Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- rules:up:court [2015/09/04 01:07] – Shrawan
+++ rules:up:court [2016/10/29 08:21] (current) – old revision restored (2015/09/04 01:15) Shrawan
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Allahabad High Court (Right to Information) Rules, 2006 ======
-FIXME
+{{tag>Court Rules UttarPradesh}}
-  - Every application shall be made for one particular item of information only.
+{{:rules:up:allahabad-high-court.jpg|}}
+These rules may be called the Allahabad High Court (Right to Information) Rules, 2006
 ===== Application Fees =====
+  - Every application shall be made for one particular item of information only.
   - Each application shall be accompanied by cash or draft or pay order of Rs. 500/- drawn in favour of the Registrar General, High Court, Allahabad, or the District Judge of the concerned District Court as the case might be.
   - If the application is permitted, the applicant shall be entitled to the information only after he makes payment in cash at the rate of Rs. 15/- per page of information to be supplied to him.
@@ Line 24: / Line 26: @@
   - The Central Public Information Officer, prior to taking any decision on any application made under sub section (1) to provide the desired information, shall take into consideration the representation made by the third party, if any.
   - Notwithstanding anything contained anywhere else in these Rules, the applicant will be furnished with the information requested for, if and only if (a) the furnishing of such information is
+    - requested for with a positive assertion that the motive for obtaining such information is proper and legal;
-     - requested for with a positive assertion that the motive for obtaining such information is proper and legal;
+    - in accordance with the provisions of the said Act;
-     - in accordance with the provisions of the said Act;
+    - not likely disproportionately to divert the resource of the High Court or the Subordinate Court, as the case might be;
-     - not likely disproportionately to divert the resource of the High Court or the Subordinate Court, as the case might be;
+    - not likely to be detrimental to the safety or preservation of the record in question and
-     - not likely to be detrimental to the safety or preservation of the record in question and
+    - not otherwise against any law or practice prevailing in the material regard;
-     - not otherwise against any law or practice prevailing in the material regard;
+    - and (b) after the processing of the application therefor, permission has been obtained in that behalf from Hon’ble the Chief Justice, or any of the other Hon’ble Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, or its Lucknow Bench, who might in that regard be, or have been, nominated by Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
-     - and (b) after the processing of the application therefor, permission has been obtained in that behalf from Hon’ble the Chief Justice, or any of the other Hon’ble Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, or its Lucknow Bench, who might in that regard be, or have been, nominated by Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
   - If access is granted to a part of the record only, the Central Public Information Officer shall give a notice to the applicant, informing him:
     - that only part of the record requested, after severance of the record containing information which is exempt from disclosure is being provided;
@@ Line 43: / Line 44: @@
   - If the third party has been given an opportunity to make representation in respect of disclosure of any information, the Central Public Information Officer shall make decision as to whether or not to disclose the information of record or part thereof within forty days after the receipt of the request and give in writing the notice of his decision to the third party. The notice of the decision relating to disclosure of the information to the third party state that such person is entitled to prefer an appeal against the decision.
   - If any person does not receive the desired information or decision for rejecting the request within the time specified in the Act, he/she may prefer an appeal to the appellate authority notified under rules of the Act within thirty days from expiry of the period stipulated in the Act or within thirty days from the receipt of decision of rejection of his request by the Central Public Information Officer.
   - Central Public Information Officer shall not be liable to provide any information, which can be obtained under the provision of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 in case of High Court and under General Rule (Civil/Criminal) in case of subordinate Courts. Such information may be obtained by adhering to the prescribed procedure and payment of fees prescribed in the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952, or General Rules (Civil/Criminal), as the case may be.
   - Central Public Information Officer will not entertain any application from any citizen for providing any information relating to matters, which are pending adjudication before the High Court or Courts subordinate thereto. The information relating to judicial matters may be obtained as per the procedure prescribed in the Allahabad High Court Rules 1952 and General Rules (Civil/Criminal) respectively.
   - Central Public Information Officer will not entertain any application from any citizen for inspection of any record which can be inspected under the Allahabad High Court Rules 1952 and General Rules (Civil/Criminal) as the case may be.
@@ Line 59: / Line 57: @@
   - {{:rules:up:appellate-authority-designation-by-uttar-pradesh-high-court.pdf|Appellate Authority at UP High Court}}
   - {{:rules:up:cpio-information-of-uttar-pradesh-high-court01-10-14.pdf|CPIO designation under Allahabad High Court 1-10-2014}}
+{{like>}}
 ===== External Links =====
   - [[http://www.allahabadhighcourt.in/rti/rti_15-07-13.html|DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION UNDER SECTION 4(1)(b) OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005]]