Quick Reply: Under §25, each Information Commission prepares an annual report on the Act's implementation, fed by data every ministry and department must supply. The report counts requests, refusal provisions invoked, appeals and outcomes, disciplinary actions, and fees collected — and the Government lays it before Parliament or the legislature. §25(5) adds a quiet weapon: where an authority's practice does not conform to the Act, the Commission can formally recommend the steps to fix it.
The text says “as soon as practicable after the end of each year” (§25(4)) — not a fixed 12-month deadline; delays are common and visible.
Yes — it is exactly the §25(2) data the department must maintain; ask provision-wise for the last year.
It is a formal Commission recommendation directed at a practice; citing a pending or past 25(5) recommendation in an individual appeal shows systemic recognition of the defect.
Yes — the same section applies: SIC report → State Government → laid before the state legislature.
Last reviewed on: 27 August 2026. Misattributed case citation dropped; the invented 12-month laying deadline corrected to the statutory wording; the s.25(5) conformity power and citizen-use sections added.