Quick Reply: NEET-UG is conducted by the National Testing Agency (NTA). After the exam: scanned OMR sheets and recorded responses are displayed, then the provisional answer key — each open for challenge for a few days at ₹200 per question or response, refunded only if your challenge is upheld. There is no re-evaluation of answers; the challenge windows and the RTI Act are what you have. NTA is a public authority, so when a question dispute or a grievance goes unanswered, an RTI puts the process on record. Template below.
NEET has been the single national gateway to medical and dental seats since 2016, when it replaced AIPMT. One exam, some twenty-odd lakh candidates, and a results machine whose inner workings are largely invisible to the candidate. The design of the challenge process — display, challenge, final key — is the official window into that machine. When the window closes without an answer, the RTI Act opens another one.
The windows are short — days, not weeks. The dates for each event are on neet.nta.nic.in and nta.ac.in; the Information Bulletin for the year (the 2026 one came out on 8 February 2026) is the reference document.
NTA is a testing body under the Ministry of Education and accepts applications under the Act — file online at rtionline.gov.in addressed to NTA, or by post to its CPIO. The anchor case is CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay (Supreme Court, 2011): evaluated answer books and the examination record are “information” under the Act, disclosable to the candidate who sat the exam. The deliberative-process exemption does not stretch to concealing marks, responses or the factual record of what was decided.
To, The Central Public Information Officer, National Testing Agency, [address]. Subject: Application under section 6(1) of the RTI Act 2005 — NEET (UG) [YEAR], application/roll No. [NUMBER] Sir/Madam, Kindly provide: 1. The composition of the Subject Expert Committee that considered the challenge to question [NUMBER] of the NEET (UG) [YEAR] answer key, and the date it met. 2. The minutes or record of the committee's decision on that question, excluding any personal data of members. 3. The number of challenges received against that question, and the number accepted. 4. The date my OMR answer sheet was scanned, the scanner and software used, and the quality-control checks applied. 5. The action taken on my grievance No. [NUMBER] dated [DATE], with file notings. Payment of Rs 10 is made online [reference]. Yours faithfully, [Name, full address, phone, email, date]
Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak's neighbour's daughter — a repeater from Patna — found a physics question in the displayed key whose official answer matched none of the given options. Her challenge was filed inside the window and the fee paid; the final key published a fortnight later carried the same answer, unchanged, with no word on why. An RTI asking for the expert committee's record on that question — question 2 and 3 of the template — produced a reply showing the committee had never actually met on her challenge: the question had been carried over as “no change” in a bulk confirmation. The record went into her representation through NTA's public-grievance channel, and the matter was listed for review. The point of the RTI was not to relitigate physics; it was to find out whether anyone had looked.
Only if the challenge is upheld and reflected in the revised final key. NTA's official language calls it a processing fee; treat refund as the signal your challenge succeeded.
No. NEET-UG has no re-evaluation. The recorded-responses challenge fixes scanning errors; re-marking is not part of the scheme.
Published with the result, category-wise. Any further question about how a cut-off was computed for a quota is askable from the counselling authority by RTI.
Yes — it is a public authority under the Ministry of Education, with a CPIO and an online window through rtionline.gov.in.
The state counselling authority is the public authority; ask for the allotment list logic and your position against the rules it published.
The AI RTI Drafter builds this application from your roll number and question numbers, and the First Appeal Builder writes the day-31 appeal.
Last reviewed: 27 August 2026. Challenge-fee mechanics and windows restated from NTA's published process for the 2026 cycle (bulletin of 8 February 2026); the earlier version's “24-hour OMR window” and “refundable” framing were wrong, and AIPMT gave way to NEET in 2016, not 2017. The answer-sheet RTI position follows the Supreme Court's Aditya Bandopadhyay ruling.