Supreme Court of India · 2011-12-12 · (2011) 15 SCC 1 · ★ Landmark
§18 complaint ≠ §19 appeal. Commission cannot direct disclosure of information under §18; only §19 permits that.
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
|---|---|
| Decided | 2011-12-12 |
| Citation | (2011) 15 SCC 1 |
| Bench | Aftab Alam, Ranjana Prakash Desai |
| Petitioner | Chief Information Commissioner |
| Respondent | State of Manipur & Anr. |
| RTI Act sections | §18, §19 |
| Outcome | Partly allowed |
Section 18 (complaint) and Section 19 (appeal) operate in different fields; Commission cannot order disclosure in a §18 complaint.
The powers of the Commission under §18 (complaint) and §19 (appeal) are distinct. A complaint under §18 is meant for procedural grievances; substantive orders directing disclosure can be made only in an appeal under §19.
§18, §19, complaint, appeal, Commission powers
These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.
Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.