Section 27 was amended by the Right to Information (Amendment) Act, 2019 (No. 24 of 2019), in force from 24 October 2019. New clauses were inserted after clause © of sub-section (2), empowering the Central Government to prescribe by rules the term of office and the salaries, allowances and other terms and conditions of service of the Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners — Centre and States (under §§13(1), 13(2), 13(5), 16(1), 16(2), 16(5)). The current terms are prescribed by the Right to Information (Term of Office, Salaries, Allowances and Other Terms and Conditions of Service of Chief Information Commissioner, Information Commissioners and the Chief Information Commissioner and Information Commissioners in State Information Commission) Rules, 2019.
Quick Reply: §27 is where the Act hands the machinery to rules: the appropriate Government (Centre for Central authorities, State for State authorities) makes rules for fees, costs, formats and procedure. Every “₹10 application fee” and “₹2 a page” you have met is a §27 rule. The 2019 amendment added the Commissioners' tenure and salaries to this list — the change that made those terms rule-dependent rather than statute-fixed.
Your State Government, under §27 — each State has its own rules with its own fee schedule; confirm from the State's Gazette or our fee hub.
No — it concerned the Commissioners' tenure and salaries. The application fee rules stand as before.
Only a “competent authority” (Speaker, Chief Justice, etc.) under §28 for its own house; ordinary departments cannot — they apply the Government's §27 rules.
The 2005 Fee and Cost Rules as amended, available on DoPT's site and summarised with live fee positions in our rules pages.
Last reviewed on: 27 August 2026. Verbatim clause list from the current text; the 2019 amendment's exact effect stated; the unverified claims that a named case upheld the amendment — and that an earlier case interpreted this section's scope — dropped; what-rules-cannot-do and demand-the-rule sections added.