guide:guidelines-for-first-appellate-authority
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
guide:guidelines-for-first-appellate-authority [2015/08/24 11:27] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation 188.165.15.207 | guide:guidelines-for-first-appellate-authority [2016/04/20 14:18] – Shrawan | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{keywords> | ||
====== Guidelines for First Appellate Authority ====== | ====== Guidelines for First Appellate Authority ====== | ||
+ | {{tag> | ||
+ | {{like> | ||
+ | |||
- {{: | - {{: | ||
- {{: | - {{: | ||
Line 116: | Line 120: | ||
- | Deciding appeals under the RTI Act is a quasi-judicial function. It is, therefore, necessary that the appellate authority should see to it that the justice is not only done but it should also appear to have been done. In order to do so, the order passed by the appellate authority should be a speaking order giving justification for the decision arrived at. | + | Deciding appeals under the RTI Act is a quasi-judicial function. It is, therefore, necessary that the appellate authority should see to it that the justice is not only done but it should also appear to have been done. In order to do so, the order passed by the appellate authority should be a speaking order giving justification for the decision arrived at(({{: |
===== Time Limit for Disposal of Appeal ===== | ===== Time Limit for Disposal of Appeal ===== | ||
Line 125: | Line 129: | ||
If an appellate authority comes to a conclusion that the appellant should be supplied information in addition to what has been supplied to him by the CPIO, he may either (i) pass an order directing the CPIO to give such information to the appellant; or (ii) he himself may give information to the appellant while disposing off the appeal. In the first case the appellate authority should ensure that the information ordered by him to be supplied is supplied to the appellant immediately. It would, however, be better if the appellant authority chooses the second course of action and he himself furnishes the information along with the order passed by him in the matter. | If an appellate authority comes to a conclusion that the appellant should be supplied information in addition to what has been supplied to him by the CPIO, he may either (i) pass an order directing the CPIO to give such information to the appellant; or (ii) he himself may give information to the appellant while disposing off the appeal. In the first case the appellate authority should ensure that the information ordered by him to be supplied is supplied to the appellant immediately. It would, however, be better if the appellant authority chooses the second course of action and he himself furnishes the information along with the order passed by him in the matter. | ||
- | If, in any case, the CPIO does not implement the order passed by the appellant authority and the appellate authority feels that intervention of higher authority is required to get his order implemented, | + | If, in any case, the CPIO does not implement the order passed by the appellant authority and the appellate authority feels that intervention of higher authority is required to get his order implemented, |
guide/guidelines-for-first-appellate-authority.txt · Last modified: 2023/04/15 11:38 by Shrawan