In one line: Section 2(e) of the RTI Act names “competent authorities” who, under Section 28, may make their own rules for the implementation of the Act within their domain. The competent authorities include the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, Speakers and Chairmen of State Legislatures, the Chief Justice of India, Chief Justices of High Courts, the President (for the Supreme Court and certain constitutional offices), and the Governor (for State High Courts).
Section 2(e) identifies the “competent authority” empowered to make rules for their own institution. India's independent Right to Information reference, updated 2026.
Under Section 2(e), the competent authority is:
Competent authorities make their own fee rules, forms, and appellate procedure. Examples of rules that depart from Central Rules:
Each High Court has its own RTI page on its website; the Rules are usually a short PDF on the Gazette.
Judicial-side records (case files, judgments not yet delivered, draft orders) fall under the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and each High Court's judicial rules — separate from RTI. The RTI Act applies to the administrative side of courts (pay bills, leave orders, procurement) per the rules made by the competent authority. See Registrar, Supreme Court of India v. R.S. Misra (Delhi HC, 2017).
If your RTI concerns a High Court, Parliament, or a constitutional authority, first locate the rules made by that competent authority on the institution's own website. Use the fee prescribed there, not the Central Rules.
Last reviewed on: 20 April 2026