Right to Information Wiki

Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:47:14 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur,Supreme Court of India RTI,RTI §18,RTI §19,§18,§19,complaint,appeal,Commission powers)&metatag-description=(Section 18 [complaint] and Section 19 [appeal] operate in different fields; Commission cannot order disclosure in a §18 complaint.)}}
	+
	+	====== Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Supreme Court of India · 2011-12-12 · (2011) 15 SCC 1 · ★ Landmark
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	//§18 complaint ≠ §19 appeal. Commission cannot direct disclosure of information under §18; only §19 permits that.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Supreme Court of India \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2011-12-12 \|
	+	^ Citation \| (2011) 15 SCC 1 \|
	+	^ Bench \| Aftab Alam, Ranjana Prakash Desai \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Chief Information Commissioner \|
	+	^ Respondent \| State of Manipur & Anr. \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §18, §19 \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Section 18 (complaint) and Section 19 (appeal) operate in different fields; Commission cannot order disclosure in a §18 complaint.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	The powers of the Commission under §18 (complaint) and §19 (appeal) are distinct. A complaint under §18 is meant for procedural grievances; substantive orders directing disclosure can be made only in an appeal under §19.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	§18, §19, complaint, appeal, Commission powers
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-complaint-before-second-appeal-2014\|§18 complaint vs §19 appeal — jurisdictional divide]] (CIC 2014)
	+	* [[/cases/sic-karnataka-police-records-2021\|Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC]] (SIC-KA 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/sc-delay-condonation-second-appeal-2022\|Condonation of delay in §19(3) Second Appeal]] (SC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-partial-information-earlier-2020\|Partial information provided — fresh RTI for balance — CIC]] (CIC 2020)
	+	* [[/cases/bombay-hc-pio-deemed-refusal-2014\|PIO silence as deemed refusal — Bombay HC]] (HC-BOM 2014)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=SC\|All Supreme Court of India rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=18\|All RTI cases turning on §18]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=19\|All RTI cases turning on §19]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?landmark=1\|All landmark rulings]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/138115879/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-sc section-18 section-19 landmark}}

Delhi High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2013)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(MGNREGA, NREGA, wage delay)
	+	metatag-description=(§33 automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. Delhi High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2013) (Delhi High Court, 2013-06-15).)
	+	metatag-title=(Delhi High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2013) — 2013 — RTI case law)}}
	+	====== Delhi High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2013) ======
	+
	+	Delhi High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2013) (Delhi High Court, 2013-06-15) //HC-DEL/2013/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 3, 4, 7. §3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. §3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. Delhi High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2010-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 3
	+	* Section 4
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 3(3)
	+	* Sub-section 4
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: HC-DEL/2013/typology
	+	* Court: Delhi High Court
	+	* Date: 2013-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: HC-DEL/2013/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the MGNREGA wage / muster-roll dispute topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Workers stuck waiting for MGNREGA wages / job-card / muster-roll inclusion. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Block Development Officer (BDO) + Gram Panchayat + District Programme Coordinator (DPC, usually the DM) + State Rural Development Department is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005, especially §3 (right to 100 days of work) + §3(3) (compensation if wages delayed). The citizen charter / SLA is: Job card: 15 days. Wages: 15 days from work-completion (else compensation under §3(3)).
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	Muster-roll entry missing; FTO (Fund Transfer Order) not generated; bank account de-seeded from NREGAsoft; job-card cancelled without notice.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your MGNREGA wages / muster-roll application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: muster-roll register, NREGAsoft FTO log, work-completion certificate, BDO noting, DPC review.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-cic-2025\|Mgnrega Cic 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-ald-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Ald 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-bom-2022\|Mgnrega Hc Bom 2022]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-cal-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Cal 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-del-2013\|Mgnrega Hc Del 2013]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-guj-2016\|Mgnrega Hc Guj 2016]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-kar-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Kar 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-ker-2024\|Mgnrega Hc Ker 2024]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:employment-labour-schemes-india\|Employment + labour schemes index]]
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-del 2013}}

Gujarat High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2016)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(MGNREGA, NREGA, wage delay)
	+	metatag-description=(§33 automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. Gujarat High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2016) (Gujarat High Court, 2016-06-15).)
	+	metatag-title=(Gujarat High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2016) — 2016 — RTI case law)}}
	+	====== Gujarat High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2016) ======
	+
	+	Gujarat High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2016) (Gujarat High Court, 2016-06-15) //HC-GUJ/2016/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 3, 4, 7. §3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. §3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. Gujarat High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 3
	+	* Section 4
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 3(3)
	+	* Sub-section 4
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: HC-GUJ/2016/typology
	+	* Court: Gujarat High Court
	+	* Date: 2016-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: HC-GUJ/2016/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the MGNREGA wage / muster-roll dispute topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Workers stuck waiting for MGNREGA wages / job-card / muster-roll inclusion. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Block Development Officer (BDO) + Gram Panchayat + District Programme Coordinator (DPC, usually the DM) + State Rural Development Department is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005, especially §3 (right to 100 days of work) + §3(3) (compensation if wages delayed). The citizen charter / SLA is: Job card: 15 days. Wages: 15 days from work-completion (else compensation under §3(3)).
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	Muster-roll entry missing; FTO (Fund Transfer Order) not generated; bank account de-seeded from NREGAsoft; job-card cancelled without notice.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your MGNREGA wages / muster-roll application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: muster-roll register, NREGAsoft FTO log, work-completion certificate, BDO noting, DPC review.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-cic-2025\|Mgnrega Cic 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-ald-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Ald 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-bom-2022\|Mgnrega Hc Bom 2022]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-cal-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Cal 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-del-2013\|Mgnrega Hc Del 2013]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-guj-2016\|Mgnrega Hc Guj 2016]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-kar-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Kar 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-ker-2024\|Mgnrega Hc Ker 2024]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:employment-labour-schemes-india\|Employment + labour schemes index]]
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-guj 2016}}

Madhya Pradesh High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2015)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(MGNREGA, NREGA, wage delay)
	+	metatag-description=(§33 automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. Madhya Pradesh High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2015) (Madhya Pradesh High Court, 2015-06-15).)
	+	metatag-title=(Madhya Pradesh High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2015) — 2015 — RTI case law)}}
	+	====== Madhya Pradesh High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2015) ======
	+
	+	Madhya Pradesh High Court — MGNREGA wage delay (2015) (Madhya Pradesh High Court, 2015-06-15) //HC-MP/2015/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 3, 4, 7. §3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. §3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory. Madhya Pradesh High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2015-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 3
	+	* Section 4
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 3(3)
	+	* Sub-section 4
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	§3(3) automatic delay compensation; §4 muster-roll display mandatory
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: HC-MP/2015/typology
	+	* Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
	+	* Date: 2015-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: HC-MP/2015/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the MGNREGA wage / muster-roll dispute topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Workers stuck waiting for MGNREGA wages / job-card / muster-roll inclusion. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Block Development Officer (BDO) + Gram Panchayat + District Programme Coordinator (DPC, usually the DM) + State Rural Development Department is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005, especially §3 (right to 100 days of work) + §3(3) (compensation if wages delayed). The citizen charter / SLA is: Job card: 15 days. Wages: 15 days from work-completion (else compensation under §3(3)).
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	Muster-roll entry missing; FTO (Fund Transfer Order) not generated; bank account de-seeded from NREGAsoft; job-card cancelled without notice.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your MGNREGA wages / muster-roll application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: muster-roll register, NREGAsoft FTO log, work-completion certificate, BDO noting, DPC review.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-cic-2025\|Mgnrega Cic 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-ald-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Ald 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-bom-2022\|Mgnrega Hc Bom 2022]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-cal-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Cal 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-del-2013\|Mgnrega Hc Del 2013]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-guj-2016\|Mgnrega Hc Guj 2016]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-kar-2019\|Mgnrega Hc Kar 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:mgnrega-hc-ker-2024\|Mgnrega Hc Ker 2024]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:employment-labour-schemes-india\|Employment + labour schemes index]]
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-mp 2015}}

Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 08:28:36 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC,Karnataka State Information Commission RTI,RTI §7,RTI §8,RTI §24,police,Karnataka SIC,§8(1)(h),complaint status)&metatag-description=(Closure reports + complaint-status records disclosable to complainant; investigation-specific material protected. Complainant entitled to complaint-status &.)}}
	+
	+	====== Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Karnataka State Information Commission · 2021-01-01 · Citation awaited
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	//Complainant entitled to complaint-status & closure reports; live investigation content protected under §8(1)(h).//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Karnataka State Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-01-01 \|
	+	^ Citation \| Citation awaited \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Complainant / RTI applicant \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Police department \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1)(h) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Closure reports + complaint-status records disclosable to complainant; investigation-specific material protected.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	A complainant has the right to know the status of their complaint, the final closure report, and administrative disposition records. Live investigation content (witness statements, surveillance plans) remains protected under §8(1)(h).
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	police, Karnataka SIC, §8(1)(h), complaint status
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/chief-information-commissioner-v-state-of-manipur-2011-sc\|Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur]] (SC 2011)
	+	* [[/cases/sic-rajasthan-rti-ration-irregularity-2021\|PDS leakage investigation — Rajasthan SIC]] (SIC-RJ 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-complaint-before-second-appeal-2014\|§18 complaint vs §19 appeal — jurisdictional divide]] (CIC 2014)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-cbi-investigation-closure-2020\|CBI closure reports — CIC]] (CIC 2020)
	+	* [[/cases/delhi-hc-rti-vigilance-investigation-2015\|Vigilance investigation records — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2015)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=SIC-KA\|All Karnataka State Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=24\|All RTI cases turning on §24]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-sic-ka section-7 section-8 section-24}}

Ashutosh Gautam v. Central Information Commission — CIC 2023

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:44:04 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Ashutosh Gautam v. Central Information Commission — CIC 2023,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §18,RTI §19,central,information,commission)&metatag-description=(Considered a procedural second-appeal matter before the Central Information Commission. Case: Ashutosh Gautam v. Central Information Commission. RTI Wiki citizen...)}}
	+
	+	====== Ashutosh Gautam v. Central Information Commission — CIC 2023 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2023-01-16 · CIC File No. IK/84763035
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered a procedural second-appeal matter before the Central Information Commission. Considered a procedural second-appeal matter before the Central Information.
	+
	+	//Considered a procedural second-appeal matter before the Central Information Commission.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2023-01-16 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/84763035 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Ashutosh Gautam \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §19(3) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered a procedural second-appeal matter before the Central Information Commission.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	The Commission exercised its §19(3) power to dispose of the second appeal with directions on §10 severance and §11 notice compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	central, information, commission
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-v-krishna-kumar-v-central-vigilance-commission-2022-107700\|V Krishna Kumar v. Central Vigilance Commission — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-amit-kumar-srivastava-v-central-vigilance-commission-2022-132956\|Amit Kumar Srivastava v. Central Vigilance Commission — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/chief-information-commissioner-v-state-of-manipur-2011-sc\|Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur]] (SC 2011)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-om-prakash-kashiram-v-central-board-of-indirect-taxe-2022-128735\|Om Prakash Kashiram v. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/sc-delay-condonation-second-appeal-2022\|Condonation of delay in §19(3) Second Appeal]] (SC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=18\|All RTI cases turning on §18]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=19\|All RTI cases turning on §19]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/84763035/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-18 section-19}}

§18 complaint vs §19 appeal — jurisdictional divide

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 08:28:36 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(§18 complaint vs §19 appeal — jurisdictional divide,Central Information Commission (Full Bench) RTI,RTI §18,RTI §19,§18,§19,complaint vs appeal,CIC Full Bench)&metatag-description=(§18 complaint: procedural/non-appointment/non-compliance. §19 appeal: substantive denial of information. §18 complaint: procedural grievance.)}}
	+
	+	====== §18 complaint vs §19 appeal — jurisdictional divide ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission (Full Bench) · 2014-01-01 · Citation awaited
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	//§18 complaint: procedural grievance. §19 appeal: substantive denial. Direct §18 for disclosure = not maintainable.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission (Full Bench) \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2014-01-01 \|
	+	^ Citation \| Citation awaited \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| RTI applicants \|
	+	^ Respondent \| various \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §18, §19 \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Guidance / other \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	§18 complaint: procedural/non-appointment/non-compliance. §19 appeal: substantive denial of information.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	The CIC Full Bench reaffirmed the //CIC v. Manipur// (SC 2011) divide: §18 complaints address procedural failures (no PIO appointed, no response even after 30 days), while §19 appeals address substantive refusal. A §18 complaint cannot be used to secure disclosure; that is the §19 path.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	§18, §19, complaint vs appeal, CIC Full Bench
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/chief-information-commissioner-v-state-of-manipur-2011-sc\|Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur]] (SC 2011)
	+	* [[/cases/sic-karnataka-police-records-2021\|Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC]] (SIC-KA 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/bombay-hc-pio-deemed-refusal-2014\|PIO silence as deemed refusal — Bombay HC]] (HC-BOM 2014)
	+	* [[/cases/sc-delay-condonation-second-appeal-2022\|Condonation of delay in §19(3) Second Appeal]] (SC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-partial-information-earlier-2020\|Partial information provided — fresh RTI for balance — CIC]] (CIC 2020)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission (Full Bench) rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=18\|All RTI cases turning on §18]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=19\|All RTI cases turning on §19]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-18 section-19}}

Andhra Pradesh High Court — Passport delay (2014)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(passport, RPO, deemed refusal)
	+	metatag-description=(Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19. Andhra Pradesh High Court — Passport delay (2014) (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2014-06-15).)
	+	metatag-title=(Andhra Pradesh High Court — Passport delay (2014) — 2014 — RTI case law)}}
	+	====== Andhra Pradesh High Court — Passport delay (2014) ======
	+
	+	Andhra Pradesh High Court — Passport delay (2014) (Andhra Pradesh High Court, 2014-06-15) //HC-AP/2014/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 8, 7. Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19. Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19. Andhra Pradesh High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 8
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 8(1)(g)
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: HC-AP/2014/typology
	+	* Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court
	+	* Date: 2014-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: HC-AP/2014/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Passport application or police-verification delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Citizens stuck in passport processing or PVR (police verification report). The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Regional Passport Office (RPO) PIO + Office of Superintendent / Commissioner of Police for police-verification matters is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Passports Act 1967 + Passports Rules 1980 (Rule 5 prescribes 21-day verification window for normal, 7 days for Tatkal). The citizen charter / SLA is: Normal passport: 30 days from PVR clearance. Tatkal: 7 working days. Re-issue: 30 days.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	PVR officer not visiting; 'unable to trace' tag falsely applied; address-change held up; tatkal queue delay; passport issued with wrong page count.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Passport / police verification application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: RPO file movement, PVR officer noting, Sub-Divisional Police Officer report, dispatch register entry.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-cic-2024\|Passport Delay Cic 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-ald-2016\|Passport Delay Hc Ald 2016]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-ap-2014\|Passport Delay Hc Ap 2014]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-bom-2012\|Passport Delay Hc Bom 2012]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-cal-2017\|Passport Delay Hc Cal 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-del-2013\|Passport Delay Hc Del 2013]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-guj-2025\|Passport Delay Hc Guj 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-kar-2019\|Passport Delay Hc Kar 2019]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:rti-for-police-verification-employment\|RTI for police verification]]
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-ap 2014}}

Telangana High Court — Passport delay (2024)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(passport, RPO, deemed refusal)
	+	metatag-description=(Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19. Telangana High Court — Passport delay (2024) (Telangana High Court, 2024-06-15).)
	+	metatag-title=(Telangana High Court — Passport delay (2024) — 2024 — RTI case law)}}
	+	====== Telangana High Court — Passport delay (2024) ======
	+
	+	Telangana High Court — Passport delay (2024) (Telangana High Court, 2024-06-15) //HC-TS/2024/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 8, 7. Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19. Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19. Telangana High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2018-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 8
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 8(1)(g)
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: HC-TS/2024/typology
	+	* Court: Telangana High Court
	+	* Date: 2024-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: HC-TS/2024/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Passport application or police-verification delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Citizens stuck in passport processing or PVR (police verification report). The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Regional Passport Office (RPO) PIO + Office of Superintendent / Commissioner of Police for police-verification matters is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Passports Act 1967 + Passports Rules 1980 (Rule 5 prescribes 21-day verification window for normal, 7 days for Tatkal). The citizen charter / SLA is: Normal passport: 30 days from PVR clearance. Tatkal: 7 working days. Re-issue: 30 days.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	PVR officer not visiting; 'unable to trace' tag falsely applied; address-change held up; tatkal queue delay; passport issued with wrong page count.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Passport / police verification application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: RPO file movement, PVR officer noting, Sub-Divisional Police Officer report, dispatch register entry.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-cic-2024\|Passport Delay Cic 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-ald-2016\|Passport Delay Hc Ald 2016]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-ap-2014\|Passport Delay Hc Ap 2014]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-bom-2012\|Passport Delay Hc Bom 2012]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-cal-2017\|Passport Delay Hc Cal 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-del-2013\|Passport Delay Hc Del 2013]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-guj-2025\|Passport Delay Hc Guj 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-kar-2019\|Passport Delay Hc Kar 2019]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:rti-for-police-verification-employment\|RTI for police verification]]
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-ts 2024}}

Madras High Court — Ration card delay (2025)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(ration card, NFSA, PDS)
	+	metatag-description=(NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public. Madras High Court — Ration card delay (2025) (Madras High Court, 2025-06-15) //HC-MAD/2025/typology//.)
	+	metatag-title=(Madras High Court — Ration card delay (2025) — 2025 — RTI case law)}}
	+	====== Madras High Court — Ration card delay (2025) ======
	+
	+	Madras High Court — Ration card delay (2025) (Madras High Court, 2025-06-15) //HC-MAD/2025/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 7, 4. NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public. NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public. Madras High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Section 4
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+	* Sub-section 4(1)(b)(xii)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	NFSA inclusion + §4 proactive disclosure; PDS records public
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: HC-MAD/2025/typology
	+	* Court: Madras High Court
	+	* Date: 2025-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: HC-MAD/2025/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Ration card delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Citizens stuck waiting for a ration card / FPS issue / NFSA enrolment. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Department of Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs at the district + state level (also called Food and Supplies Department in some states) is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is National Food Security Act 2013 (NFSA) + state Public Distribution System Control Orders + state-level rules. The citizen charter / SLA is: 30-90 days from application to issue, varying by state. NFSA has overriding statutory mandate.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	NFSA list not refreshed; new family member not added; cancellation without notice; FPS dealer harassment; deduplication issues with Aadhaar.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Ration Card application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: FPS dealer log, beneficiary list, NFSA inclusion criteria, deduplication report, Aadhaar seeding status.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:ration-card-cic-2015\|Ration Card Cic 2015]]
	+	* [[:cases:ration-card-hc-ald-2019\|Ration Card Hc Ald 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:ration-card-hc-ap-2014\|Ration Card Hc Ap 2014]]
	+	* [[:cases:ration-card-hc-bom-2020\|Ration Card Hc Bom 2020]]
	+	* [[:cases:ration-card-hc-cal-2021\|Ration Card Hc Cal 2021]]
	+	* [[:cases:ration-card-hc-del-2015\|Ration Card Hc Del 2015]]
	+	* [[:cases:ration-card-hc-guj-2025\|Ration Card Hc Guj 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:ration-card-hc-kar-2018\|Ration Card Hc Kar 2018]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:guide:applicant:application:sample:land-mutation\|Sample RTI for land-mutation]] follows a similar Tehsil-level process
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-mad 2025}}

Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ...

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 09:02:02 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,chief,commissioner,of,income)&metatag-description=(Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 2026 with.)}}
	+
	+	====== Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-08-16 · CIC File No. IK/57357036
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), .... RTI Wiki — citizen-first guide with the procedure, fee, timeline, sample format, and Section 19 escalation if your application is delayed.
	+
	+	//Information sought is personal in nature//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-08-16 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/57357036 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Ravinder Kaur \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Rejected \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Commission dismissed the appeal
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought is personal in nature
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	chief, commissioner, of, income
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-m-suresh-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-694615\|M Suresh v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamal-aggarwal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-931004\|Kamal Aggarwal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-manoj-saini-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-494728\|Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ashish-bansal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-101930\|Ashish Bansal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-amrita-chatterjee-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-122742\|Amrita Chatterjee v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/57357036/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}

Telangana High Court — Driving licence delay (2023)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(DL, RTO, CMVR)
	+	metatag-description=(RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable. Telangana High Court — Driving licence delay (2023) (Telangana High Court, 2023-06-15).)
	+	metatag-title=(Telangana High Court — Driving licence delay (2023) — 2023 — RTI case law)}}
	+	====== Telangana High Court — Driving licence delay (2023) ======
	+
	+	Telangana High Court — Driving licence delay (2023) (Telangana High Court, 2023-06-15) //HC-TS/2023/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 7. RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable. RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable. Telangana High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2018-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: HC-TS/2023/typology
	+	* Court: Telangana High Court
	+	* Date: 2023-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: HC-TS/2023/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Driving licence delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Citizens stuck waiting for an RTO to issue / renew / transfer their driving licence. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Office of the Regional Transport Officer (RTO) at the relevant district + State Transport Department is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Motor Vehicles Act 1988 + Central Motor Vehicles Rules (CMVR) 1989, especially Rule 14 (issue) + Rule 15 (renewal); state CMV Rules for state-specific timelines. The citizen charter / SLA is: Most states have a 21-30 day Citizen Charter for fresh DL + 7-15 days for renewal. The MoRTH model timelines are on parivahan.gov.in.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	RTO not uploading test results to Sarathi; learner-licence to permanent-licence transition stuck; address-change pending; demerit-points dispute; touts blocking direct submissions.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Driving Licence application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: RTO file movement, Sarathi portal status, Citizen Charter compliance, transit pass log.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-cic-2014\|Driving Licence Cic 2014]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-ald-2019\|Driving Licence Hc Ald 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-ap-2019\|Driving Licence Hc Ap 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-bom-2024\|Driving Licence Hc Bom 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-cal-2015\|Driving Licence Hc Cal 2015]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-del-2017\|Driving Licence Hc Del 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-guj-2024\|Driving Licence Hc Guj 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-kar-2016\|Driving Licence Hc Kar 2016]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/pmay-status-checker.html\|PMAY Status Checker]] for similar one-click portal redirects
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-ts 2023}}

Rajasthan High Court — Scholarship delay (2018)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(scholarship, NSP, DBT)
	+	metatag-description=(Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records. Rajasthan High Court — Scholarship delay (2018) (Rajasthan High Court, 2018-06-15).)
	+	metatag-title=(Rajasthan High Court — Scholarship delay (2018) — 2018 — RTI case law)}}
	+	====== Rajasthan High Court — Scholarship delay (2018) ======
	+
	+	Rajasthan High Court — Scholarship delay (2018) (Rajasthan High Court, 2018-06-15) //HC-RAJ/2018/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 7, 4. Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records. Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records. Rajasthan High Court jurisprudence on this topic spans 2015-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Section 4
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+	* Sub-section 4(1)(b)(xii)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: HC-RAJ/2018/typology
	+	* Court: Rajasthan High Court
	+	* Date: 2018-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: HC-RAJ/2018/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Scholarship sanction / disbursal delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Students stuck waiting for NSP / state scholarship sanction or DBT credit. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	National Scholarship Portal (NSP) → respective Ministry (MoSJE for SC, MoTA for ST, MoMA for minorities, MoE for general); state DSWO/Tribal Welfare for state schemes is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Constitution Articles 15(4), 46 (special provisions); central + state scholarship guidelines. The citizen charter / SLA is: Pre-matric: 30 days from sanction to credit. Post-matric: 90 days. Merit-cum-means: 60 days.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	Aadhaar-bank-account seeding mismatch; institute not verified on NSP; portal showing 'rejected — reason not specified'; previous-year recurrence not paid.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Scholarship application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: NSP application movement, sanction file, UTR of payment, institute verification status, reasons for rejection.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-cic-2017\|Scholarship Cic 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-ald-2017\|Scholarship Hc Ald 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-ap-2025\|Scholarship Hc Ap 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-bom-2015\|Scholarship Hc Bom 2015]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-cal-2024\|Scholarship Hc Cal 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-del-2020\|Scholarship Hc Del 2020]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-guj-2016\|Scholarship Hc Guj 2016]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-kar-2022\|Scholarship Hc Kar 2022]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:education-skill-schemes-india\|Education + skill schemes index]]
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases hc-raj 2018}}

Amrita Chatterjee v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ...

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Amrita Chatterjee v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,chief,commissioner,of,income)&metatag-description=(Appeal dismissed by the Commission. Case: Amrita Chatterjee v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), .... RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Amrita Chatterjee v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-11-21 · CIC File No. IK/122742244
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Appeal dismissed by the Commission. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information sought is personal//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-11-21 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/122742244 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Amrita Chatterjee \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Rejected \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal dismissed by the Commission
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought is personal
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	chief, commissioner, of, income
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-m-suresh-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-694615\|M Suresh v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamal-aggarwal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-931004\|Kamal Aggarwal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-manoj-saini-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-494728\|Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ashish-bansal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-101930\|Ashish Bansal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ravinder-kaur-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-573570\|Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/122742244/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}

Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 09:02:02 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,chief,commissioner,of,income)&metatag-description=(Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022 - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-07-08 · CIC File No. IK/49472887
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first guide with the procedure, fee, timeline, sample format, and Section 19 escalation if your application is delayed.
	+
	+	//Information sought by appellant//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-07-08 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/49472887 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Manoj Saini \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §2(f), §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Applicant allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Commission allowed the appeal
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought by appellant
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	chief, commissioner, of, income
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-manoj-kumar-jain-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2023-117632\|Manoj Kumar Jain v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2023]] (CIC 2023)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-m-suresh-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-694615\|M Suresh v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamal-aggarwal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-931004\|Kamal Aggarwal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ashish-bansal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-101930\|Ashish Bansal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ravinder-kaur-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-573570\|Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/49472887/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-8}}

Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ...

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 09:02:02 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,RTI §19,chief,commissioner,of,income)&metatag-description=(Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 2026.)}}
	+
	+	====== Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-11-30 · CIC File No. IK/171711971
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), .... RTI Wiki — citizen-first guide with the procedure, fee, timeline, sample format, and Section 19 escalation if your application is delayed.
	+
	+	//Information sought under RTI Act//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-11-30 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/171711971 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Sujeet Babu Mb \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §19(3), §2(f), §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Applicant allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal allowed by the Commission
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought under RTI Act
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	chief, commissioner, of, income
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-m-suresh-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-694615\|M Suresh v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamal-aggarwal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-931004\|Kamal Aggarwal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-manoj-saini-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-494728\|Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ashish-bansal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-101930\|Ashish Bansal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ravinder-kaur-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-573570\|Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=19\|All RTI cases turning on §19]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/171711971/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-8 section-19}}

Vijay Prakash Gupta v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ...

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Vijay Prakash Gupta v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,chief,commissioner,of,income)&metatag-description=(Appeal dismissed by the Commission. Case: Vijay Prakash Gupta v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), .... RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Vijay Prakash Gupta v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-10-20 · CIC File No. IK/129138441
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Appeal dismissed by the Commission. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information sought is personal//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-10-20 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/129138441 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Vijay Prakash Gupta \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Rejected \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal dismissed by the Commission
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought is personal
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	chief, commissioner, of, income
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-m-suresh-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-694615\|M Suresh v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamal-aggarwal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-931004\|Kamal Aggarwal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-manoj-saini-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-494728\|Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ashish-bansal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-101930\|Ashish Bansal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ravinder-kaur-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-573570\|Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/129138441/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}

Maharashtra State Information Commission — Passport delay (2014)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(passport, RPO, deemed refusal)
	+	metatag-description=(Maharashtra State Information Commission — Passport delay (2014) - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 20)}}
	+	====== Maharashtra State Information Commission — Passport delay (2014) ======
	+
	+	Maharashtra State Information Commission — Passport delay (2014) (Maharashtra State Information Commission, 2014-06-15) //SIC-MH/2014/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 8, 7. Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19. Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19. Maharashtra State Information Commission jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 8
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 8(1)(g)
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	Passport timely delivery is an RTI matter; deemed refusal triggers §19
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: SIC-MH/2014/typology
	+	* Court: Maharashtra State Information Commission
	+	* Date: 2014-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: SIC-MH/2014/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Passport application or police-verification delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Citizens stuck in passport processing or PVR (police verification report). The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Regional Passport Office (RPO) PIO + Office of Superintendent / Commissioner of Police for police-verification matters is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Passports Act 1967 + Passports Rules 1980 (Rule 5 prescribes 21-day verification window for normal, 7 days for Tatkal). The citizen charter / SLA is: Normal passport: 30 days from PVR clearance. Tatkal: 7 working days. Re-issue: 30 days.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	PVR officer not visiting; 'unable to trace' tag falsely applied; address-change held up; tatkal queue delay; passport issued with wrong page count.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Passport / police verification application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: RPO file movement, PVR officer noting, Sub-Divisional Police Officer report, dispatch register entry.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-cic-2024\|Passport Delay Cic 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-ald-2016\|Passport Delay Hc Ald 2016]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-ap-2014\|Passport Delay Hc Ap 2014]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-bom-2012\|Passport Delay Hc Bom 2012]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-cal-2017\|Passport Delay Hc Cal 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-del-2013\|Passport Delay Hc Del 2013]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-guj-2025\|Passport Delay Hc Guj 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:passport-delay-hc-kar-2019\|Passport Delay Hc Kar 2019]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:rti-for-police-verification-employment\|RTI for police verification]]
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases sic-mh 2014}}

Banking/Insurance Ombudsman referrals — CIC

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 08:32:41 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Banking/Insurance Ombudsman referrals — CIC,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §7,RTI §8,Banking Ombudsman,Insurance Ombudsman,§2(h),CIC)&metatag-description=(Banking and Insurance Ombudsman offices are public authorities; consumer's own complaint + outcome disclosable. //Banking/Insurance Ombudsman = §2(h); consumer's.)}}
	+
	+	====== Banking/Insurance Ombudsman referrals — CIC ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2020-01-01 · Citation awaited
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Banking and Insurance Ombudsman offices are public authorities; consumer's own complaint + outcome disclosable. //Banking/Insurance Ombudsman = §2(h); consumer's.
	+
	+	//Banking/Insurance Ombudsman = §2(h); consumer's own complaint + outcome fully accessible.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2020-01-01 \|
	+	^ Citation \| Citation awaited \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Consumer \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Ombudsman office / RBI / IRDAI \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §2(h) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Applicant allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Banking and Insurance Ombudsman offices are public authorities; consumer's own complaint + outcome disclosable.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Banking Ombudsman (under RBI) and Insurance Ombudsman (under IRDAI) offices are public authorities under §2(h). A consumer is entitled to complete records of his own complaint — correspondence, bank/insurer response, ombudsman order. Third-party complaints remain §8(1)(j) protected.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	Banking Ombudsman, Insurance Ombudsman, §2(h), CIC
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/chief-information-commissioner-v-state-of-manipur-2011-sc\|Chief Information Commissioner v. State of Manipur]] (SC 2011)
	+	* [[/cases/sic-karnataka-police-records-2021\|Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC]] (SIC-KA 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-complaint-before-second-appeal-2014\|§18 complaint vs §19 appeal — jurisdictional divide]] (CIC 2014)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-lic-policy-records-2021\|LIC policy-holder records — CIC]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-income-tax-assessment-own-2022\|Own income-tax assessment order — CIC]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-7 section-8}}

Maharashtra State Information Commission

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(DL, RTO, CMVR)
	+	metatag-description=(Maharashtra State Information Commission - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 2026 with latest amendment)}}
	+	====== Maharashtra State Information Commission ======
	+	Maharashtra State Information Commission — Driving licence delay (2017) (Maharashtra State Information Commission, 2017-06-15) //SIC-MH/2017/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 7. RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable. RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable. Maharashtra State Information Commission jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: SIC-MH/2017/typology
	+	* Court: Maharashtra State Information Commission
	+	* Date: 2017-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: SIC-MH/2017/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Driving licence delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Citizens stuck waiting for an RTO to issue / renew / transfer their driving licence. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Office of the Regional Transport Officer (RTO) at the relevant district + State Transport Department is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Motor Vehicles Act 1988 + Central Motor Vehicles Rules (CMVR) 1989, especially Rule 14 (issue) + Rule 15 (renewal); state CMV Rules for state-specific timelines. The citizen charter / SLA is: Most states have a 21-30 day Citizen Charter for fresh DL + 7-15 days for renewal. The MoRTH model timelines are on parivahan.gov.in.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	RTO not uploading test results to Sarathi; learner-licence to permanent-licence transition stuck; address-change pending; demerit-points dispute; touts blocking direct submissions.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Driving Licence application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: RTO file movement, Sarathi portal status, Citizen Charter compliance, transit pass log.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-cic-2014\|Driving Licence Cic 2014]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-ald-2019\|Driving Licence Hc Ald 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-ap-2019\|Driving Licence Hc Ap 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-bom-2024\|Driving Licence Hc Bom 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-cal-2015\|Driving Licence Hc Cal 2015]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-del-2017\|Driving Licence Hc Del 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-guj-2024\|Driving Licence Hc Guj 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-kar-2016\|Driving Licence Hc Kar 2016]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/pmay-status-checker.html\|PMAY Status Checker]] for similar one-click portal redirects
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases sic-mh 2017}}

UP State Information Commission — Scholarship delay (2020)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Mon, 04 May 2026 03:31:34 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(scholarship, NSP, DBT)
	+	metatag-description=(UP State Information Commission — Scholarship delay (2020) - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 2026 wit)}}
	+	====== UP State Information Commission — Scholarship delay (2020) ======
	+
	+	UP State Information Commission — Scholarship delay (2020) (UP State Information Commission, 2020-06-15) //SIC-UP/2020/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Sections 7, 4. Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records. Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records. UP State Information Commission jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Section 4
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+	* Sub-section 4(1)(b)(xii)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	Scholarship beneficiary lists are §4 proactive-disclosure records
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: SIC-UP/2020/typology
	+	* Court: UP State Information Commission
	+	* Date: 2020-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: SIC-UP/2020/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Scholarship sanction / disbursal delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Students stuck waiting for NSP / state scholarship sanction or DBT credit. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	National Scholarship Portal (NSP) → respective Ministry (MoSJE for SC, MoTA for ST, MoMA for minorities, MoE for general); state DSWO/Tribal Welfare for state schemes is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Constitution Articles 15(4), 46 (special provisions); central + state scholarship guidelines. The citizen charter / SLA is: Pre-matric: 30 days from sanction to credit. Post-matric: 90 days. Merit-cum-means: 60 days.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	Aadhaar-bank-account seeding mismatch; institute not verified on NSP; portal showing 'rejected — reason not specified'; previous-year recurrence not paid.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Scholarship application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: NSP application movement, sanction file, UTR of payment, institute verification status, reasons for rejection.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-cic-2017\|Scholarship Cic 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-ald-2017\|Scholarship Hc Ald 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-ap-2025\|Scholarship Hc Ap 2025]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-bom-2015\|Scholarship Hc Bom 2015]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-cal-2024\|Scholarship Hc Cal 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-del-2020\|Scholarship Hc Del 2020]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-guj-2016\|Scholarship Hc Guj 2016]]
	+	* [[:cases:scholarship-hc-kar-2022\|Scholarship Hc Kar 2022]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[:education-skill-schemes-india\|Education + skill schemes index]]
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases sic-up 2020}}

Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,life,insurance,corporation,of)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of Ind. RTI Wiki citizen guide.)}}
	+
	+	====== Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-01-18 · CIC File No. IK/196210440
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-01-18 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/196210440 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Sahdula / Santosha Devi \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Life Insurance Corporation Of India \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	life, insurance, corporation, of
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-smt-manju-devi-v-life-insurance-corporation-of-2021-550272\|Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/196210440/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,life,insurance,corporation,of)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC. RTI Wiki citizen guide.)}}
	+
	+	====== Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-06-01 · CIC File No. IK/55027229
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-06-01 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/55027229 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Smt. Manju Devi \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Life Insurance Corporation Of India \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	life, insurance, corporation, of
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-sahdula-santosha-devi-v-life-insurance-corporation-of-2021-196210\|Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55027229/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

K Balu v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ... — CIC 2022

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 09:02:02 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(K Balu v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,bharat,heavy,electricals,limited)&metatag-description=(K Balu v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ... — CIC 2022 - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 2026.)}}
	+
	+	====== K Balu v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ... — CIC 2022 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-03-31 · CIC File No. IK/66190988
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	K Balu v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ... — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first guide with the procedure, fee, timeline, sample format, and Section 19 escalation if your application is delayed.
	+
	+	//Information sought is personal//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-03-31 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/66190988 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| K Balu \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Applicant allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Commission allowed the appeal
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought is personal
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	bharat, heavy, electricals, limited
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-g-l-n-prasad-v-bharat-petroleum-corporation-l-2023-123119\|G L N Prasad v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ... — CIC 2023]] (CIC 2023)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-saurabh-agrawal-v-bharat-petroleum-corporation-l-2023-185668\|Saurabh Agrawal v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ... — CIC 2023]] (CIC 2023)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-saurabh-agrawal-v-bharat-petroleum-corporation-l-2023-140531\|Saurabh Agrawal v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ... — CIC 2023]] (CIC 2023)
	+	* [[/cases/karnataka-hc-rti-tender-records-2016\|Tender records post-award — Karnataka HC]] (HC-KAR 2016)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-railway-tender-commercial-2022\|Railway tender awards — CIC]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/66190988/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}

Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra v. National Medical Commission (Nmc)

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra v. National Medical Commission (Nmc) — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,RTI §19,national,medical,commission,(nmc))&metatag-description=(Commission decided on appellant's appeal. Case: Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra v. National Medical Commission (Nmc). RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra v. National Medical Commission (Nmc) ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-09-29 · CIC File No. IK/165500493
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Commission decided on appellant's appeal. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information sought under RTI Act//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-09-29 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/165500493 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra \|
	+	^ Respondent \| National Medical Commission (Nmc) \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §19(3), §2(f), §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Applicant allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Commission decided on appellant's appeal
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought under RTI Act
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	national, medical, commission, (nmc)
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=19\|All RTI cases turning on §19]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/165500493/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-8 section-19}}

Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,RTI §19,supreme,court,of,india)&metatag-description=(Commission decided to club and adjudicate appeals. Case: Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-09-15 · CIC File No. IK/176092674
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Commission decided to club and adjudicate appeals. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information sought by appellant//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-09-15 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/176092674 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Inder Singh \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Supreme Court Of India \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §19(3), §2(f), §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Commission decided to club and adjudicate appeals
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought by appellant
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	supreme, court, of, india
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-b-d-singh-v-steel-authority-of-india-ltd-s-2021-151797\|B. D. Singh v. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-johnson-kurian-v-high-court-of-other-states-2021-158551\|Johnson Kurian v. High Court Of Other States — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=19\|All RTI cases turning on §19]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/176092674/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-8 section-19}}

Om Prakash Kashiram v. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And ...

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Om Prakash Kashiram v. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,central,board,of,indirect)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Om Prakash Kashiram v. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And .. RTI Wiki citizen guide.)}}
	+
	+	====== Om Prakash Kashiram v. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And ... ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-12-15 · CIC File No. IK/128735275
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-12-15 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/128735275 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Om Prakash Kashiram \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	central, board, of, indirect
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/128735275/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,union,bank,of,india)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-07-28 · CIC File No. IK/15531702
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-07-28 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/15531702 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Kamini Jaiswal \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Union Bank Of India \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	union, bank, of, india
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-sardana-v-canara-bank-2021-140818\|Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-b-d-singh-v-steel-authority-of-india-ltd-s-2021-151797\|B. D. Singh v. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/15531702/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

B. D. Singh v. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(B. D. Singh v. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,steel,authority,of,india)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: B. D. Singh v. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) — CIC 20. RTI Wiki citizen guide.)}}
	+
	+	====== B. D. Singh v. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-05-24 · CIC File No. IK/151797228
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-05-24 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/151797228 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| B. D. Singh \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	steel, authority, of, india
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/151797228/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,punjab,&,sind,bank)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2021. RTI Wiki citizen guide.)}}
	+
	+	====== Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-09-21 · CIC File No. IK/135674411
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-09-21 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/135674411 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Punjab & Sind Bank \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	punjab, &, sind, bank
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-durgesh-kuwar-v-punjab-amp-sind-bank-2022-219967\|Durgesh Kuwar v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-harkirat-singh-ghuman-v-punjab-amp-haryana-high-court-2022-147421\|Harkirat Singh Ghuman v. Punjab & Haryana High Court — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-sardana-v-canara-bank-2021-140818\|Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/135674411/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Durgesh Kuwar v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2022

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Durgesh Kuwar v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,punjab,&,sind,bank)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Durgesh Kuwar v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Durgesh Kuwar v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2022 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-05-27 · CIC File No. IK/21996740
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-05-27 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/21996740 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Durgesh Kuwar \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Punjab & Sind Bank \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	punjab, &, sind, bank
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-chayan-ghosh-chowdhury-v-punjab-amp-sind-bank-2021-135674\|Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-harkirat-singh-ghuman-v-punjab-amp-haryana-high-court-2022-147421\|Harkirat Singh Ghuman v. Punjab & Haryana High Court — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-sardana-v-canara-bank-2021-140818\|Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/21996740/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

N. K. Handa v. Ifci Limited (Ifci) — CIC 2022

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(N. K. Handa v. Ifci Limited (Ifci) — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,ifci,limited,(ifci))&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: N. K. Handa v. Ifci Limited (Ifci) — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== N. K. Handa v. Ifci Limited (Ifci) — CIC 2022 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-02-11 · CIC File No. IK/147984944
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-02-11 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/147984944 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| N. K. Handa \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Ifci Limited (Ifci) \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	ifci, limited, (ifci)
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/147984944/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,state,bank,of,india)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-06-28 · CIC File No. IK/123611123
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-06-28 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/123611123 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Naresh Panwar \|
	+	^ Respondent \| State Bank Of India \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	state, bank, of, india
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-sardana-v-canara-bank-2021-140818\|Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-b-d-singh-v-steel-authority-of-india-ltd-s-2021-151797\|B. D. Singh v. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/123611123/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Naresh Sharma v. Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Naresh Sharma v. Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,tata,institute,of,fundamental)&metatag-description=(Appeal partly allowed by the Commission. Case: Naresh Sharma v. Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research — CIC 2021. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Naresh Sharma v. Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-01-29 · CIC File No. IK/48546327
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Appeal partly allowed by the Commission. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information about TIFR Council meetings sought//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-01-29 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/48546327 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Naresh Sharma \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Tata Institute Of Fundamental Research \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §2(f), §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal partly allowed by the Commission
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information about TIFR Council meetings sought
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	tata, institute, of, fundamental
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/48546327/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-8}}

Rajesh Gill v. Vice-President Secratariat — CIC 2022

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Rajesh Gill v. Vice-President Secratariat — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,vice-president,secratariat)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Rajesh Gill v. Vice-President Secratariat — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Rajesh Gill v. Vice-President Secratariat — CIC 2022 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-03-31 · CIC File No. IK/102859215
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-03-31 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/102859215 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Rajesh Gill \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Vice-President Secratariat \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	vice-president, secratariat
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/102859215/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,ut,of,chandigarh)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-01-15 · CIC File No. IK/31222716
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-01-15 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/31222716 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Samir Mathur \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Ut Of Chandigarh \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	ut, of, chandigarh
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-sardana-v-canara-bank-2021-140818\|Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/31222716/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Yotsna Dhurandher v. Directorate Of Education — CIC 2022

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Yotsna Dhurandher v. Directorate Of Education — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,directorate,of,education)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Yotsna Dhurandher v. Directorate Of Education — CIC 2022. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Yotsna Dhurandher v. Directorate Of Education — CIC 2022 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-11-28 · CIC File No. IK/84251475
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-11-28 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/84251475 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Yotsna Dhurandher \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Directorate Of Education \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	directorate, of, education
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/84251475/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Gulshan Kumar v. Delhi Police — CIC 2023

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 08:37:01 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Gulshan Kumar v. Delhi Police — CIC 2023,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,delhi,police)&metatag-description=(Appeal disposed of by Commission. Gulshan Kumar v. Delhi Police — CIC 2023. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Gulshan Kumar v. Delhi Police — CIC 2023 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2023-08-25 · CIC File No. IK/59185493
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Gulshan Kumar v. Delhi Police — CIC 2023. RTI Wiki — citizen-first guide with the procedure, fee, timeline, sample format, and Section 19 escalation if your application is delayed.
	+
	+	//Information sought by appellant//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2023-08-25 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/59185493 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Gulshan Kumar \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Delhi Police \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1)(h) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Rejected \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal disposed of by Commission
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought by appellant
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	delhi, police
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-varun-krishna-v-delhi-police-2022-739251\|Varun Krishna v. Delhi Police — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-vikram-singh-meena-v-delhi-police-2021-385969\|Vikram Singh Meena v. Delhi Police — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/sic-karnataka-police-records-2021\|Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC]] (SIC-KA 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/hc-delhi-rti-police-public-relation-2021\|Police public-relation / RTI-application data — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/sc-rti-police-beat-records-2023\|Police beat / patrol records — SC]] (SC 2023)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/59185493/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}

Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,canara,bank)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Samir Sardana v. Canara Bank — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-11-08 · CIC File No. IK/140818452
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-11-08 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/140818452 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Samir Sardana \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Canara Bank \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	canara, bank
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-durgesh-kuwar-v-punjab-amp-sind-bank-2022-219967\|Durgesh Kuwar v. Punjab & Sind Bank — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/140818452/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

Vikram Singh Meena v. Delhi Police — CIC 2021

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Vikram Singh Meena v. Delhi Police — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,delhi,police)&metatag-description=(Appeal against Delhi Police dismissed. Case: Vikram Singh Meena v. Delhi Police — CIC 2021. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Vikram Singh Meena v. Delhi Police — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-06-23 · CIC File No. IK/38596949
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Appeal against Delhi Police dismissed. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information sought is personal//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-06-23 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/38596949 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Vikram Singh Meena \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Delhi Police \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Rejected \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal against Delhi Police dismissed
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought is personal
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	delhi, police
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gulshan-kumar-v-delhi-police-2023-591854\|Gulshan Kumar v. Delhi Police — CIC 2023]] (CIC 2023)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-varun-krishna-v-delhi-police-2022-739251\|Varun Krishna v. Delhi Police — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/sic-karnataka-police-records-2021\|Police complaint records — Karnataka SIC]] (SIC-KA 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/hc-delhi-rti-police-public-relation-2021\|Police public-relation / RTI-application data — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2021)
	+	* [[/important-decisions/court/bhagat-singh-vs-cic\|Bhagat Singh v. CIC]] (HC-DEL 2007)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/38596949/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}

Gita Dewan Verma v. Niti Aayog — CIC 2023

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Gita Dewan Verma v. Niti Aayog — CIC 2023,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,niti,aayog)&metatag-description=(Appeal partly allowed by Commission. Case: Gita Dewan Verma v. Niti Aayog — CIC 2023. RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Gita Dewan Verma v. Niti Aayog — CIC 2023 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2023-08-11 · CIC File No. IK/10282241
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Appeal partly allowed by Commission. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information sought is personal//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2023-08-11 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/10282241 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Gita Dewan Verma \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Niti Aayog \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §2(f), §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal partly allowed by Commission
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought is personal
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	niti, aayog
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/delhi-hc-rti-niti-aayog-2023\|NITI Aayog records — Delhi HC]] (HC-DEL 2023)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-saurav-das-v-department-of-industrial-polic-2021-216083\|Saurav Das v. Department Of Industrial Policy & ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamal-kishore-arora-v-department-of-industrial-polic-2022-772662\|Kamal Kishore Arora v. Department Of Industrial Policy & ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-lic-policy-records-2021\|LIC policy-holder records — CIC]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-thomas-mathew-v-department-of-defence-2023-726952\|Thomas Mathew v. Department Of Defence — CIC 2023]] (CIC 2023)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/10282241/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-8}}

Kamal Kishore Arora v. Department Of Industrial Policy & ...

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Tue, 05 May 2026 04:42:56 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Kamal Kishore Arora v. Department Of Industrial Policy & ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,department,of,industrial,policy)&metatag-description=(Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed. Case: Kamal Kishore Arora v. Department Of Industrial Policy & .... RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Kamal Kishore Arora v. Department Of Industrial Policy & ... ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-04-26 · CIC File No. IK/77266213
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information sought is personal//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-04-26 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/77266213 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Kamal Kishore Arora \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Department Of Industrial Policy & ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Rejected \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal against CPIO's reply dismissed
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought is personal
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	department, of, industrial, policy
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-saurav-das-v-department-of-industrial-polic-2021-216083\|Saurav Das v. Department Of Industrial Policy & ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-lic-policy-records-2021\|LIC policy-holder records — CIC]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-thomas-mathew-v-department-of-defence-2023-726952\|Thomas Mathew v. Department Of Defence — CIC 2023]] (CIC 2023)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gita-dewan-verma-v-department-of-agriculture-amp-2023-176042\|Gita Dewan Verma v. Department Of Agriculture & ... — CIC 2023]] (CIC 2023)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-anil-yadav-v-department-of-personnel-amp-tr-2021-383540\|Anil Yadav v. Department Of Personnel & Training — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/77266213/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}

Gita Dewan Verma v. Department Of Agriculture & ... — CIC 2023

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 09:02:02 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Gita Dewan Verma v. Department Of Agriculture & ... — CIC 2023,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §8,department,of,agriculture,&)&metatag-description=(Gita Dewan Verma v. Department Of Agriculture & ... — CIC 2023 - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated.)}}
	+
	+	====== Gita Dewan Verma v. Department Of Agriculture & ... — CIC 2023 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2023-08-29 · CIC File No. IK/176042978
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Gita Dewan Verma v. Department Of Agriculture & ... — CIC 2023. RTI Wiki — citizen-first guide with the procedure, fee, timeline, sample format, and Section 19 escalation if your application is delayed.
	+
	+	//Information sought is personal//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2023-08-29 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/176042978 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Gita Dewan Verma \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Department Of Agriculture & ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Rejected \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal and complaint disposed of
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought is personal
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	department, of, agriculture, &
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-anil-yadav-v-department-of-personnel-amp-tr-2021-383540\|Anil Yadav v. Department Of Personnel & Training — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-tinoo-joshi-v-department-of-personnel-amp-tr-2021-770386\|Tinoo Joshi v. Department Of Personnel & Training — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-saurav-das-v-department-of-industrial-polic-2021-216083\|Saurav Das v. Department Of Industrial Policy & ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamal-kishore-arora-v-department-of-industrial-polic-2022-772662\|Kamal Kishore Arora v. Department Of Industrial Policy & ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-rti-education-policy-2024\|NEP 2020 implementation records — CIC]] (CIC 2024)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/176042978/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-8}}

Case-Law Search — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026

anonymous@undisclosed.example.com (Anonymous) — Sun, 03 May 2026 09:02:02 +0000

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(rti case search,rti act section 8 case law search,rti section 11 cases,cic orders search,supreme court rti judgments search,filter rti rulings by section court year,adjudication intelligence)&metatag-description=(Case-Law Search — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026 - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 2026 with latest.)}}
	+
	+	====== Case-Law Search — RTI Wiki Citizen Guide 2026 ======
	+	{{url>https://righttoinformation.wiki/case-search-app.html 100%x1100px noborder\|RTI Case-Law Search}}
	+
	+	<WRAP center round help 95%>
	+	Not loading? Open it directly at [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/case-search-app.html\|/case-search-app.html]].
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	===== What this tool does =====
	+
	+	* Filter by court (SC / every HC / CIC / SIC), RTI Act section, outcome, and year range.
	+	* Search by keyword — parties' names, citation, ratio, keywords.
	+	* Landmark filter — narrow to the 38 most-cited authorities every PIO, FAA and RTI advocate should know.
	+	* One click to open the full editorial summary (with cross-links to related rulings) or the reported judgment on //Indian Kanoon// / Supreme Court Judis.
	+
	+	===== Tips =====
	+
	+	* To find //every case turning on §8(1)(j)//, pick "§8" in the sidebar filter and type ''8(1)(j)'' in the keyword box.
	+	* To find //every Delhi High Court ruling//, pick "Delhi HC" in the Court facet.
	+	* To find //rulings since DPDP 2025//, set year_from=2025 and keyword ''personal information''.
	+	* To find //applicant-friendly precedents for your First Appeal//, filter Outcome = "Applicant allowed" + Court = SC.
	+
	+	===== Reminder on citation =====
	+
	+	Every ratio shown in the search is an editorial compression of the reported judgment. Before citing in any official filing — PIO order, FAA appeal, CIC/SIC submission, High Court writ — always verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki does not warrant legal correctness for any specific dispute. Final adjudication rests with the Commission or Court.
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database home]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions:start\|Landmark case-law library (editorial)]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:faa-speaking-order-guide\|FAA Speaking-Order Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005]]
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law search adjudication}}

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) ... — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,RTI §19,chief,commissioner,of,income)&metatag-description=(Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 2026.)}}
	+
	+	====== Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-11-30 · CIC File No. IK/171711971
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Sujeet Babu Mb v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), .... RTI Wiki — citizen-first guide with the procedure, fee, timeline, sample format, and Section 19 escalation if your application is delayed.
	+
	+	//Information sought under RTI Act//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-11-30 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/171711971 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Sujeet Babu Mb \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §19(3), §2(f), §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Applicant allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Appeal allowed by the Commission
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought under RTI Act
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	chief, commissioner, of, income
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-m-suresh-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-694615\|M Suresh v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamal-aggarwal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-931004\|Kamal Aggarwal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-manoj-saini-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-494728\|Manoj Saini v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ashish-bansal-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2021-101930\|Ashish Bansal v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca) , ... — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-ravinder-kaur-v-chief-commissioner-of-income-t-2022-573570\|Ravinder Kaur v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax (Cca), ... — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=19\|All RTI cases turning on §19]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/171711971/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-8 section-19}}

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(DL, RTO, CMVR)
	+	metatag-description=(Maharashtra State Information Commission - verified citizen guide on RTI Wiki, India's independent Right to Information reference. Updated 2026 with latest amendment)}}
	+	====== Maharashtra State Information Commission ======
	+	Maharashtra State Information Commission — Driving licence delay (2017) (Maharashtra State Information Commission, 2017-06-15) //SIC-MH/2017/typology// is a ruling on the Right to Information Act, 2005 — Section 7. RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable. RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable.
	+
	+	===== Holding =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable
	+
	+	===== Ratio =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable. Maharashtra State Information Commission jurisprudence on this topic spans 2014-2025; orders apply standard RTI principles + sub-section interpretation. See linked guide for citation chain.
	+
	+	===== Section(s) applied =====
	+
	+	* Section 7
	+	* Sub-section 7(1)
	+
	+	===== Practitioner takeaway =====
	+
	+	RTO file movement disclosable; Citizen Charter enforceable
	+
	+	===== Citation =====
	+
	+	* Citation: SIC-MH/2017/typology
	+	* Court: Maharashtra State Information Commission
	+	* Date: 2017-06-15
	+	* Outcome: varied
	+	* Reporter / Cause-list: SIC-MH/2017/typology
	+
	+
	+	===== Why this case-cluster matters for citizens =====
	+
	+	This ruling sits in the Driving licence delay topic cluster — orders from various courts and Information Commissions over 2012-2025 dealing with Citizens stuck waiting for an RTO to issue / renew / transfer their driving licence. The common thread across the cluster: when the citizen is stuck and the statutory or charter timeline is exceeded, the file noting and officer-holding-the-file information must be disclosed under §6 of the RTI Act 2005, regardless of whether the underlying decision is favourable to the citizen.
	+
	+	===== Right authority to RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	Office of the Regional Transport Officer (RTO) at the relevant district + State Transport Department is the typical PIO target for an RTI on this topic. The applicable statute is Motor Vehicles Act 1988 + Central Motor Vehicles Rules (CMVR) 1989, especially Rule 14 (issue) + Rule 15 (renewal); state CMV Rules for state-specific timelines. The citizen charter / SLA is: Most states have a 21-30 day Citizen Charter for fresh DL + 7-15 days for renewal. The MoRTH model timelines are on parivahan.gov.in.
	+
	+	===== Common issues in this cluster =====
	+
	+	RTO not uploading test results to Sarathi; learner-licence to permanent-licence transition stuck; address-change pending; demerit-points dispute; touts blocking direct submissions.
	+
	+	===== Sample RTI for this topic =====
	+
	+	If your own case is stuck on a similar issue, file an RTI to the right PIO with these queries:
	+
	+	* Current status of your Driving Licence application / claim, with the date of last action.
	+	* Certified copy of the file noting recording every officer's action since submission.
	+	* Name, designation, room number, and contact of the officer currently holding the file.
	+	* The prescribed Citizen Charter / statutory timeline for disposal.
	+	* Records relating to: RTO file movement, Sarathi portal status, Citizen Charter compliance, transit pass log.
	+	* Name and contact of the First Appellate Authority for this office.
	+
	+	The fastest path: use our [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]] (free, 60 seconds) — it picks up your district and pre-fills the right authority. For voice input use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/awaaz-rti.html\|AwaazRTI]].
	+
	+	===== Citizen action steps if PIO ignores your RTI =====
	+
	+	- Day 30: silence = deemed refusal under §7(2). File a §19(1) First Appeal to the FAA — use [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]].
	+	- Day 60-90: if FAA also fails, file §19(3) Second Appeal to the State Information Commission (or CIC for central authorities).
	+	- Beyond 18 months: writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution to the High Court.
	+	- Consider parallel CPGRAMS complaint at pgportal.gov.in for service-delivery push.
	+
	+	===== Related cases in this cluster =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-cic-2014\|Driving Licence Cic 2014]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-ald-2019\|Driving Licence Hc Ald 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-ap-2019\|Driving Licence Hc Ap 2019]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-bom-2024\|Driving Licence Hc Bom 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-cal-2015\|Driving Licence Hc Cal 2015]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-del-2017\|Driving Licence Hc Del 2017]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-guj-2024\|Driving Licence Hc Guj 2024]]
	+	* [[:cases:driving-licence-hc-kar-2016\|Driving Licence Hc Kar 2016]]
	+
	+	* [[:cases\|Full RTI case-law database]] — 300+ rulings searchable by section / state / year
	+	* Companion citizen guide: [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/pmay-status-checker.html\|PMAY Status Checker]] for similar one-click portal redirects
	+
	+	===== Related on RTI Wiki =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/ai-rti-draft-app.html\|AI RTI Drafter]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/tools/first-appeal-app.html\|First Appeal Builder]]
	+	* [[:important-decisions\|Master directory of landmark RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	===== Original case metadata — Related =====
	+
	+	* [[:cases:search\|RTI Case-Law Search — full corpus]]
	+	* [[:pio-faa-knowledge-base\|PIO/FAA Knowledge Base]]
	+	* [[:pio-supreme-court-rulings\|10 landmark Supreme Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:pio-high-court-rulings\|High Court RTI rulings]]
	+	* [[:landmark-cic-decisions\|Landmark CIC decisions]]
	+	* [[:act\|RTI Act, 2005 — full text]]
	+
	+	//Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.// {{tag>rti case-law cases sic-mh 2017}}

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,life,insurance,corporation,of)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of Ind. RTI Wiki citizen guide.)}}
	+
	+	====== Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-01-18 · CIC File No. IK/196210440
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-01-18 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/196210440 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Sahdula / Santosha Devi \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Life Insurance Corporation Of India \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	life, insurance, corporation, of
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-smt-manju-devi-v-life-insurance-corporation-of-2021-550272\|Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/196210440/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §6,RTI §7,RTI §8,life,insurance,corporation,of)&metatag-description=(Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Case: Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC. RTI Wiki citizen guide.)}}
	+
	+	====== Smt. Manju Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021 ======
	+
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2021-06-01 · CIC File No. IK/55027229
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2021-06-01 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/55027229 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Smt. Manju Devi \|
	+	^ Respondent \| Life Insurance Corporation Of India \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §7(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| partly allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Considered an RTI application and the public authority response.
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Commission disposed of the appeal with directions on §10 severance and §7(1) timeline compliance.
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	life, insurance, corporation, of
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-sahdula-santosha-devi-v-life-insurance-corporation-of-2021-196210\|Sahdula / Santosha Devi v. Life Insurance Corporation Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=6\|All RTI cases turning on §6]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=7\|All RTI cases turning on §7]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/55027229/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-6 section-7 section-8}}

2026/05/05 08:44	current
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+	{{htmlmetatags>metatag-keywords=(Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra v. National Medical Commission (Nmc) — CIC 2022,Central Information Commission RTI,RTI §2,RTI §8,RTI §19,national,medical,commission,(nmc))&metatag-description=(Commission decided on appellant's appeal. Case: Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra v. National Medical Commission (Nmc). RTI Wiki — citizen-first reference.)}}
	+
	+	====== Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra v. National Medical Commission (Nmc) ======
	+	<WRAP center round info 95%>
	+	Central Information Commission · 2022-09-29 · CIC File No. IK/165500493
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+
	+
	+	Commission decided on appellant's appeal. Read the full guide on RTI Wiki — India's independent Right to Information reference.
	+
	+	//Information sought under RTI Act//
	+
	+	===== Case details =====
	+
	+	^ Court \| Central Information Commission \|
	+	^ Decided \| 2022-09-29 \|
	+	^ Citation \| CIC File No. IK/165500493 \|
	+	^ Bench \| C, I, C, , S, i, n, g, l, e, , B, e, n, c, h \|
	+	^ Petitioner \| Dr. Santosh Narayan Mehrotra \|
	+	^ Respondent \| National Medical Commission (Nmc) \|
	+	^ RTI Act sections \| §19(3), §2(f), §8(1) \|
	+	^ Outcome \| Applicant allowed \|
	+
	+	===== Outcome =====
	+
	+	Commission decided on appellant's appeal
	+
	+	===== Ratio decidendi =====
	+
	+	Information sought under RTI Act
	+
	+	===== Keywords =====
	+
	+	national, medical, commission, (nmc)
	+
	+	===== Similar cases in the corpus =====
	+
	+	//These rulings have the closest editorial ratio to this case — computed by tf-idf cosine similarity over ratio, keywords and Act sections. Useful starting points if you are researching the same point of law.//
	+
	+	* [[/cases/cic-gangaram-v-university-of-delhi-2021-155347\|Gangaram v. University Of Delhi — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-naresh-panwar-v-state-bank-of-india-2021-123611\|Naresh Panwar v. State Bank Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-samir-mathur-v-ut-of-chandigarh-2021-312227\|Samir Mathur v. Ut Of Chandigarh — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-inder-singh-v-supreme-court-of-india-2021-176092\|Inder Singh v. Supreme Court Of India — CIC 2021]] (CIC 2021)
	+	* [[/cases/cic-kamini-jaiswal-v-union-bank-of-india-2022-155317\|Kamini Jaiswal v. Union Bank Of India — CIC 2022]] (CIC 2022)
	+
	+	===== Related =====
	+
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?court=CIC\|All Central Information Commission rulings in the corpus]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=2\|All RTI cases turning on §2]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=8\|All RTI cases turning on §8]]
	+	* [[https://righttoinformation.wiki/cases/search?section=19\|All RTI cases turning on §19]]
	+	* [[:cases:search\|Full case-law search]]
	+	* [[:cases\|Case-Law Database — overview]]
	+	* [[:pio-rti-reply-guide\|PIO RTI Reply Guide]]
	+	* [[:act\|The RTI Act, 2005 — annotated]]
	+	* [[https://indiankanoon.org/doc/165500493/\|External reported text →]]
	+
	+	<WRAP center round alert 95%>
	+	Editorial summary, not a certified report. The ratio here is an editorial compression. Before citing this ruling in a PIO order, FAA speaking order, or any appellate filing, verify against the full reported decision. RTI Wiki is not a legal service.
	+	</WRAP>
	+
	+	~~NOCACHE~~
	+
	+	//Editorial summary · last reviewed 21 April 2026.//
	+
	+	{{tag>case-law court-cic section-2 section-8 section-19}}