Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- explanations:third-party [2015/07/18 02:16] – [Third Party under RTI] Shrawan
+++ explanations:third-party [2015/07/23 14:52] – Shrawan
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== Third Party under RTI ======
-The High Court of Delhi in **//Suhas Chakma v. CIC & Ors. W. P. (C) No. 9118/2009 dated 22/01/2010//** held - “**that information which involves the rights of privacy of a third party in terms of Section 8(1)(j) RTI Act cannot be ordered to be disclosed without notice to such third party. The authority cannot simply come to conclusion, that too, on a concession or on the agreement of parties before it, that public interest overrides the privacy rights of such third party without notice to and hearing such third party**”.
+The High Court of Delhi((Delhi High Court Decision: Suhas Chakma v. CIC & Ors. W. P. (C) No. 9118/2009 dated 22/01/2010)) held - “**that information which involves the rights of privacy of a third party in terms of Section 8(1)(j) RTI Act cannot be ordered to be disclosed without notice to such third party. The authority cannot simply come to conclusion, that too, on a concession or on the agreement of parties before it, that public interest overrides the privacy rights of such third party without notice to and hearing such third party**”.
@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 Under this Act, **providing information is the rule and denial an exception**. Any attempt to constrict or deny information to the Sovereign Citizen of India without the explicit sanction of the law will be going against the rule of law. The Citizen needs to give no reasons nor are his credentials to be checked for giving the information. If the third party objects to giving the information, the Public Information Officer must take his objections and see if any of the exemption clauses of Section 8 (1) apply. If any of the exemption clauses apply, the PIO is then obliged to see if there is a larger Public interest in disclosure. If none of the exemption clauses apply, information has to be given.
-<WRAP left round tip 90%>
-If you have more to add to this article, please send us the tweet at @rtiindia
-</WRAP>
@@ Line 97: / Line 92: @@
   - {{:explanations:sg-27022009-11.pdf|Mahesh Kumar Sharma v. PIO, Delhi Jal Board Decision}} File No: No. CIC /A T/A/2008/01262//SG/2109
 </WRAP>
+==== More Common terms under RTI ====
+{{indexmenu>:explanations#1}}