Quick answer. Every government school and government-aided college in India is a public authority under §2(h) of the RTI Act 2005. The Public Information Officer (PIO) is the Principal by default (or the Headmaster, in a small school). File a one-page RTI by Registered AD post with a ₹10 IPO (₹0 if BPL). You can ask for: admission status, fee receipts, scholarship credit, attendance records, faculty list, infrastructure expenditure, RTE 25% reservation compliance, and your own answer scripts (the Supreme Court settled this in Aditya Bandopadhyay v. CBSE, 2011). Reply must come within 30 days. If silent — free First Appeal to the District Education Officer; then Second Appeal to the State Information Commission.
Sushma Bhosle, 34, household help in a Pune suburb. Applied under the Right to Education Act §12(1)© — the 25% free-seat reservation for economically-weaker children — at a well-known private unaided school in Kothrud for her daughter Anvi's Class 1 admission for academic year 2026-27.
“The state lottery website showed Anvi's name allotted to that school in February 2026. I went on the date written on the allotment letter. The reception lady said 'sorry, our quota is already full, the system is wrong'. No paper, no rejection letter, just a verbal turnaway. I went three more times. The same answer. My husband said 'leave it, find another school'. But I knew the lottery number, I had the printed allotment. I went to the local social-worker NGO. They told me to file an RTI. We sent it on 4 March 2026 to the Principal of the school — by Speed Post AD, ₹10 IPO, total ₹62. Three questions: how many RTE seats were sanctioned this year, how many had been filled and against which lottery numbers, and the specific reason my daughter's allotment was being refused. The reply came on 27 March. The school admitted in writing that 6 of the 12 RTE seats were still vacant. Within a week the BEO (Block Education Officer) called the Principal in. Anvi started Class 1 on 7 April 2026. ₹62 of stamps. Not one rupee of bribe.”
—Sushma, April 2026
The Maharashtra State Information Commission alone disposed of around 4,800 education-sector RTI second appeals in 2024-25 (SIC annual report). Roughly two in three were filed against schools or colleges that had given oral refusals like Sushma's. Once the file is on paper — through an RTI — the conversation changes.
A government school, a government-aided school (most “convent” and “trust” schools that get state grants), a government degree college, a Kendriya Vidyalaya, a Navodaya Vidyalaya, an IIT, an IIM, a central university, a state university, an autonomous college, a polytechnic — every one of these is a “public authority” under §2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005.
Even private unaided schools that take RTE §12(1)© admissions are treated as public authorities for the limited purpose of those admissions — confirmed by multiple State Information Commissions including Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Delhi.
The PIO sits inside the institution, not in the district office. So your RTI travels straight to the person who can actually answer it.
A simple way to confirm: every public authority must publish its PIO and FAA names under §4(1)(b) on its website. Search “[school name] PIO RTI” or look for a “Right to Information” tab on the institution's website.
If you genuinely cannot find the address: file the RTI with the District Education Officer's office under §6(3) — the DEO must transfer it to the right school PIO within 5 days and inform you.
[Your full name]
[Your full postal address with PIN]
[Phone] · [Email]
[Date]
To,
The Public Information Officer
(The Principal)
[Full name of the institution]
[Full postal address with PIN]
Subject: RTI application under §6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005
— information regarding [admission / fee / scholarship / RTE / answer
script / etc., as applicable]
Sir/Madam,
I am a citizen of India. I request the following information under §6(1)
of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
Reference details:
- Name of student : [name]
- Class / programme / year : [Class 1 / B.A. II / etc.]
- Roll no. / admission no. : [if applicable]
- Lottery number / merit
list reference : [if applicable, e.g. RTE allotment ID]
- Period concerned : [academic year 2025-26 / 2026-27]
Information sought:
1. The total number of seats sanctioned for [class / programme] for the
academic year [year], category-wise (general / SC / ST / OBC / EWS /
RTE 25% / divyang / other), and the number filled in each category
as on date of this application.
2. The complete merit list / lottery list / counselling list under which
admissions were finalised for [class / programme], including the
seat-allotment date, the round, and the cut-off rank/score for each
category.
3. With reference to my application dated [date], please provide the
exact status of the application, the date(s) on which it was
considered, and — if rejected or kept pending — the specific clause
of the Admission Regulations / RTE Act / state notification under
which the rejection or pendency is recorded.
4. A copy of the fee structure approved by the [State Fee Regulation
Committee / UGC / AICTE / Department of Higher Education] for the
institution for the academic year [year], head-wise (tuition /
development / examination / library / lab / other), and a copy of
my fee payment ledger / receipts for the same year.
5. The status of [scholarship name, e.g. Post-Matric SC Scholarship /
National Means-cum-Merit / Pre-Matric Minority] for me / my ward,
including (a) date of forwarding by the institution to the
sanctioning authority, (b) sanction order number and date,
(c) amount sanctioned and amount credited, (d) bank account credited
into.
6. A list of teaching faculty currently posted at the institution, with
designation, qualification, mode of recruitment (regular / contract /
guest), and the sanctioned vs filled position count subject-wise as
on date of this application.
7. Details of infrastructure-grant funds received during 2024-25 and
2025-26 under [Samagra Shiksha / PM SHRI / RUSA / SSA / specify],
including the work executed, the contractor / vendor name, the bill
of quantities, and the utilisation certificate filed.
8. [If applicable — answer script] Under the principle laid down in
//Aditya Bandopadhyay v. CBSE// (2011) 8 SCC 497, please permit
inspection of and provide a certified photocopy of my evaluated
answer script(s) for the [exam name, e.g. Class 12 Board / B.Com
Sem IV] held in [month, year], roll no. [number]. I am willing to
pay the photocopy charges of ₹2 per page on intimation.
Fee: I enclose Indian Postal Order No. [number] dated [date] for ₹10
in favour of "[Accounts Officer of the institution / state-prescribed
payee]". [If BPL: I am Below Poverty Line and attach a copy of my BPL
ration card; please process this RTI without fee under §7(5).]
Mode of reply: By post and by email at [email].
Citizenship declaration: I am a citizen of India.
Thank you,
[Signature]
[Name]
After day 30, send a polite written reminder by Registered AD: “30 days have lapsed; reply due under §7(1); please dispatch within 7 days else I shall move First Appeal.” Many PIOs respond at this nudge.
These run in parallel with your RTI. Often a polite RTI reply is enough to make these grievance routes unnecessary.
+---------------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | RTI to school/college PIO | ₹10 by IPO. BPL = free. | +---------------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | Reply due (PIO) | 30 days from receipt (§7(1)). | | | 48 hours if life or liberty | | | involved — §7(1) proviso. | +---------------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | Inspection of records (e.g., admission| First hour FREE; ₹5 per | | register, fee register) | subsequent half-hour (Central | | | rules; state rules may vary). | +---------------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | Photocopy charges | ₹2 per A4 page (Central rules). | +---------------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | First Appeal under §19(1) | NIL. 30 days to file. 30+15 days | | | for FAA to decide. | +---------------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | Second Appeal under §19(3) | NIL (most states). 90 days to | | | file from FAA order. | +---------------------------------------+----------------------------------+ | Penalty on PIO under §20 | ₹250/day, max ₹25,000. | +---------------------------------------+----------------------------------+
Q. Can I ask for someone else's marks or admission record?
No — that is third-party personal information under §8(1)(j) and would be refused. You can ask for aggregated data (cut-off marks, lottery numbers admitted, list of admitted students by category) — that is institutional disclosure, not personal.
Q. The Principal says private school RTE issues should go to the State Education Department, not to the school.
The Principal is wrong. State Information Commissions (Maharashtra SIC, Karnataka SIC, Delhi SIC) have repeatedly held that for the limited scope of RTE §12(1)© admissions, the unaided school is a public authority — because it is performing a statutory function for which it receives state reimbursement.
Q. Can I get a copy of my child's CBSE/ICSE answer script?
Yes. Aditya Bandopadhyay v. CBSE is the binding Supreme Court ruling. CBSE charges ₹500-700 per script under its own scheme — but RTI route is also valid and usually cheaper. Apply within 12 months of result declaration.
Q. The PIO sent a one-line reply: “Information not maintained in this format.”
Two responses. (a) RTI doesn't require the PIO to “create” information, only to disclose what exists — so check whether you asked for raw records (allowed) or for tabulated data (may be refused). (b) If raw records exist, file First Appeal citing §19(1) and §4(1)(b) — every public authority must maintain admission, fee, attendance, and grant records under its proactive disclosure duty.
Q. The school says the document is “exam-related” so §8(1)(e) fiduciary applies.
Aditya Bandopadhyay directly addresses this. The relationship between the institution and the examinee is fiduciary in favour of the examinee — meaning the institution holds the script for the examinee's benefit. Therefore disclosure to the examinee is not breach of fiduciary trust; it is fulfilment of it.
Q. We are a tribal-area family with no IPO seller nearby. Can we attach cash?
Cash is acceptable under §6(1) but only if you walk in and obtain a stamped receipt. By post, only IPO / DD / court-fee stamp work. Easiest: get any literate friend in the nearest town to buy the IPO and post on your behalf, or apply free under BPL category if you hold a BPL card.
Q. Can I file a single RTI covering both my child's admission and fee questions?
Yes. The RTI Act does not limit the number of questions per application — many state SICs have struck down “one query per application” rules as illegal. Group related questions; pay the single ₹10 fee.
Last reviewed: 26 April 2026 by RTI Wiki editorial team. State fee rules and education-department designations change with each notification; cross-check with your state's Education Department before posting. Spotted an outdated address? Write to admin@bighelpers.in.