Quick Reply: For a case before the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi: status and orders on the eCourts High Court services portal; certified copies through the court's copy application system, which publishes a ready-list; and the records the registry will not part with — file notings, certified pleadings, administrative files — by RTI to the court's CPIO, ₹10. The court's Right to Information page on its site carries the current rules and designations.
Website: jharkhandhighcourt.nic.in
Case status and orders: eCourts High Court services — select Jharkhand
Certified copies: apply through the court; the certified-copy ready list is published on the site
RTI: to the CPIO, High Court of Jharkhand — procedure on the court's Right to Information page
Fee: ₹10 · Reply: 30 days under Section 7(1)
A High Court is a public authority like any other for its administrative and non-judicial records — and its judicial records are, in any event, public through the copy-application route. The practice point is picking the right door: want the order or the judgment, use certified copies; want the file's movement, a listing decision's basis, or an administrative record, use RTI.
1. The present stage of my copy application no. _____ dated _____, and the date by which the certified copy will be ready. 2. The date of the last hearing in Case _____ (type, number, year), the purpose shown, and the next date fixed. 3. The reasons for the delay in _____ (matter) beyond the timelines in the court's own rules, rule-wise. 4. A copy of the noting or file movement on my application for _____ for the past 30 days. 5. The name and designation of the officer holding the file.
Real example. Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak's certified copy of a pension-related order was “under process” for six weeks. Question 1 above brought back a reply showing the file had gone to the typing pool and returned unsigned — with the officer named. The copy was ready in four days; the reply itself was the prod.
A word on the district judiciary: the High Court of Jharkhand supervises the subordinate courts of the State, but each district court is its own record-keeper — an RTI for a district-court file goes to that court's CPIO, not to the High Court. The eCourts services portal covers both layers for case status, so the tracking door is common even where the records are separate.
Yes — it is a public authority; judicial records are better taken as certified copies, and administrative records by RTI.
Copies of pleadings and orders are issued per the court's copy rules to persons with a lawful interest; RTI reaches records subject to the Act's exemptions, including privacy under Section 8(1)(j).
On the court's site and the eCourts High Court services portal — both free and updated.
RTI question 1 above, then the first appeal — copy readiness is a record, and the ready-list makes delay deniable-proof. Quote the copy application number and its date in both.
Last reviewed: 26 August 2026. The court's site, its eCourts services link and its Right to Information page were verified live this run.