Direct answer: A “deemed refusal” occurs when a Public Information Officer (PIO) does not provide information within the statutory 30-day deadline under §7(1) of the RTI Act, 2005. Silence is treated in law as a refusal — giving the applicant an immediate right to file a First Appeal under §19(1).
When you file an RTI application, the law gives the PIO a maximum of 30 days to respond. If day 31 arrives and you have received nothing — no information, no refusal letter, no “more time needed” notice — the law automatically treats this as if the PIO had expressly refused your request. This is the “deemed refusal.”
Example: Priya files an RTI to the District Collectorate on 1 May 2026. The PIO is obligated to reply by 30 May. On 31 May, Priya has no response in her inbox and no Speed Post letter. Her application is now a deemed refusal — she can file a First Appeal without waiting any longer.
The purpose is protective: it prevents PIOs from simply “not responding” as a tactic to avoid disclosure. A deemed refusal is just as actionable as an explicit refusal.
Count 30 days from the date the PIO received your application (use your Speed Post AD card or portal tracking). If the 30th day has passed and you have no response, you have a deemed refusal. For online applications, the portal receipt date is Day 0.
If you used Speed Post with AD, the AD card is proof of delivery. For online applications, the portal-generated registration number is proof. A PIO cannot use alleged non-receipt as a defence if delivery is evidenced.
Cite §7(1) (deadline) and §7(2) (deemed refusal): “The PIO failed to respond within the §7(1) statutory deadline of 30 days. The application is, by operation of §7(2), a deemed refusal. I appeal under §19(1) and request the FAA to direct disclosure and initiate §20 penalty proceedings.” The First Appeal Builder auto-generates this.
Last reviewed: May 2026. Part of the RTI Wiki definitions series.