CNAP (Calling Name Presentation) — complete guide on caller name display and how to opt out in India:
Step 1: What is CNAP? (a) CNAP (Calling Name Presentation) is a proposed telecom feature — where the recipient's phone displays the name of the caller — as registered with the telecom operator — even if the recipient has not saved the caller's number, (b) the TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) has recommended CNAP — to curb spam calls, fraud calls, and robocalls — by displaying the caller's registered name — so that the recipient can identify the caller — and decide whether to answer, © the CNAP name is sourced from: (i) the KYC records (the name submitted by the subscriber — at the time of getting the SIM card — through Aadhaar or other KYC), (ii) the CPF (Customer Acquisition Form) — submitted to the telecom operator, (d) the CNAP is similar to Truecaller — but is provided by the telecom operator — based on the official KYC records — and is more accurate — and more reliable — than Truecaller.
Step 2: Privacy concerns. (a) the CNAP raises significant privacy concerns — because: (i) the caller's name is displayed to the recipient — without the caller's consent — even if the caller has not shared the name — and even if the caller has not saved the recipient's number, (ii) the name is sourced from the KYC records — which contain the Aadhaar name — and the address — and the photo — which are sensitive personal information, (iii) the CNAP can be misused — by stalkers, fraudsters, and harassers — who can identify the caller — and use the name for phishing, extortion, or harassment, (iv) the CNAP can expose journalists, activists, whistleblowers, and vulnerable individuals — who need to make anonymous calls — for their safety, (b) the privacy advocates have argued that: (i) the CNAP violates the right to privacy — under Article 21 of the Constitution — and the Puttaswamy judgment (2017), (ii) the CNAP is a disproportionate restriction — on the caller's privacy — because there are less intrusive alternatives — like DLT (Distributed Ledger Technology) — for spam control, (iii) the CNAP should be opt-in — not opt-out — to respect the caller's consent.
Step 3: How to opt out. (a) the TRAI has recommended that the subscriber should have the option to opt out of CNAP — so that the name is not displayed — to the recipient, (b) the opt-out process (as proposed): (i) the subscriber can opt out — through the telecom operator's app (MyJio, Airtel Thanks, Vi App, BSNL self-care), (ii) the subscriber can opt out — through the telecom operator's website (by logging in — and navigating to the CNAP settings), (iii) the subscriber can opt out — by sending an SMS (to the telecom operator's short code — with the opt-out keyword — e.g., “CNAP OFF” — to [number]), (iv) the subscriber can opt out — by calling the customer care (and requesting the opt-out), © the opt-out is expected to be free (the TRAI has recommended that the opt-out should not attract any fee — and the telecom operator should not charge for the opt-out), (d) the opt-out is revocable (the subscriber can opt back in — at any time — through the same process), (e) the opt-out status (once opted out — the caller's name will not be displayed — to any recipient — and the recipient will see only the number — or “Private Number” — or “Unknown”).
Step 4: TRAI recommendations and status. (a) the TRAI issued a consultation paper on CNAP (in 2022 — and submitted recommendations to the Department of Telecommunications — in 2023), (b) the TRAI recommended: (i) the CNAP should be implemented by all telecom operators (Jio, Airtel, Vi, BSNL — for all subscribers — by default), (ii) the subscriber should have the option to opt out (to protect privacy — and the opt-out should be free — and easy), (iii) the name should be sourced from the KYC records (and should be accurate — and up-to-date), (iv) the CNAP should not apply to emergency numbers (100, 101, 102, 108, 112 — and to government helplines — which should display the official name), © the Department of Telecommunications is considering the recommendations (and is in consultation with the telecom operators — on the implementation — and the timeline — and the privacy safeguards), (d) as of 2026, the CNAP has not been fully implemented — and the telecom operators are in the trial phase — and the opt-out mechanism is being developed.
Step 5: File RTI. File RTI with: (a) the TRAI asking for: (i) the CNAP recommendations (the full text — and the date — and the status of implementation), (ii) the privacy safeguards (the opt-out mechanism — and the process — and the timeline), (iii) the consultation with stakeholders (the submissions received — and the meetings — and the minutes), (iv) the trial status (the telecom operators conducting trials — and the results — and the timeline for full rollout), (b) the Department of Telecommunications asking for: (i) the implementation status (whether the DoT has approved the CNAP — and the timeline — and the notification), (ii) the privacy impact assessment (whether the DoT has conducted a PIA — and the findings — and the safeguards), (iii) the opt-out mechanism (the process — and the telecom operators' compliance — and the timeline), © the telecom operator (if it is a public sector operator — BSNL/MTNL — which are public authorities under the RTI Act) asking for: (i) the CNAP implementation status (and the trial results — and the timeline), (ii) the opt-out mechanism (the process — and the availability — and the fee — if any), (iii) the KYC data sharing (whether the operator is sharing the KYC data — for CNAP — and the safeguards).
Step 6: Alternatives to CNAP for spam control. (a) DLT (Distributed Ledger Technology): the TRAI's DLT platform — for scrubbing spam — by registering headers and templates — and blocking unregistered commercial communications, (b) the TRAI DND app (Do Not Disturb — the consumer can register — and block commercial calls — and report spam), © Truecaller and similar apps (the third-party caller ID apps — which rely on crowd-sourced data — and are less accurate — and raise privacy concerns), (d) call blocking (the smartphone's built-in call blocking — and spam filtering — which can block known spam numbers), (e) the telecom operator's spam filter (Jio, Airtel, Vi — have spam filters — that identify and block spam calls — based on AI and machine learning).
Step 7: Practical tips. (a) opt out if you value privacy (if you do not want your name displayed — to strangers — opt out — through the telecom operator's app — or website — or SMS — or customer care), (b) check the TRAI website (for the latest recommendations — and the implementation status — and the opt-out mechanism), © file RTI (to get the implementation status — and the privacy safeguards — and the opt-out mechanism — if the telecom operator does not provide the opt-out), (d) use DND (register on the TRAI DND — to reduce spam calls — and report spam — to the TRAI), (e) be cautious (even with CNAP — fraudsters can spoof names — or use fake KYC — so verify the caller — before sharing any information — or making any payment), (f) Example: A journalist was concerned that CNAP would expose her identity — to sources — and to suspects — she filed RTI with the TRAI — asking for the opt-out mechanism — the reply showed that the opt-out was available — through the telecom operator's app — she opted out — and her name was not displayed — to recipients — protecting her identity — and her safety.