explanations:justification-for-denial-under-rti
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
explanations:justification-for-denial-under-rti [2017/12/29 03:11] – Shrawan | explanations:justification-for-denial-under-rti [2017/12/29 03:12] – Shrawan | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{like> | {{like> | ||
===== Central Information Commission Decisions ===== | ===== Central Information Commission Decisions ===== | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | <script async src="// | ||
+ | <ins class=" | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
- Quoting provisions of Section 8 of the RTI Act ad libitum to deny the information requested for, by CPIOs/ | - Quoting provisions of Section 8 of the RTI Act ad libitum to deny the information requested for, by CPIOs/ | ||
Line 8: | Line 20: | ||
===== Court Decisions ===== | ===== Court Decisions ===== | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | <script async src="// | ||
+ | <ins class=" | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | </ | ||
- “6. This Court is inclined to concur with the view expressed by the CIC that in W.P. (Civil) 12428/2009 order to deny the information under the RTI Act the authority concerned would have to show a justification with reference to one of the specific clauses under Section 8 (1) of the RTI Act. In the instant case ………….”(({{ : | - “6. This Court is inclined to concur with the view expressed by the CIC that in W.P. (Civil) 12428/2009 order to deny the information under the RTI Act the authority concerned would have to show a justification with reference to one of the specific clauses under Section 8 (1) of the RTI Act. In the instant case ………….”(({{ : | ||
- “If no reasons are given in the appellate orders, then it is injustice to the natural justice because quasi judicial obligations are giving reasons for order, since justice is not expected to wear the inscrutable face of a sphinx”((Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in Ibrahim Kunju v. State of Kerala AIR 1970 Ker 65)) | - “If no reasons are given in the appellate orders, then it is injustice to the natural justice because quasi judicial obligations are giving reasons for order, since justice is not expected to wear the inscrutable face of a sphinx”((Hon’ble High Court of Kerala in Ibrahim Kunju v. State of Kerala AIR 1970 Ker 65)) | ||
- | - “12………As is reflected in its preambular paragraphs, the enactment seeks to promote transparency, | + | - “12………As is reflected in its preambular paragraphs, the enactment seeks to promote transparency, |
- | + | ||
- | 13. Access to information, | + | |
in WP(C) No. 3114/2007 decided on 03.12.2007)) | in WP(C) No. 3114/2007 decided on 03.12.2007)) | ||
explanations/justification-for-denial-under-rti.txt · Last modified: 2023/04/15 10:58 by Shrawan