explanations:public-interest
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
explanations:public-interest [2017/04/14 03:27] – Shrawan | explanations:public-interest [2017/11/26 15:19] – [What is Public Interest] Shrawan | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
- the likelihood that production of the documents will affect the outcome of the case; | - the likelihood that production of the documents will affect the outcome of the case; | ||
- the likelihood of injustice if the documents are not produced | - the likelihood of injustice if the documents are not produced | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | <script async src="// | ||
+ | <ins class=" | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
The terms public interest has to be interpreted as “Redressing public injury, enforcing public duty, protecting social, collective, ‘diffused’ rights and interests vindicate public interest… [in the enforcement of which] the public or a class of the community have pecuniary interest or some interest by which their legal rights or liabilities are affected. | The terms public interest has to be interpreted as “Redressing public injury, enforcing public duty, protecting social, collective, ‘diffused’ rights and interests vindicate public interest… [in the enforcement of which] the public or a class of the community have pecuniary interest or some interest by which their legal rights or liabilities are affected. | ||
Line 23: | Line 34: | ||
The Supreme Court in Bihar Public Service Commission v. Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi (2012) 13 SCC 61((Bihar Public Service Commission v. Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi (2012) 13 SCC 61)) held that the statutory | The Supreme Court in Bihar Public Service Commission v. Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi (2012) 13 SCC 61((Bihar Public Service Commission v. Saiyed Hussain Abbas Rizwi (2012) 13 SCC 61)) held that the statutory | ||
- | //22. “The expression " | + | '' |
- | //23. The satisfaction has to be arrived at by the authorities objectively and the consequences of such disclosure have to be weighed with regard to the circumstances of a given case. The decision has to be based on **objective satisfaction recorded for ensuring that larger public interest outweighs unwarranted invasion of privacy** or other factors stated in the provision. | + | '' |
The Hon’ble High Court in its decision dated 13/ | The Hon’ble High Court in its decision dated 13/ | ||
Line 33: | Line 44: | ||
Furthermore, | Furthermore, | ||
- | //“: | + | '' |
The judgment of Hon’ble | The judgment of Hon’ble |
explanations/public-interest.txt · Last modified: 2023/04/15 11:04 by Shrawan