Direct answer. When a Member of Parliament or Member of Legislative Assembly refers a citizen's issue to a public authority and the issue is not resolved in reasonable time, file a free RTI to the PIO asking for the file opened on the reference, the action-taken report and the names of officers responsible. The PIO must reply in 30 days.
Drafting notes. This is a sample application. Customise each item before filing. See Guide for applicants for procedure, fee, and appeal path. After 14 November 2025, requests seeking information about a named individual engage Section 8(1)(j) as amended by Section 44(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. See the practitioner note for the test the Public Information Officer must apply.
To,
The Public Information Officer
[Public Authority where MP referred the issue]
[Full Address, Pin Code]
Sub: Request for information under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005,
regarding action taken on the reference made by Hon'ble MP /
MLA on a citizen issue.
Sir / Madam,
Hon'ble [Member of Parliament / Member of Legislative Assembly]
Shri / Smt ____________ had referred the issue described below to
your office vide letter dated ____________. I am the affected
citizen / petitioner. I seek the following information.
Reference details:
MP / MLA name: ____________
MP / MLA letter number and date: ____________
Subject of reference: ____________
Affected citizen: ____________
Information sought:
[1] Certified copy of the file opened in your office on the said
reference, including all notings.
[2] Certified copy of the action-taken report sent to the MP / MLA
or to the citizen, if any.
[3] Reasons in writing for delay in disposal of the issue beyond
the time-frame in the Citizens' Charter or service norms.
[4] Names, designations and office addresses of officers who have
handled the file.
[5] Whether any reply has been issued to the MP / MLA. Date and
copy of the reply.
[6] Names of officers whose assistance is sought by the PIO under
Section 5(4) of the RTI Act.
Application fee of Rs 10 is enclosed. Please send the information to
the address below.
Yours faithfully,
[Signature]
[Name, address]
[Phone, email]
[Date]
[Date]
To,
The First Appellate Authority
[Public Authority Name]
[Address]
Sub: First appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act, 2005, against
the order of the PIO dated [____] / against deemed refusal
under Section 7(2), in respect of my RTI dated [____].
Sir / Madam,
1. I had filed an RTI application dated [____] seeking the
information described in the enclosure (Annexure A).
2. The PIO has [refused / not replied / partly replied] vide letter
dated [____]. The reply does not satisfy the requirements of
Sections 7(8) and 8 of the RTI Act, 2005, for the reasons set
out below.
3. Grounds of appeal:
(a) The reply does not record reasons for refusal, contrary to
Section 7(8) and Section 19(5).
(b) The PIO has not applied Section 8(2) public-interest
balancing.
(c) Severable parts under Section 10 have not been supplied.
(d) [add specific factual grounds].
4. Prayer: I pray that the FAA may be pleased to direct the PIO to
supply the information sought, free of cost under Section 7(6),
and to record findings on PIO conduct.
Yours faithfully,
[Name and signature]
[Address, phone, email]
Yes. The file noting on the public-authority side, the action-taken report and the reply to the MP or MLA are public records. Section 8(1)© breach-of-privilege concerns are narrow and rarely apply to a routine reference.
Yes. The right under Section 6(1) is for any citizen. The MP's reference is the public authority's record; you have a stake as the affected citizen.
Files in a Minister's office that are in the official record-room are public-authority records. The PIO can call them under Section 5(4). A bare claim of 'with Minister' is not a Section 8 ground.
Last reviewed: 9 May 2026. Sources verified: statutory references and portal links cross-checked on 9 May 2026.