If the Collector's land acquisition award is too low, you can challenge the amount by applying in writing for a reference under Section 64 of the RFCTLARR Act 2013, so a Land Acquisition Authority re-decides your compensation. Do not accept the award unconditionally; either refuse it or accept it under protest, then file your Section 64 application within the time limit, stating the grounds why the amount is wrong.
This guide is for any landowner or interested person, like a farmer whose land was taken for a highway, irrigation canal, industrial corridor or township, who believes the compensation in the Collector's award is far below the real market value of the land. It explains how to dispute the quantum (the amount), not delay in payment. If your problem is that payment is late or has gone to the wrong claimant, see the companion guide on delayed or wrongly-paid land acquisition compensation instead.
Most land acquisitions today are governed by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (commonly called the RFCTLARR Act or LARR Act 2013). It came into force on 1 January 2014 and repealed the old Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The 2013 Act was designed to give far higher and fairer compensation than the 1894 law.
Under the 2013 Act, the Collector first publishes an award stating how much compensation each landowner gets. If you think that figure is too low, Section 64 is your route to a fresh, independent determination. It lets a person interested who has not accepted the award apply in writing to the Collector and require that the matter be referred to the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority (a quasi-judicial body set up under Section 51 of the Act). The Authority then determines the dispute under Section 69, and can enhance the compensation.
A Section 64 reference is not only about the amount. You can object to:
For a “compensation too low” complaint, your ground is the amount.
Knowing how the law builds the figure helps you show the Authority that the award is short. Under the 2013 Act, compensation is the market value plus extras, not just the bare market value:
| Component | What it is |
|---|---|
| Market value | The base value of the land, worked out under Section 26. |
| Multiplication factor (First Schedule) | In rural areas the market value is multiplied by a factor from 1 up to 2, depending on distance from the nearest urban centre. In urban areas the factor is generally 1. |
| Value of assets | Value of buildings, trees, crops, wells and other things attached to the land. |
| Solatium (Section 30) | 100% of (market value x factor + value of assets), added on top, to recognise the compulsory nature of the acquisition. |
So a low award usually means the Collector understated the market value, applied the wrong multiplier, or missed the value of structures and trees. These are exactly the points your Section 64 application should attack.
The application must reach the Collector in time, or it can be rejected as barred. The deadline depends on whether you were present when the award was made.
| Your situation | Deadline to file the Section 64 application |
|---|---|
| You were present or represented before the Collector when the award was made | Within six weeks from the date of the Collector's award |
| You were not present | Within six weeks of receiving the Collector's notice, OR within six months from the date of the award, whichever expires first |
| You missed the deadline | The Collector may still entertain the application within a further period of one year if satisfied there was sufficient cause for the delay |
Because the windows are short, prepare and file as soon as the award is announced. Do not wait.
The Authority decides on evidence, so the quality of your proof matters more than how strongly you feel the award is unfair. Strong material includes:
This is a simple illustration of the maths, not a real case. Suppose a rural plot is valued at a market value of 10,00,000 rupees, and because it is close to town the multiplication factor is 1.5. The value of trees and a well on it is 1,00,000 rupees. The base becomes (10,00,000 x 1.5) + 1,00,000 = 16,00,000 rupees. Add 100% solatium of 16,00,000 rupees, and the compensation works out to 32,00,000 rupees. If the Collector's award only counted 10,00,000 rupees of bare market value with no proper multiplier or solatium, a Section 64 reference is the way to claim the rest.
Only if you took it under protest. If you accepted the award unconditionally, you generally give up the right to seek more. So always record, in writing, that you are accepting the money under protest, and then file your Section 64 application within the time limit.
If you were present when the award was made, six weeks from the date of the award. If you were not present, six weeks from receiving the Collector's notice or six months from the award date, whichever expires first. The Collector can condone delay up to a further one year for sufficient cause.
The Collector must make the reference to the Authority within thirty days of a valid application. If the Collector does not, you can apply directly to the Authority and ask it to direct the Collector to make the reference within thirty days. Courts have held the Collector has no discretion to refuse a properly made reference.
There is no fixed figure. The Authority recalculates compensation as market value multiplied by the First Schedule factor (1 to 2 in rural areas, generally 1 in urban areas), plus the value of assets, plus 100% solatium under Section 30. If the Collector understated any of these, the enhancement can be substantial.
No. The 2013 Act bars the jurisdiction of civil courts over matters the Authority is empowered to determine. Your route for disputing the amount is the Section 64 reference to the Authority, and then an appeal to the High Court under Section 74.
Yes. Section 64 is about disputing the quantum, that the amount is too low. If your money is simply late, or has been paid to the wrong person, that is a different problem handled differently. See the guide on delayed or wrongly-paid land acquisition compensation.
If your acquisition award looks low, act fast: get a certified copy of the award, refuse it or accept under protest, and start collecting comparable sale deeds and circle-rate proof immediately. Draft your Section 64 application stating the amount as your ground, and file it with the Collector well inside the six-week or six-month window. Keep the acknowledgement. If the Collector stalls, approach the Authority directly. For a deeper, plain-language understanding of how to use your information and appeal rights against the government, read The RTI Playbook.