Right to Information Wiki

Encyclopedia on RTI for everyone
You will find the Guide to Online RTI.

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: RTI Wiki » Common Terms » Third Party under RTI
explanations:third-party

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
explanations:third-party [2015/07/23 02:18] – Shrawanexplanations:third-party [2015/07/28 01:50] – Shrawan
Line 84: Line 84:
  
 Under this Act, **providing information is the rule and denial an exception**. Any attempt to constrict or deny information to the Sovereign Citizen of India without the explicit sanction of the law will be going against the rule of law. The Citizen needs to give no reasons nor are his credentials to be checked for giving the information. If the third party objects to giving the information, the Public Information Officer must take his objections and see if any of the exemption clauses of Section 8 (1) apply. If any of the exemption clauses apply, the PIO is then obliged to see if there is a larger Public interest in disclosure. If none of the exemption clauses apply, information has to be given. Under this Act, **providing information is the rule and denial an exception**. Any attempt to constrict or deny information to the Sovereign Citizen of India without the explicit sanction of the law will be going against the rule of law. The Citizen needs to give no reasons nor are his credentials to be checked for giving the information. If the third party objects to giving the information, the Public Information Officer must take his objections and see if any of the exemption clauses of Section 8 (1) apply. If any of the exemption clauses apply, the PIO is then obliged to see if there is a larger Public interest in disclosure. If none of the exemption clauses apply, information has to be given.
 +==== More Common terms under RTI ====
  
 +{{indexmenu>:explanations#1}}
  
 <WRAP left round download 90%> <WRAP left round download 90%>
Line 92: Line 94:
   - {{:explanations:sg-27022009-11.pdf|Mahesh Kumar Sharma v. PIO, Delhi Jal Board Decision}} File No: No. CIC /A T/A/2008/01262//SG/2109   - {{:explanations:sg-27022009-11.pdf|Mahesh Kumar Sharma v. PIO, Delhi Jal Board Decision}} File No: No. CIC /A T/A/2008/01262//SG/2109
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +[<>]
explanations/third-party.txt · Last modified: 2023/04/15 11:08 by Shrawan