Yes, a long-serving government casual or temporary-status worker can be entitled to pension on retirement even if a formal regularisation order was never passed. On 1 June 2026, in Bhikhani Devi & Etc. v. Union of India, 2026 INSC 612, the Supreme Court held that a temporary-status casual labourer is entitled to pensionary benefits on superannuation even in the absence of regularisation. The right flows from the years of service actually rendered, not from a piece of paper confirming a permanent post.
In one line: Three years of continuous service under temporary status puts a casual worker on par with a temporary Group D employee. Pension then follows under the central pension rules on completing the prescribed qualifying service, with no separate regularisation order required.
This judgment helps government casual and temporary-status workers who were kept on the rolls for years but never received a formal regularisation order. You are most likely to benefit if:
The crucial point to understand: three years of continuous temporary-status service does not by itself hand you a pension. It gives you the status of a temporary Group D employee. Pension is then earned on completing the separate, longer qualifying period that the pension rules prescribe.
The two-judge Bench of Justice Sanjay Karol and Justice Augustine George Masih answered the question directly. In paragraph 76 the Court recorded:
“A temporary status casual labourer would be entitled to pensionary benefits on superannuation even in the absence of regularisation.”
Three threads run through the reasoning:
So the absence of a regularisation order is not a valid ground to deny pension to a worker who has actually rendered the service the rules require.
If you retired or are about to retire from government casual or temporary-status service, here is a practical sequence.
Illustration (fictional). Dr. Shrawan Kumar Pathak joined a central government workshop as a casual labourer and was conferred temporary status after three years of continuous service. He kept working for over a decade and retired on superannuation, but the department refused pension because his post was never regularised. Relying on Bhikhani Devi v. Union of India, 2026 INSC 612, he files a representation showing more than ten years of temporary service. Because pension is a deferred wage earned through that service, the missing regularisation order is no longer a valid reason to deny him pension. (Names are illustrative only.)
Yes. The Supreme Court in 2026 INSC 612 held that a temporary-status casual labourer is entitled to pensionary benefits on superannuation even in the absence of a formal regularisation order, provided the required service has been rendered.
No. Three years of continuous service under temporary status puts you on par with a temporary Group D employee. Pension itself follows under the central pension rules after you complete the separate qualifying service those rules prescribe.
The Court cited Rule 10(1-B) of the CCS (Temporary Service) Rules, under which a temporary government servant who retires on superannuation after rendering temporary service of not less than ten years is entitled to superannuation pension, retirement gratuity, and family pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.
Because pension is treated as earnings set aside from years of work, not a favour. The Court held pension is not a matter of grace dependent on the employer's financial convenience, but a deferred wage earned through long years of service.
File an RTI application for certified copies of your service register, muster rolls, attendance and wage registers, and the order conferring temporary status. These records establish continuity of service, which is central to a pension claim.
A wrongful refusal of pensionary benefits to a government servant is generally challenged before the Central Administrative Tribunal, with a further remedy in the High Court, citing 2026 INSC 612 as the governing precedent.