Why trust this course — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026

RTI Wiki is a plain-language reference on the RTI Act, 2005, maintained by a working editorial team. It grew from a practitioner's own case notes into a broad, actively updated reference on the Act.

What that maintenance means in practice:

• Every major amendment tracked, in context. The 2019 Commissioner amendments. The DPDP Act, 2023. The DPDP Rules, 2025, notified 14 November 2025 — all read against §8(1)(j) and §8(2) as actually implemented. The course reflects the post-14-November-2025 framework as it stands in 2026.
• Every significant Supreme Court and High Court ruling, indexed by section and summarised for working PIOs and FAAs. Aditya Bandopadhyay, Thalappalam, Girish Deshpande, Jayantilal Mistry, Subhash Chandra Agarwal (CJI office), Puttaswamy, ADR (Electoral Bonds), R.K. Jain, Namit Sharma, Khanapuram Gandaiah — each with a dedicated article you can cross-check.
• No sponsored content has ever been run on statutory interpretation. Advertisements appear in limited slots on some pages; the editorial remains independent and the course contains no ad placements.

Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak — editor of RTI Wiki, with a long-running editorial focus on RTI and administrative law. Author of the PIO Reply Guide, FAA Speaking-Order Guide, Grounds for Rejection decision tree, and PIO / FAA Knowledge Base.

For professional background, teaching positions and publications, see the instructor's page.

Not a slide deck. Not an opinion. The course is built on the live editorial corpus of RTI Wiki — which you can verify before, during, or after enrolment.

• Practitioner articles on the Act, each reviewed and dated. Every module of the course links to its source articles so you can read past the summary.
• Case-law anchors — every claim in the quiz questions is traceable to a named judgment.
• Drafting templates — first RTI, first appeal, second appeal, PIO reply (standard, partial denial, §11 notice), FAA speaking order, §10 severance order, §7(3) fee intimation, §20 response, and more.
• State/UT procedure pages — covering fee, portal, language, and appeal routes for every Indian state and Union Territory.

Honest breakdown (without sharing any personal data):

• PIOs and FAAs from Union ministries, state secretariats, PSUs, universities, urban local bodies, and public-sector banks — people who draft reasoned orders under time pressure.
• Citizen activists — including many seasoned petitioners who cite our section-wise summaries in Commission hearings.
• Advocates — as a structured cross-reference alongside SCC and Manupatra.
• Information Commissioners and their research staff — particularly our case-law summary pages.
• Law and Public-Administration students — preparing for PhD, LLM, and competitive examinations.
• Journalists — using us to cross-check RTI-related reporting on rejections, appeals, and penalties.

We do not sell this list, track individuals, or share analytics. We mention it here only so you know who else is reading the same sentences you will read in the course.

• Case-law anchored, not opinion-anchored. Every module ends with at least 2 case citations. Every quiz question is traceable to a named ruling or a specific sub-clause.
• Post-DPDP 2025 framework, not pre-2025. Many online RTI resources still cite the old §8(1)(j) proviso. This course teaches the amended framework as it stands on 14 November 2025.
• Drafting-first, not theory-first. Every module comes with a copy-ready template and a “five-line reasoned-order formula” that survives First and Second Appeal.
• Tab-locked, time-limited final exam. No open-book loophole. You earn the certificate.
• Free, forever, under a promotional-launch frame. The corpus is free on the site; a course built on the free corpus is also free.

• Search presence. For queries like “section 8(1)(j) RTI”, “RTI first appeal template”, “RTI fees by state”, “landmark RTI case law” — RTI Wiki pages rank on the first page across major search engines. That reach was built article-by-article, not by marketing spend.
• Citation pattern. Our article slugs appear in filings, appellate submissions, writ petitions, and Commission orders — typically as a plain-language pointer before a formal SCR / Manupatra citation. We do not track who cites us; but we read the orders, and the pattern is recurring.
• Editorial independence. No paywall on the Act itself — the wiki has always been open.

We think “trust us” is the weakest argument anyone can make. So:

1. Read before you enrol. Open any of our pillar articles (PIO Reply Guide, FAA Speaking-Order Guide, Grounds for Rejection). Judge the quality of the reasoning yourself.
2. Cross-check the citations. Every case in the course is reported. Pick any three; look them up on Supreme Court Judis or Manupatra; see whether our ratio is accurate.
3. Ask a working PIO or advocate you know. Ask whether they have used RTI Wiki. In our experience, more than half say yes.
4. Start with Module 1 — the quiz is free, the reading is free, the certificate costs you nothing. The only real cost is your time — and you get to judge whether the time was well spent.

• We are not a statutory body. We do not issue government certificates.
• We are not the final word on the Act. The Information Commissions, the High Courts, and the Supreme Court are.
• We will not tell you we are infallible. If you find an error in the course, flag it — we fix it, we attribute the correction on the article's history.

• Course home
• What you get — certificate value
• About the instructor
• Full curriculum
• Report a correction

Last reviewed: 21 April 2026.