Right to Information Wiki

📖 Citizen Crash Course in RTI

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:07:45 +0000

2026/05/03 11:56	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(citizen rti course, free rti course, beginner rti, first rti, file rti india, rti for citizens, rti certificate, rti crash course, learn rti)&metatag-description=(Free 3-module crash course on the RTI Act, 2005 for first-time citizens. File your first RTI by the end of module 3. Verifiable certificate on completion.)}}
	+
	+	====== 📖 Citizen Crash Course in RTI ======
	+
	+	===== What you'll be able to do after this course =====
	+
	+	* Decide in 30 seconds whether your problem can be solved by an RTI — or needs a different remedy (consumer court, Lokayukta, grievance portal).
	+	* Draft a §6(1) application that survives PIO scrutiny — using plain English, no legal jargon needed.
	+	* Pick the right PIO in your state and post the application correctly (IPO + Speed Post).
	+	* Read the PIO's reply like an insider — spot defects, severability errors, and missing reasons.
	+	* File a §19(1) First Appeal when the PIO refuses or stays silent.
	+
	+	===== Course at a glance =====
	+
	+	\| Modules \| 3 \|
	+	\| Duration \| ~3 hours of reading + practice \|
	+	\| Quizzes \| 10 questions per module · 70% to pass \|
	+	\| Final exam \| 15 questions · 10 minutes · 3 attempts · 70% \|
	+	\| Certificate \| Print-ready · serial CCC-XXXXXXXXXX · verifiable \|
	+	\| Fee \| Free (no statutory cost; only ₹10 if you actually file an RTI) \|
	+	\| Prerequisite \| None — you can read this page \|
	+
	+	===== The 3 modules =====
	+
	+	==== Module 1 — What RTI is, and what it isn't ====
	+
	+	* The Right to Information Act, 2005: history, why it matters
	+	* What you can and cannot ask for (records, not opinions)
	+	* The 4 things every RTI needs: PIO, fee, signature, citizenship
	+	* Common myths debunked
	+	* Quiz · 10 q · 70%
	+
	+	[[:courses:citizen-crash:module-01\|→ Open Module 1]]
	+
	+	==== Module 2 — Drafting + filing ====
	+
	+	* The 4-line template that works for 90% of cases
	+	* How to find the right PIO (Central / state / municipal)
	+	* Fee + payment modes by state
	+	* Speed Post vs online portal
	+	* Tracking + acknowledgement
	+	* Quiz · 10 q · 70%
	+
	+	[[:courses:citizen-crash:module-02\|→ Open Module 2]]
	+
	+	==== Module 3 — Reading replies + first appeal ====
	+
	+	* Anatomy of a good PIO reply
	+	* The 7 ways PIOs (improperly) refuse — and what to say
	+	* §10 severability — what to demand if the PIO refuses the whole record
	+	* Filing First Appeal under §19(1) — template + deadlines
	+	* When to escalate to Second Appeal (CIC/SIC)
	+	* Quiz · 10 q · 70%
	+
	+	[[:courses:citizen-crash:module-03\|→ Open Module 3]]
	+
	+	===== Final exam =====
	+
	+	* 15 questions drawn across all 3 modules
	+	* 10-minute timer · 3 attempts · 70% to pass
	+	* Honor Code + typed signature required
	+	* Tab-switching forfeits the attempt
	+
	+	===== Certificate =====
	+
	+	On passing the final, you receive:
	+
	+	* A print-ready PDF certificate (A4 + letter sizes) with your name, course name, date.
	+	* A unique 10-character serial in format CCC-XXXXXXXXXX.
	+	* A public verification URL at //righttoinformation.wiki/verify-cert?serial=CCC-XXX...//. Anyone can verify your certificate is real.
	+	* A LinkedIn-ready badge image for social profiles.
	+
	+	The certificate is valid for 12 months from issue. To renew, take the 20-question refresher quiz when next year's update is published.
	+
	+	===== Why this course is free =====
	+
	+	RTI was designed for citizens, not for paid intermediaries. We build free tools and free courses because a charge gates the very transparency the RTI Act exists to deliver. We're funded by ads + donations.
	+
	+	If you find it useful, share with one friend (the WhatsApp button at bottom-right is one tap), or [[:donate\|drop us a small donation]] to keep things running.
	+
	+	===== How to start =====
	+
	+	- Log in (or [[doku.php?do=register\|create a free account]]) — your progress and certificate are saved to your account.
	+	- Open Module 1 above. Read end-to-end.
	+	- Mark as read when done. Take the quiz.
	+	- Repeat for Modules 2 and 3.
	+	- Final exam unlocks once all 3 module quizzes are passed.
	+	- Earn your certificate.
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cpd:start\|PIO/FAA CPD Course (advanced)]] — 12 modules, 30 hours
	+	* [[:courses:\|All certified courses]]
	+	* [[:file-rti-help\|I just need help filing now]]
	+	* [[:state-rti-portals-directory\|My state's portal + PIO]]
	+	* [[:tools:ai-rti-draft-app\|🪄 AI Drafter (60-second RTI)]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>course citizen-crash rti free certified}}

Module 01 — What RTI is, and what it isn't

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:07:45 +0000

2026/05/03 11:56	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(citizen crash course module 01, rti module 01, what rti is, and what it isn't)&metatag-description=(Citizen Crash Course in RTI — Module 01: What RTI is, and what it isn't. By the end of this module, you can decide in 30 seconds whether an RTI fits your problem.)}}
	+
	+	====== Module 01 — What RTI is, and what it isn't ======
	+
	+	{{ :social:auto:citizen-crash-module-01.png?direct&1200 \|Citizen Crash Course Module 01}}
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Goal: By the end of this module, you can decide in 30 seconds whether an RTI fits your problem.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	===== A 1-page primer on the RTI Act, 2005 =====
	+
	+	Passed by Parliament in October 2005. Repealed and replaced the older Freedom of Information Act, 2002. Comes into force across India (except Jammu & Kashmir until 2019; now also covered).
	+
	+	The Act has one big idea: //a citizen can ask any public authority for any record it holds, and the authority has 30 days to give it.// 10 specific exemptions exist, but the default is disclosure.
	+
	+	The Act has 6 chapters and 31 sections. As a citizen, you'll mostly use §3, §6, §7, §8, §10, §19, §20.
	+
	+	===== Who is a public authority? (§2(h)) =====
	+
	+	Four kinds:
	+	- Body established by/under the Constitution (e.g. Supreme Court, Election Commission)
	+	- Body established by Parliament/State Act (e.g. RBI, SEBI, AIIMS)
	+	- Body owned, controlled, or substantially financed by Government (PSUs like LIC, BEL)
	+	- NGOs substantially financed by Government
	+
	+	So: police, panchayats, municipal corporations, schools/colleges (govt + aided), hospitals (govt), banks (PSU + RBI), railways, defence (subject to §24), passports, IT, GST — all public authorities.
	+
	+	===== What can you ask for? (§2(f)) =====
	+
	+	Information — defined widely: "//any material in any form, including records, documents, memos, e-mails, opinions, advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contracts, reports, papers, samples, models, data material held in any electronic form//."
	+
	+	Key words: records, documents, data. These are things that already exist at the public authority.
	+
	+	What you cannot ask for: future opinions, hypotheticals, why decisions were made (only what is recorded), or 'how should we…' questions.
	+
	+	===== The 4 things every RTI needs =====
	+
	+	- PIO — addressed to the Public Information Officer of the right department.
	+	- Fee — usually ₹10 by Indian Postal Order (BPL exempt).
	+	- Signature — your handwritten signature with name + address + phone.
	+	- Citizenship — "I am a citizen of India" stated explicitly. Only Indian citizens can file under §3.
	+
	+	===== Myths busted =====
	+
	+	* "You need a lawyer." False. Citizens were the design target. AI Drafter generates a legally-correct application in 60 seconds.
	+	* "You need to state a reason." False. §6(2) explicitly forbids the PIO from asking why you want the information.
	+	* "It costs a lot." False. ₹10 statutory fee. ₹50 in Tamil Nadu/Punjab/Haryana. ₹20 in Gujarat. BPL applicants pay ₹0.
	+	* "Civil servants protected from RTI." False. Service records are disclosable to the extent they form 'public activity' (Deshpande boundary).
	+	* "PIO can refuse without reason." False — that's a §7(8)(i) violation; First Appeal will set it aside.
	+
	+	===== ✅ Quiz =====
	+
	+	10 questions, 70% to pass. Take it from your [[:courses:citizen-crash:app\|course dashboard]].
	+
	+	===== Next =====
	+
	+	* [[:courses:citizen-crash:start\|← Course overview]]
	+	* Next module: [[:courses:citizen-crash:module-02]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>course citizen-crash rti module-01}}

Module 02 — Drafting + filing — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 08:37:01 +0000

2026/05/03 11:56	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(citizen crash course module 02, rti module 02, drafting + filing)&metatag-description=(Citizen Crash Course in RTI — Module 02: Drafting + filing. By the end of this module, you have a draft RTI ready to post.)}}
	+
	+	====== Module 02 — Drafting + filing — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026 ======
	+	{{ :social:auto:citizen-crash-module-02.png?direct&1200 \|Citizen Crash Course Module 02}}
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Goal: By the end of this module, you have a draft RTI ready to post.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Citizen Crash Course in RTI — Module 02: Drafting + filing. By the end of this module, you have a draft RTI ready to post.
	+
	+	===== The 4-line template that works for 90% of cases =====
	+
	+	Open this in a word processor. Fill the bracketed fields. Print + sign + post.
	+
	+	<code>
	+	To,
	+	The Public Information Officer
	+	[Department name]
	+	[Address]
	+
	+	Subject: Application under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005
	+
	+	Sir/Madam,
	+
	+	1. I, [Your name], a citizen of India, residing at [Your address], hereby request the following information under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act, 2005:
	+
	+	(a) [Your specific question 1]
	+	(b) [Your specific question 2]
	+
	+	2. The required fee of Rs. 10 is enclosed by way of Indian Postal Order [IPO no. ___].
	+
	+	3. I am a citizen of India.
	+
	+	Date: [DD-MM-YYYY] Signature: ________
	+	Place: [City] Name: [Your name]
	+	Phone: [Mobile no.]
	+	</code>
	+
	+	===== How to write good questions =====
	+
	+	Bad: "Why is my driving licence delayed?" — asks for opinion, not record.
	+
	+	Good:
	+	* Date my application reference no. [LL-2025-XXX] was received by your office.
	+	* Current status of my application as on [today's date].
	+	* Reasons recorded by the dealing officer for any delay beyond the SOP timeline.
	+	* Name + designation of the dealing officer.
	+	* Backlog of similar applications pending at your office for >30 days.
	+
	+	Pattern: ask for records that exist (status, copies, names, lists, counts). Don't ask why — ask for the reasons recorded.
	+
	+	===== Finding the right PIO =====
	+
	+	- Central matter (passport, IT, EPF, Railways, UIDAI): file via [[https://rtionline.gov.in\|rtionline.gov.in]] (Central RTI portal). UPI ₹10.
	+	- State matter (police, education, health, revenue, RTO): use the [[:state-rti-portals-directory\|state portals page]] on this site. Some states have working portals; others need postal.
	+	- Municipal (water, garbage, property tax, building approval): file with the ULB PIO. See your [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/city/\|city page]].
	+	- PSU (LIC, BEL, BHEL): each has its own PIO — published on PSU website.
	+
	+	If unsure, address to "The Public Information Officer, [Department], [Capital City]" — they're obligated to forward under §6(3) within 5 days.
	+
	+	===== Fee + payment modes by state =====
	+
	+	Standard ₹10 (some states ₹50 or ₹20). Payment modes:
	+	* Indian Postal Order (IPO) — most reliable. Available at any post office. Payable to "Accounts Officer, [department]".
	+	* Demand Draft (DD) — bank-issued.
	+	* UPI / online — for state portals + central portal.
	+	* Court fee stamp — accepted in some states.
	+	* BPL applicants exempt under §7(5) — attach BPL card photocopy.
	+
	+	===== Speed Post vs online portal =====
	+
	+	Online portal (where available — see state portals page):
	+	+ Faster (5 min)
	+	+ Built-in tracking
	+	- Limited to working states
	+	- Some state portals fail to forward to PIO
	+
	+	Speed Post + IPO:
	+	+ Works for everyone
	+	+ AD card = legal proof of receipt
	+	+ Reliable across all 36 states
	+	- Slower (write + post)
	+	- 30-60 min effort
	+
	+	Hybrid (recommended for important RTIs): do both. Counts as one application; doubles reliability.
	+
	+	===== Tracking + acknowledgement =====
	+
	+	* Speed Post — note the consignment number. Track at [[https://www.indiapost.gov.in\|indiapost.gov.in]].
	+	* AD card — Acknowledgement Due — comes back within 7-10 days with PIO's office stamp + signature. Save this. It's your §7(1) clock-start proof.
	+	* Online portal — auto-acknowledges. Save the registration number screenshot.
	+	* Day 30 — if no reply, it's deemed refusal under §7(2). Move to First Appeal.
	+
	+	===== ✅ Quiz =====
	+
	+	10 questions, 70% to pass. Take it from your [[:courses:citizen-crash:app\|course dashboard]].
	+
	+	===== Next =====
	+
	+	* [[:courses:citizen-crash:start\|← Course overview]]
	+	* Next module: [[:courses:citizen-crash:module-03]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>course citizen-crash rti module-02}}

Module 05 — Appeal strategy + lawyer workflow

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:07:45 +0000

2026/05/03 11:56	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(journalists module 05, appeal strategy + lawyer workflow)&metatag-description=(RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course — Module 05: Appeal strategy + lawyer workflow. Run appeals tactically when stories depend on disclosure.)}}
	+
	+	====== Module 05 — Appeal strategy + lawyer workflow ======
	+
	+	{{ :social:auto:journalists-module-05.png?direct&1200 \|RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course Module 05}}
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Goal: Run appeals tactically when stories depend on disclosure.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	===== Appeal as a deadline lever =====
	+
	+	Often the FIRST APPEAL is more important than the original RTI. The FAA is a senior officer who has career incentive to avoid a CIC penalty — a strong First Appeal often gets the disclosure where the PIO refused.
	+
	+	Tactical first appeal: file even if the PIO partially complied — to push for the rest. Costs nothing (no fee for First Appeal). Adds a second lever.
	+
	+	===== CIC/SIC and the 90-day Second Appeal =====
	+
	+	Second Appeal is a longer game (3-12 months). Use only when:
	+	- The story can wait
	+	- The information is central to the story (not nice-to-have)
	+	- The PIO/FAA refusal is so weak that CIC will likely overturn (good odds for §8(1)(d)/(j) overreach)
	+
	+	A Second Appeal hearing also creates a public-interest record at the Commission — the order itself becomes citable.
	+
	+	===== §20 penalty + §19(8)(b) compensation =====
	+
	+	Both are journalistic levers:
	+	- §20: PIO can be personally fined ₹250/day (per-month cap per CIC Shailesh Gandhi 19-Mar-2026). The fine itself is news.
	+	- §19(8)(b): applicant can claim compensation for loss caused by delay/refusal. Useful if the delay killed your story window.
	+
	+	Both must be claimed in the Second Appeal pleadings — don't add them later.
	+
	+	===== Lawyer brief, when needed =====
	+
	+	For PSU-related RTIs, defamation-risk RTIs, or those touching the judiciary:
	+	- 30-min brief with a media lawyer before filing the RTI is cheap insurance.
	+	- Lawyer's role: sanity-check phrasing for §8 vulnerability, advise on whether the story is publishable based on RTI alone, draft Second Appeal if needed.
	+	- Cost: ₹3,000-10,000 for a one-shot consult.
	+
	+	===== Story-craft: writing the RTI-led piece =====
	+
	+	- Lead with the finding, not the RTI process. "₹47 crore in unspent CSR funds at [PSU]" — not "Following an RTI by [reporter], it was revealed that…"
	+	- Cite the RTI in the second-or-third paragraph, with the date + PIO + ref no.
	+	- Reproduce the relevant excerpt as an inline quote or sidebar.
	+	- Link to the full PIO reply PDF at the bottom — readers and other journalists value sourcing.
	+	- Comment requests: include verbatim non-response or denial.
	+
	+	===== ✅ Quiz =====
	+
	+	Quiz available from your [[:courses:journalists:app\|course dashboard]].
	+
	+	===== Next =====
	+
	+	* [[:courses:journalists:start\|← Course overview]]
	+	* Next: [[:courses:journalists:final]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>course journalists module-05}}

Module 03 — Reading replies + First Appeal

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:07:45 +0000

2026/05/03 11:56	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(citizen crash course module 03, rti module 03, reading replies + first appeal)&metatag-description=(Citizen Crash Course in RTI — Module 03: Reading replies + First Appeal. By the end of this module, you can spot a defective PIO reply and file a First Appeal.)}}
	+
	+	====== Module 03 — Reading replies + First Appeal ======
	+
	+	{{ :social:auto:citizen-crash-module-03.png?direct&1200 \|Citizen Crash Course Module 03}}
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Goal: By the end of this module, you can spot a defective PIO reply and file a First Appeal.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	===== Anatomy of a good PIO reply =====
	+
	+	A compliant §7(1) reply has 4 elements:
	+	- Reference to your application — date, ref no., and your name.
	+	- Decision per question — for each of your sub-points (a), (b), (c)…, the PIO states: allow / part-allow / refuse.
	+	- Reasoning for any refusal — must cite the specific §8(1) sub-clause AND give reasons (not just "§8(1)(j) personal information" — must say WHY personal).
	+	- FAA contact + 30-day window — the senior officer to whom you can appeal.
	+
	+	===== The 7 improper-refusal patterns =====
	+
	+	If you see any of these in the PIO reply, you have grounds for First Appeal:
	+	- Bare exemption — "§8(1)(j)" without reasons → §7(8)(i) violation
	+	- Whole record refused for partial exemption — §10 severability missed
	+	- "Information not available" — without searching → bad faith
	+	- "Voluminous, file inspection only" — sometimes valid, but PIO must offer a date + place
	+	- "You should know" — never a valid response
	+	- "This is policy / under consideration" — pre-decisional notings might be exempt; bald "policy" is not
	+	- No reply at all — Day 31 = deemed refusal under §7(2)
	+
	+	===== §10 severability — your strongest weapon =====
	+
	+	If a PIO refuses part of a record under §8, they MUST disclose the rest. Refusing the whole record because part is exempt is a mandatory ground for FAA to set aside the order.
	+
	+	Example: you ask for letter sent by SDM to State Govt + names of surveyors + their phone numbers. PIO refuses the whole thing under §8(1)(j) (privacy). Wrong. Letter is disclosable, surveyor names usually disclosable, phones need §11. PIO should sever, not refuse outright.
	+
	+	===== How to draft a First Appeal under §19(1) =====
	+
	+	<code>
	+	To,
	+	The First Appellate Authority
	+	[Department]
	+	[Same address as PIO]
	+
	+	Subject: First Appeal under Section 19(1) of the RTI Act, 2005
	+
	+	Sir/Madam,
	+
	+	1. I, [Your name], a citizen of India, filed an RTI application on [date] (Ref: [your ref no.]).
	+
	+	2. The PIO's reply dated [PIO reply date] is challenged on the following grounds:
	+
	+	(a) The PIO refused under §8(1)(__) without recording reasons — violation of §7(8)(i).
	+	(b) The PIO did not apply §10 severability when refusing — the non-exempt parts must be disclosed.
	+	(c) The PIO failed to reply by Day 30 (§7(1) deadline expired) — deemed refusal under §7(2).
	+	[pick whichever apply]
	+
	+	3. I therefore request that the FAA:
	+	(a) Set aside the PIO order;
	+	(b) Direct the PIO to provide the requested information within a stated time;
	+	(c) Consider penalty under §20 against the PIO for unjustified delay/refusal.
	+
	+	Date: [DD-MM-YYYY] Signature: ________
	+	Place: [City] Name + address + phone
	+
	+	Enclosures: 1) Original RTI application 2) PIO reply 3) Speed Post AD card
	+	</code>
	+
	+	No additional fee for First Appeal (some states charge ₹10). File within 30 days of PIO order.
	+
	+	===== When to escalate to Second Appeal =====
	+
	+	If the FAA also fails or dismisses, file Second Appeal under §19(3) within 90 days to:
	+	* CIC (Central Information Commission) — for Central public authorities. cic.gov.in.
	+	* State SIC — for state public authorities. See [[:state-rti-portals-directory\|state portals page]] for SIC contact.
	+
	+	Second Appeal can also include a §20 penalty motion against the PIO and §19(8)(b) compensation claim.
	+
	+	Use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]] for §19(1); for Second Appeal templates, see the [[:cpd:module-10\|CPD Module 10]].
	+
	+	===== ✅ Quiz =====
	+
	+	10 questions, 70% to pass. Take it from your [[:courses:citizen-crash:app\|course dashboard]].
	+
	+	===== Next =====
	+
	+	* [[:courses:citizen-crash:start\|← Course overview]]
	+	* Next module: Final exam — open from your [[:courses:citizen-crash:app\|dashboard]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>course citizen-crash rti module-03}}

Module 02 — §4 suo-motu disclosure compliance audit

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:07:45 +0000

2026/05/03 11:56	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(activists module 02, §4 suo-motu disclosure compliance audit)&metatag-description=(RTI for Activists & NGOs — Module 02: §4 suo-motu disclosure compliance audit. Use §4 to expose what authorities should be publishing but arent.)}}
	+
	+	====== Module 02 — §4 suo-motu disclosure compliance audit ======
	+
	+	{{ :social:auto:activists-module-02.png?direct&1200 \|RTI for Activists & NGOs Module 02}}
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Goal: Use §4 to expose what authorities should be publishing but aren't.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	===== What §4(1)(b) requires =====
	+
	+	17 categories every public authority MUST publish suo motu (without an RTI request):
	+	- (i) particulars of organisation
	+	- (ii) powers + duties of officers + employees
	+	- (iii) decision-making procedure
	+	- (iv) norms for discharge of functions
	+	- (v) rules + regulations + manuals
	+	- (vi) categories of documents held
	+	- (vii) particulars of consultative bodies
	+	- (viii) directories of officers
	+	- (ix) salary scales
	+	- (x) budget
	+	- (xi) subsidy programmes
	+	- (xii) beneficiary lists [killer one]
	+	- (xiii) concessions, permits granted
	+	- (xiv) electronic records held
	+	- (xv) facilities for citizen info
	+	- (xvi) PIO names
	+	- (xvii) any other
	+
	+	===== §4(1)(b)(xii) — the beneficiary list =====
	+
	+	Every public authority must publish lists of beneficiaries of programmes it administers. Almost no authority complies. That non-compliance is itself the story.
	+
	+	Campaign template:
	+	- File 1-question RTI: "Provide the §4(1)(b)(xii) beneficiary list for [scheme] for FY [year], as required by the RTI Act."
	+	- PIO can't refuse — it's a mandatory disclosure.
	+	- PIO either provides (publishable) or refuses (which is itself a §20 penalty motion).
	+
	+	===== Compliance audit framework =====
	+
	+	Build a §4 compliance scorecard for any authority:
	+	- Visit the authority's website.
	+	- For each of the 17 §4(1)(b) categories, mark: published / partial / missing / outdated.
	+	- Score out of 17.
	+	- Cross-link RTI for what's missing.
	+
	+	NGO Centre for Civil Society + Transparent Chennai have done this for ULBs — typical score is 6-8/17.
	+
	+	===== CIC complaints under §18 =====
	+
	+	Distinct from §19 appeals — §18 is a complaint to the CIC/SIC about systemic non-compliance with §4 (or §6, §7). No fee. No 30-day limit.
	+
	+	Use §18 when:
	+	- Authority repeatedly fails to publish §4 disclosures
	+	- PIO is unidentifiable
	+	- There's no decision to appeal (because there's no acknowledged application)
	+
	+	§18 can result in CIC penalty under §20 against the authority's chief.
	+
	+	===== Public-interest petition follow-up =====
	+
	+	After CIC issues directions on §4 non-compliance, file a PIL in the relevant HC if compliance still doesn't follow. Major precedent: DAV College Trust v. Director of Public Instructions — schools must publish under §4 even though they're aided NGOs.
	+
	+	===== ✅ Quiz =====
	+
	+	Quiz available from your [[:courses:activists:app\|course dashboard]].
	+
	+	===== Next =====
	+
	+	* [[:courses:activists:start\|← Course overview]]
	+	* Next: [[:courses:activists:final]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>course activists module-02}}

Module 02 — Drafting RTIs that survive PIO refusal

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 20:07:45 +0000

2026/05/03 11:56	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(journalists module 02, drafting rtis that survive pio refusal)&metatag-description=(RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course — Module 02: Drafting RTIs that survive PIO refusal. Write applications a PIO cant legally refuse.)}}
	+
	+	====== Module 02 — Drafting RTIs that survive PIO refusal ======
	+
	+	{{ :social:auto:journalists-module-02.png?direct&1200 \|RTI for Journalists — Investigative Filing Course Module 02}}
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Goal: Write applications a PIO can't legally refuse.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	===== Frame for disclosability =====
	+
	+	- Ask for records that exist: invoices, orders, file notings (post-decision), minutes, lists.
	+	- Avoid asking why decisions were taken — ask for reasons recorded in the file.
	+	- Avoid named third-party data unless the public-interest case is iron-clad (§8(1)(j) vs §8(2)).
	+	- For §8(1)(d) commercial-confidence: ask for post-award records — they're disclosable per consistent HC rulings.
	+
	+	===== 5 patterns that always work =====
	+
	+	- "Year-wise" — "Year-wise expenditure on X for FY 2020-21 to FY 2025-26" — easier for PIO to retrieve, harder to refuse.
	+	- "List of" — "List of contractors awarded works above ₹50L in FY 2024-25" — pure record disclosure.
	+	- "Copies of" — "Copies of all letters sent by X office to Y office between [dates]" — discrete files, easy to sever.
	+	- "Statistics on" — "Number of complaints received and resolved on issue X in FY 2024-25" — aggregate data, no privacy issue.
	+	- "Reasons recorded for" — "Reasons recorded in the file for [decision X]" — specific, file-bound.
	+
	+	===== Anticipate §8 objections =====
	+
	+	For each sub-question, write a 1-line counter-argument in the application itself, citing case law:
	+
	+	- Anticipate §8(1)(d): "//The information sought is post-decisional and the tender process is concluded; §8(1)(d) does not apply per Bombay HC in [case].//"
	+	- Anticipate §8(1)(e): "//The records are held in the course of statutory duty, not in fiduciary capacity; §8(1)(e) does not apply per SC in Union of India v. Patel (March 2026).//"
	+	- Anticipate §8(1)(j): "//The information is about public activity of public servants; §8(1)(j) does not apply per Karnataka HC 9-Feb-2026.//"
	+
	+	This pre-empts the standard refusal — PIOs hate having their boilerplate exemption-claim already torn apart in the application.
	+
	+	===== Word-budget the application =====
	+
	+	PIOs glaze over after 2 pages. Keep applications tight:
	+	- Header (5 lines)
	+	- 1-line intro
	+	- 4-7 numbered sub-questions, each 1-2 lines
	+	- Fee declaration (1 line)
	+	- Footer (signature + ID + phone)
	+
	+	A 1-page application gets answered. A 5-page application gets returned for 'simplification' under §7(9).
	+
	+	===== When in doubt, file two =====
	+
	+	Two narrow, focused RTIs > one broad. PIOs can §7(9) reject "voluminous" — but cannot reject "specific". Split a tender RTI into:
	+	- RTI A: technical bid document + evaluation matrix
	+	- RTI B: financial bid documents + comparative chart
	+
	+	===== ✅ Quiz =====
	+
	+	Quiz available from your [[:courses:journalists:app\|course dashboard]].
	+
	+	===== Next =====
	+
	+	* [[:courses:journalists:start\|← Course overview]]
	+	* Next: [[:courses:journalists:final]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>course journalists module-02}}

Module 02 — Filing the Lokayukta complaint

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 08:32:40 +0000

2026/05/03 11:56	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(lokayukta module 02, filing the lokayukta complaint)&metatag-description=(Lokayukta Procedure for Citizens — Module 02: Filing the Lokayukta complaint. Write a complaint that gets registered (not returned).)}}
	+
	+	====== Module 02 — Filing the Lokayukta complaint ======
	+
	+	{{ :social:auto:lokayukta-module-02.png?direct&1200 \|Lokayukta Procedure for Citizens Module 02}}
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Goal: Write a complaint that gets registered (not returned).
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Lokayukta Procedure for Citizens — Module 02: Filing the Lokayukta complaint. Write a complaint that gets registered (not returned).
	+
	+	===== Format =====
	+
	+	<code>
	+	To,
	+	The Lokayukta
	+	[State Name]
	+	[Address]
	+
	+	Subject: Complaint under Section [X] of the [State] Lokayukta Act, [year]
	+
	+	Sir/Madam,
	+
	+	I, [Your name], [age], a citizen of India, residing at [Address], beg to submit this complaint against [Officer name], [designation], [department] for the following acts of misconduct / maladministration / abuse of office:
	+
	+	1. The complainant
	+	[Brief about you, capacity in which you complain — affected party / activist]
	+
	+	2. The respondent
	+	[Officer + designation + department + posting]
	+
	+	3. Acts complained of
	+	[3-7 numbered factual paragraphs, each with date, evidence reference]
	+
	+	4. Documents relied upon (Annexures A to Z)
	+	A. [RTI reply dated DD-MM-YYYY from PIO of XYZ dept, ref no. ___]
	+	B. [Order dated DD-MM-YYYY by respondent, source]
	+	C. [Photograph / video / inspection report]
	+	...
	+
	+	5. Prior departmental redressal
	+	[If any. State "none" if not required by your state's Lokayukta Act.]
	+
	+	6. Reliefs sought
	+	(a) Investigation into the matter
	+	(b) Recommendation for disciplinary action / prosecution
	+	(c) Recovery of any misappropriated amount
	+	(d) Such other order as the Lokayukta deems fit
	+
	+	7. Affidavit
	+	[Required in most states — get notarised affidavit attesting to truth of complaint]
	+
	+	Date: [DD-MM-YYYY] Signature: ________
	+	Place: [City] Name: [Your name]
	+	Phone + email
	+	</code>
	+
	+	===== What to include in the affidavit =====
	+
	+	Most state Lokayukta Acts require a notarised affidavit. Standard wording:
	+
	+	"I, [Your name], son/daughter of [Father's name], aged [X] years, resident of [Address], do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as under:
	+
	+	1. That I am the complainant in the above-referenced matter.
	+	2. That the contents of the complaint at paragraphs 1 to [N] are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
	+	3. That the documents annexed as A to Z are true copies of originals in my possession or accessed from public sources.
	+	4. That nothing material has been suppressed.
	+
	+	Deponent.
	+
	+	Verified at [Place] on [Date] that the contents of paragraphs 1 to 4 above are true to my knowledge."
	+
	+	===== Filing logistics =====
	+
	+	- Original + 3 copies (varies by state)
	+	- Affidavit notarised + attached
	+	- All annexures attested
	+	- Submit at Lokayukta office personally OR by Speed Post AD
	+	- Get the diary / inward number
	+	- Some states have online filing — check current status
	+
	+	No fee in most states. Karnataka charges nominal ₹50.
	+
	+	===== Preliminary scrutiny =====
	+
	+	Within 2-4 weeks, the Lokayukta's office will:
	+	- Verify jurisdiction
	+	- Check completeness
	+	- Assign to a Member / Investigator
	+	- Either: register as a formal complaint, OR return for completion, OR dismiss as outside jurisdiction
	+
	+	If returned for completion: 30-day window to fix + resubmit. Don't miss it.
	+
	+	===== Confidentiality =====
	+
	+	Most state Lokayukta Acts protect complainant identity from the public servant during investigation. Don't share the complaint publicly until investigation is over (this can be used by the respondent to allege malicious complaint).
	+
	+	Exception: if you're filing as part of a public-interest campaign and need to publicise — get legal advice first.
	+
	+	===== ✅ Quiz =====
	+
	+	Quiz available from your [[:courses:lokayukta:app\|course dashboard]].
	+
	+	===== Next =====
	+
	+	* [[:courses:lokayukta:start\|← Course overview]]
	+	* Next: [[:courses:lokayukta:final]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 24 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>course lokayukta module-02}}