise of returns not authorised by the insurer.
The agent fills the proposal form themselves. They tick “yes” on health-history questions you would tick “no”. They sign your name. Two years later your claim is rejected for “non-disclosure of pre-existing disease” - the disclosure was your signature on the form, except it wasn't your signature.
Or the agent persuades you to surrender an old LIC policy and start a new one. They earn a fresh first-year commission. You lose the bonuses and continuity. This is twisting and churning - banned under IRDAI's Code of Conduct for Insurance Agents.
Regulation 6(2) of the IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders' Interests) Regulations 2017 gives every life and most non-life policyholders a 15-day free-look period. Effective 1 April 2024, the IRDAI extended the free-look window for all individual life and health insurance policies to 30 days from the date of receipt of the policy bond. The change flows from the IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders' Interests, Operations and Allied Matters of Insurers) Regulations, 2024 and is consolidated in the IRDAI Master Circular on Protection of Policyholders' Interests dated 5 September 2024.
This is the single most common confusion. The 15 days run from the date of receipt of the policy document, not the date you paid the premium and not the date the policy was issued. If the courier delivered the bond on 1 April, the deadline is 16 April. If you got a soft copy on email on 1 April and the physical bond on 5 April, the regulator treats the earlier acknowledged delivery as the trigger. Keep the courier slip or email timestamp.
If you cancel within the window, the insurer must refund:
For ULIPs, the refund is on the fund value as on the cancellation date, plus the deductions returned. If the market dropped, you eat that loss - but you escape every future charge.
Send a single email and a single hard-copy letter to:
Use the sample letter below. Include the policy number, date of receipt of the bond, a one-line reason (“policy does not match the product I was sold; invoking 15-day free-look under Regulation 6(2) of the IRDAI POPI Regulations 2017”), and your bank details for refund.
The insurer must refund within 15 days of receipt of the request. If they delay, the regulator's Regulation 11 entitles you to bank-rate interest on the held amount.
Four pieces of law sit behind every complaint.
Section 41 bans rebating - the agent offering you a share of their commission, or any inducement, to buy the policy. Most “first-year premium discount” pitches are illegal under Section 41. Penalty: Rs 10 lakh. Section 64VB says no insurer can take risk on a policy unless premium is received in advance - which is why insurers cannot “backdate” a policy without your signed consent.
Section 14 makes the regulator responsible for “protection of the interests of policyholders” and “ensuring fair conduct by insurers and intermediaries”. Section 26 lets the regulator issue binding directions to insurers. Bima Bharosa runs under this authority.
The day-to-day rule book. Key clauses:
Notified by the Department of Financial Services under Section 24 of the Insurance Act. Creates 17 Insurance Ombudsman offices across India. We cover this in detail in section after IRDAI - the Insurance Ombudsman.
If your loss exceeds the ombudsman's Rs 50 lakh limit, or you want compensation beyond what the ombudsman can award, the District, State, or National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission is the forum. Filing fee starts at Rs 100. Insurance has been “service” under the Consumer Protection Acts since Spring Meadows Hospital v. Harjol Ahluwalia (1998) 4 SCC 39 and reaffirmed under the 2019 Act in Reliance General Insurance v. Mampee Timbers (2021) 3 SCC 673.
The portal will reject your complaint if you have not already raised the issue with the insurer's grievance officer. Find the email on page 1 of your policy bond, or on the insurer's website under “Grievance Redressal”. Send a written complaint by email. Wait 15 days. If no reply or an unsatisfactory reply, move to Bima Bharosa.
Keep a screenshot of your email and any reply (or non-reply). Bima Bharosa will ask you to upload it.
Visit bimabharosa.irdai.gov.in. Click “Register”. You will need:
Set a password. Note your Complainant ID - you will need it to track the case.
After login, click “Register Complaint”. The form has six tabs.
Submit. The portal generates a token number. Save it.
IRDAI forwards the complaint to the insurer's nodal officer. The insurer must reply to you (and update Bima Bharosa) within 15 days.
Login monthly. Status moves through: Registered → Under Examination by Insurer → Insurer Response Received → Resolved / Unsatisfactory.
If a fortnight passes with no movement, call the 155255 helpline or 1800 4254 732. Send a polite reminder to [email protected] quoting your token.
If Bima Bharosa does not resolve the matter, you escalate to the Insurance Ombudsman under the Redressal of Public Grievances Rules 2017. This is a quasi-judicial body. Award amounts up to Rs 50 lakh are binding on the insurer. Filing is free. You appear in person, by lawyer (not required), or by video conference.
Rule 14(3) of the RPG Rules 2017 says you can approach only after:
And within one year of (a) the insurer's reply or (b) the end of the 30-day silence.
Find your office by zone at cioins.co.in - the Council for Insurance Ombudsmen runs it. Offices: Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Bhopal, Bhubaneswar, Chandigarh, Chennai, Delhi, Ernakulam, Guwahati, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kolkata, Lucknow, Mumbai, Noida, Patna, Pune. Jurisdiction follows the address on your policy bond, not where the insurer's head office sits.
Form P-II (“Complaint to the Ombudsman”) is downloadable from cioins.co.in. Send the signed form by email to the zonal ombudsman, with:
You also sign Form P-III, a self-declaration that the same matter is not pending in any court, consumer forum, or arbitration.
Most cases are decided on paper. For contested ones, the ombudsman holds a conciliation meeting first. If the insurer agrees, an award is recorded and binding. If conciliation fails, the ombudsman issues a reasoned award within 3 months of receiving all papers.
Awards up to Rs 50 lakh bind the insurer under Rule 17 of RPG 2017. You can accept or reject. If you accept, the insurer must comply within 30 days. If they delay, you take the award to the executing court (district court) for enforcement under Rule 17(7), the same way you would execute an arbitration award.
If you reject, you keep the option of consumer commission or civil suit. The insurer cannot appeal an ombudsman award; the only review route is a writ petition under Article 226, which is rarely granted.
If your loss is more than Rs 50 lakh, or you want compensation beyond what the ombudsman can give (loss of opportunity, mental harassment beyond Rs 1 lakh, exemplary damages), file at the appropriate Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission under the Consumer Protection Act 2019.
The Consumer Protection Rules 2020 allow electronic filing via e-jagriti.gov.in. File within 2 years of cause of action. Insurance counts as “service” under Section 2(42) of the 2019 Act.
The leading mis-selling judgment is LIC of India v. Smt. Asha Goel (2001) 2 SCC 160 - the court held that the insurer's duty of utmost good faith works both ways. Reliance Life Insurance v. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod (2019) 6 SCC 175 narrowed the buyer's protection on health non-disclosure but did not touch agent mis-selling on the insurer side.
If the regulator itself does not respond, or the case involves a systemic issue (whole class of policies mis-sold, agent network operating without ID), you can:
Public-sector insurers (LIC, GIC Re, New India Assurance, Oriental Insurance, National Insurance, United India Insurance, Agriculture Insurance Co., ECGC) are public authorities under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act 2005. So is IRDAI itself. You can extract:
Private insurers are not public authorities under the RTI Act per Tata Sons v. Right to Information (CIC, 2007) and a long string of CIC decisions. But IRDAI's records about the private insurer are accessible.
Use our AI RTI Drafter to generate the application. If the PIO refuses or delays beyond 30 days, file a first appeal using the First Appeal Builder under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act.
[Date]
To,
The Grievance Officer
[Insurance Company Name]
[Policy servicing branch address]
Email: [grievance officer email from policy bond page 1]
Subject: Free-look cancellation of Policy No. [number] under Regulation 6(2)
of IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders' Interests) Regulations 2017
Sir/Madam,
1. I, [Name], holder of the above policy, received the policy bond on
[date of receipt - keep courier slip / email]. I have reviewed the
terms.
2. The policy as issued does not match the product the agent represented
at the time of sale. Specifically, [one or two sentences - "I was told
this was a 5-year guaranteed return product but the bond shows a 20-
year ULIP with 5-year lock-in and market-linked returns" or similar].
3. I hereby invoke the 15-day free-look period under Regulation 6(2) of
the IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders' Interests) Regulations 2017
and request full refund of the premium of Rs [amount] paid on [date],
subject only to deductions permitted under the Regulation (stamp duty,
pro-rated risk cover, and any medical examination cost actually
incurred by the insurer).
4. Please credit the refund to the same bank account from which the
premium was debited. Account: [last 4 digits], IFSC [IFSC].
5. Please acknowledge this request within 7 days and effect the refund
within the statutory 15 days. If the refund is delayed I will claim
bank-rate interest under Regulation 11.
6. Kindly mark a copy to the IRDAI complaints cell at
[email protected].
Yours faithfully,
[Name]
[Signature]
[Phone] [Email]
Enclosures: copy of policy bond first page, copy of premium payment
proof, copy of agent's sales-pitch evidence if available.
Send by email with read-receipt and by registered post with acknowledgement due (RPAD). Keep both proofs.
Policy No: [number]
Insurer: [insurer]
Date of issue: [date]
Date policy bond received: [date]
Premium paid: Rs [amount]
Sum assured: Rs [amount]
Complaint: I purchased the captioned policy on the representation of
agent Mr/Ms [agent name, IRDAI code if known] that it was a 5-year
guaranteed-return product comparable to a bank fixed deposit. The
policy bond received on [date] shows it is a [actual product] with
[actual features] and a [actual tenure]-year term. This is a clear
case of mis-selling and unfair business practice in breach of:
- Section 41 of the Insurance Act 1938 (inducement by misleading
statement).
- Regulation 4 of the IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders' Interests)
Regulations 2017 (mandatory benefit illustration).
- The IRDAI Code of Conduct for Insurance Agents (Reg. 9 of the
IRDAI (Insurance Agents) Regulations 2015).
I sent a free-look cancellation request to the insurer on [date]. The
insurer [did not reply / replied on [date] refusing on the ground that
[reason]]. My written grievance is dated [date]. Copies attached.
Relief sought: Full refund of premium with bank-rate interest from
the date of my free-look request, cancellation of the policy ab
initio, and disciplinary action against the agent under the IRDAI
Insurance Agents Regulations 2015.
Case 1. The ULIP-as-FD refund. A retired schoolteacher in Pune deposited Rs 10 lakh at the bank branch after the relationship manager pitched a “5-year guaranteed plan”. The plan turned out to be a 15-year ULIP. The bond reached her on day 9 after issue. She emailed free-look cancellation on day 13. Insurer refused on day 17, citing “free-look only available for individual life agents, not bancassurance”. She filed at Bima Bharosa on day 20 under “Unfair Business Practices”. IRDAI directed refund within 30 days; she received Rs 9.84 lakh - the only deduction was stamp duty Rs 1,500 and 13 days of mortality risk Rs 154. Bank manager was issued a warning by the insurer's nodal office.
Case 2. Term plan + 4 riders. A young IT professional in Bengaluru bought a Rs 2 crore term cover. The agent loaded a critical-illness rider, an accidental disability rider, a return-of-premium rider, and a waiver-of-premium rider. Annual premium jumped from Rs 18,000 to Rs 47,000. He missed the 15-day window. He filed at Bima Bharosa six months in, under “Policy Servicing - Rider mis-selling”. The insurer refused to remove riders. He escalated to the Insurance Ombudsman, Bengaluru zone. Award: remove all four riders, refund Rs 1.45 lakh of rider premium for the year, continue base term cover. Time from filing to award: 5 months. Cost: zero.
Case 3. Forged signature claim rejection. A 62-year-old in Lucknow died of a heart attack 22 months after his wife had been sold a life policy on him. The widow filed the death claim. Insurer rejected for “non-disclosure of pre-existing hypertension”. The widow looked at the proposal form - the signature in the “applicant” box was clearly forged. She filed at Bima Bharosa and simultaneously at the Insurance Ombudsman, Lucknow zone, under “Claim - non-disclosure dispute”. She attached three specimen signatures from her husband's passport, PAN card, and Aadhaar. Ombudsman ordered handwriting comparison - signature on proposal form did not match. Award: full sum assured of Rs 25 lakh plus Rs 1 lakh for harassment. The agent's licence was suspended.
From the date you receive the policy bond, not the date you paid premium and not the date the policy was issued by the insurer. Keep the courier slip or the email timestamp. From 1 April 2024 onwards, the free-look window is 30 days for all individual life and health policies (online or offline), under the IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders' Interests, Operations and Allied Matters of Insurers) Regulations, 2024.
No, if it is within the window and the policy is in your name. Regulation 6(2) of POPI 2017 is mandatory; the only deductions allowed are stamp duty, pro-rated risk cover for the days the policy was in force, and any medical examination cost incurred. If the insurer refuses outright, that itself is a Bima Bharosa ground under “Policy Servicing”.
Yes, but the route is different. After the window, you file at Bima Bharosa under “Unfair Business Practices” or “Policy Servicing” and seek cancellation with refund on grounds of mis-selling. The Insurance Ombudsman has awarded such refunds in many cases - see Smt. Manju Devi v. LIC of India at the Lucknow Ombudsman. Outcomes depend on evidence of mis-representation. Read our insurance claim rejection recovery guide for evidence-gathering tips.
No. IGMS (Integrated Grievance Management System) ran from 2010 to 2023. IRDAI replaced it with Bima Bharosa in mid-2023 to widen access, add multi-language support, and integrate with the new Bima Sugam platform under construction. Old IGMS complaint numbers were migrated; the URL bimabharosa.irdai.gov.in is the only live portal.
IRDAI's toll-free policyholder helpline - 155255 or 1800 4254 732 - operational 8 am to 8 pm IST. The helpline registers grievances on Bima Bharosa on your behalf if you cannot use the portal. Useful for senior citizens. The agent asks for your policy number and a verbal description; you receive an SMS with the token.
At the Insurance Ombudsman, yes, but capped under Rule 17 of RPG 2017 - typically up to Rs 1 lakh in addition to the main award. At the consumer commission, the cap is higher and depends on the commission's discretion under Section 39 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019. The leading authority is General Insurance Co. v. Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680.
No. Only public-sector insurers (LIC, four PSU general insurers, AIC, ECGC, GIC Re) are public authorities under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act 2005. For private insurers, you cannot file RTI directly - but you can file RTI to IRDAI for inspection reports, complaint statistics, and regulatory action on the private insurer. See our citizen RTI playbook for the route.
The Banking Ombudsman (now RB-IOS 2021) handles banks, NBFCs, prepaid wallets, and credit information companies under the Reserve Bank's authority. The Insurance Ombudsman under RPG 2017 handles only insurers and insurance intermediaries. If a bank sold you mis-sold insurance - bancassurance mis-selling - the right forum is the Insurance Ombudsman, not the banking one. The bank's role triggers an additional RBI complaint at cms.rbi.org.in, but the refund of premium is an insurance matter. Our RB-IOS 2021 walkthrough explains the bank side; for the basic complaint mechanics see banking ombudsman complaint guide.
Pre-ticked checkboxes adding riders, fake countdown timers, hidden surrender clauses behind a “more info” link - all of these are now dark patterns notified under the Consumer Protection Authority's Guidelines for Prevention and Regulation of Dark Patterns, 2023. You can file at Bima Bharosa for the insurance side and at the National Consumer Helpline (NCH 1915) for the dark-pattern side. Read our dark patterns CCPA 2023 guide for the parallel route.
There is no internal appeal on Bima Bharosa. The next forum is the Insurance Ombudsman under RPG 2017 - within one year of the insurer's reply. The ombudsman's award is binding on the insurer; you can accept or reject. If you reject, the consumer commission door is open under the Consumer Protection Act 2019 within two years of cause of action.
Last reviewed: 2026-05-15. Editorial - RTI Wiki team. Not legal advice. For binding opinion consult a registered legal practitioner or the Insurance Ombudsman of your zone.