If you are a foreign national whose stay in India runs past 180 days, your registration must now be finished before that 180 day period expires. Until 1 June 2026 the rules let you register within fourteen days after the 180 day mark had already gone by. A Ministry of Home Affairs notification of that date deleted those fourteen days, and it came into force on the day it was published, so it is live law today.
| What it covers | Before 1 June 2026 | From 1 June 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Third proviso to rule 12(1) | register “within fourteen days after the expiry of one hundred and eighty days of his arrival in India” | register “any time before the expiry of the said period of one hundred and eighty days” |
| Practical effect | a short cushion sitting after the 180 day mark | no cushion, the count itself is the deadline |
| Fourth proviso to rule 12(1) | did not carry these words | now ends with the words “but such registration shall be granted only in emergent circumstances” |
| Rule 21(5) | an earlier sub-rule, now replaced | appeal to the Commissioner, Bureau of Immigration, in electronic mode |
| Rule 18(6) | “but beyond twenty-four hours” | “but not beyond twenty-four hours” |
Every cell above comes from one document: G.S.R. 424(E) dated 1 June 2026, the Immigration and Foreigners (Amendment) Rules, 2026, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, sub-section (i). It is signed by the Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Home Affairs under file number 25022/03/2025-F.I.
Section 6 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 (13 of 2025) is short and it delegates everything: “The foreigners on arrival in India shall be required to register with the Registration Officer concerned, subject to such conditions and in such manner as may be prescribed.”
The conditions and the manner are prescribed in the Immigration and Foreigners Rules, 2025, notified by G.S.R. 596(E) dated 1 September 2025. Rule 12 of those rules carries the registration machinery. The 1 June 2026 amendment was made using the rule making power in section 30 of the Act, and it amends only rules 12, 18 and 21. Nothing else in the 2025 rules was touched.
The deadline that moved sits in a rule, not in the Act, so the words that bind you are the amended words quoted in the table above.
Take a hypothetical case. A spouse of an Indian citizen arrives in India on 12 March 2027 on a long stay visa and expects to remain well beyond six months. Counting 180 days forward from 12 March 2027 lands on 8 September 2027.
Under the old wording, registering a fortnight after that date was still inside the proviso. After 1 June 2026 it is not.
One honest caution. The notification does not say whether the day of arrival counts as day one or day zero, and neither does the sentence it inserts. That single day of ambiguity is why you should not plan to file on the last possible afternoon. Treat 180 as a ceiling, not a target date.
The fourth proviso to rule 12(1) now closes with the words “but such registration shall be granted only in emergent circumstances”. Whatever late registration that proviso allowed has stopped being routine. It is an exception somebody has to decide you deserve.
If your application is already filed and simply not moving, the companion page on FRRO delays and escalation deals with that separate problem.
The same notification inserts two provisos into rule 12(2). Read them together, because they are a carve out and a duty that follows it.
The first says that sub-rule (2) “shall not apply in cases wherein either of the parent is an Indian citizen and such parent wishes to retain the Indian citizenship of the child under section 3 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (57 of 1955)”. So a mixed nationality family that intends to keep the child Indian is taken out of that sub-rule.
The second attaches a reporting duty to the carve out. If the child later acquires the citizenship of a foreign country while in India, “either of the parents shall intimate the position to the Registration Officer within thirty days of acquiring the citizenship of the foreign country by the child”.
Note what the gazette does not do here. It does not reproduce what rule 12(2) requires in the first place, and it does not summarise section 3 of the Citizenship Act. For those, read the principal rules and the Citizenship Act themselves.
This part matters to hotels, guest houses, hostels, landlords and anyone else who houses foreign nationals.
Section 14 of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025 is titled “Power to control places frequented by foreigners”. It lets the civil authority direct the owner or keeper of such premises to close them, to use them only on specified conditions, or to refuse admission to foreigners. Section 14(3) then gives the aggrieved person a right of appeal, within thirty days of the direction, to the Central Government, whose decision is final.
The Act stops there. The new rule 21(5) fills in the plumbing that the statute leaves blank:
And the new rule 21(6) adds procedural protection that the bare section does not contain. On receiving the appeal, the Commissioner must give the party “a reasonable opportunity of being heard”, must “pass a reasoned order”, and must “endeavor to complete the proceedings ordinarily within sixty days from the date of receipt of the appeal”.
Read that carefully. It says endeavor, and it says ordinarily. It is a target, not a guarantee, and no consequence is written into the rule if sixty days pass. That gap is where an RTI application does useful work.
The notification also substitutes words in rule 18(6). The phrase “but beyond twenty-four hours” becomes “but not beyond twenty-four hours”. A single inserted “not” reverses the sense of a twenty four hour limit, which suggests the original was a drafting slip. The gazette prints only the substituted words, so this page will not guess at what the rest of rule 18(6) regulates.
Start with a point people get wrong. Neither the Bureau of Immigration nor a Foreigners Regional Registration Office appears in the Second Schedule to the Right to Information Act, 2005 as it stands on India Code. That schedule is the list section 24 uses to place intelligence and security organisations outside the Act, and it runs from the Intelligence Bureau to the Strategic Forces Command. An RTI application to an immigration office is not barred at the door.
Useful requests, in the order they usually help:
Two limits. Someone else's visa or registration file is personal information and a public information officer will normally refuse it, so read Section 8 exemptions first and test your wording against the exemption analyzer. And an RTI application asks for records that already exist. It is not a way to make an officer answer a question or grant an extension.
You can file an RTI online for a central government office, draft the text with the AI RTI Drafter, and track the reply clock with the RTI deadline calculator. If thirty days pass with no reply, Section 19 first appeal is the next step. For the wider method, see The RTI Playbook.
No. The words “within fourteen days after the expiry of one hundred and eighty days of his arrival in India” were substituted with “any time before the expiry of the said period of one hundred and eighty days” by G.S.R. 424(E) dated 1 June 2026. The extra fortnight is gone.
On 1 June 2026. Rule 1(2) of the amendment rules says they “shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette”, and the notification was published that day. Unlike several 2026 laws that wait for a separate commencement notification, this one needed none.
The notification does not prescribe a consequence and this page will not invent one. What it does say is that registration under the fourth proviso to rule 12(1) “shall be granted only in emergent circumstances”. Treat late registration as discretionary relief you must justify, and ask in writing for the reasons if it is refused.
Not in the situation the new proviso describes. Sub-rule (2) does not apply where either parent is an Indian citizen and that parent wishes to retain the child's Indian citizenship under section 3 of the Citizenship Act, 1955. If the child later takes foreign citizenship while in India, either parent must inform the Registration Officer within thirty days.
Section 14(3) of the Act gives a thirty day appeal to the Central Government. Rule 21(5) as substituted on 1 June 2026 routes it to the Commissioner, Bureau of Immigration, in electronic mode through the designated online portal, and rule 21(6) requires a hearing, a reasoned order, and an effort to finish ordinarily within sixty days.
Yes. Immigration offices are not listed in the Second Schedule to the RTI Act, 2005 as it stands on India Code, so section 24 does not shut them out. Ask for the date of receipt, the current status and the reasons recorded, and keep the request to records rather than opinions.
Every rule, section and quoted phrase on this page was checked against the primary gazette notification and the bare Act on 4 September 2026.