Mediation Settlement Not Complied With? Enforcement and Execution Action Guide

You went through mediation, both sides signed a settlement, and you thought the dispute was finally over. Now the other side is not paying, not transferring, or not doing what they promised. A signed settlement is not the end of the road if it is breached — there are clear ways to record it properly, prove the breach, and ask the court to enforce or execute it. This guide walks you through what to do, in order.

Reviewed on: 2026-05-29.

This guide is for people in India who resolved a dispute through mediation, signed a written settlement, and are now facing the other side simply not following it. That includes:

• Parties to a family or matrimonial dispute where the settlement covered maintenance, return of belongings, or property, and one side is not complying.
• People who settled a money, business, or partnership dispute in court-referred mediation and have not received the agreed payment.
• Anyone who settled through a Lok Adalat, mediation centre, or court-annexed mediation and now sees the terms ignored.
• People who signed a private settlement outside court and are unsure whether it can be enforced at all.

The core questions are the same in every case: how was the settlement recorded, what exactly was breached, and which court can enforce it? Get those three things right and the rest of the process follows.

If your dispute was a builder matter settled before a RERA authority, the enforcement route is different — see the companion guide on a RERA order the builder is not complying with. If your problem is a maintenance order rather than a mediated settlement, see maintenance ordered but payment not received.

Find your original settlement document and read it slowly, line by line. Note exactly what each side agreed to do and by when. Highlight every deadline, amount, and action. A clear understanding of the precise terms is the foundation of everything that follows.

Next, work out how the settlement was recorded. Was it reached in court-referred or court-annexed mediation and then placed before a judge who passed an order or decree? Was it a Lok Adalat award? Or was it a private agreement signed at a mediation centre with no court involvement? The answer decides which enforcement route is open to you, so write it down clearly.

Pull out any court order, decree, or award that recorded the settlement. If you do not have a certified copy, note that you will need to apply for one — it is the single most important document for enforcement.

Build a breach file. On one page, list each promise, the date it was due, and what actually happened. Beside each item, mark the proof you hold: a bank statement showing money was not received, a registry record showing a transfer never happened, photographs, messages, or simply the absence of any payment.

Gather the supporting evidence into a single folder. Collect bank statements covering the period payments were due, copies of any reminders you already sent, and any reply, partial payment, or silence from the other side. Export WhatsApp or email threads with dates visible.

Draft a short, calm written reminder to the other side recording the breach and asking them to comply within a reasonable time. Use the template later in this guide as a starting point. Even where you intend to go to court, a documented reminder shows you acted in good faith and gave them a chance.

Decide your likely route on paper. If your settlement became a court order or decree, execution to enforce the terms is usually the path. If the case was disposed of on the basis of the settlement and that settlement has now collapsed, restoration or recall of the original case may be available. If it was a purely private settlement, a fresh case on the agreement may be needed. Note which seems to fit — but treat this as a draft, not a final decision.

List the court or forum that recorded the settlement, with the case number and order date. Enforcement almost always goes back to that same court.

Line up legal help for the coming week. Contact a lawyer, or if cost is a concern, locate your nearest District Legal Services Authority for free aid. Enforcement involves drafting, court procedure, and limitation deadlines where mistakes are costly, so do not plan to file blind.

Everything turns on this. A settlement reached in court-referred or court-annexed mediation is normally placed before the court, which records it and disposes of the case through an order or decree. That recorded settlement is generally enforceable like a decree. A Lok Adalat award has its own enforcement standing. A purely private settlement signed at a centre with no court involvement behaves more like a contract — enforcing it may require a fresh case rather than execution. Read your documents and identify which category you fall into. If you are unsure, this is the first thing to ask a lawyer.

If your settlement became a court order or decree, you will need a certified copy to enforce it. Apply at the registry of the court that disposed of the case. You can usually check the case status and order details on the eCourts services portal first. If the order has not been uploaded or the status looks wrong, see our guide on a court order not uploaded online. Keep the certified copy safe — it is the spine of your enforcement application.

List each term, the date it was due, and what actually happened. For money, your bank statement is the proof. For a transfer or handover, the registry record or photographs do the job. For an action that was simply not taken, the absence of any record is itself evidence, supported by your reminders. A precise, dated breach file is far more persuasive than a general complaint that the other side “did not cooperate”.

Before rushing to court, send a calm written reminder. State the settlement, the specific term breached, and a reasonable time to comply. Send it by a method that gives you proof of delivery, such as registered post or email. This is not mandatory in every case, but it strengthens your hand and sometimes produces compliance without litigation. Use the template below as a starting point and keep a copy with the dispatch proof.

If the settlement became an order or decree, execution proceedings before the same court are the usual route to enforce money or specific terms. If instead the original case was disposed of on the basis of the settlement and that settlement has now broken down, you may be able to apply to recall or restore the original case so the dispute is decided afresh. These are different remedies with different consequences, and the right choice depends on what your disposal order actually recorded. This is exactly the kind of decision to make with a lawyer rather than alone.

Enforcement almost always goes back to the court that recorded the settlement. With your lawyer, file the execution petition or restoration application, attaching the certified order, the signed settlement, your breach file, and proof of the reminder. State clearly what you want the court to do — recover a specific sum, compel a transfer, or revive the case. A focused, well-documented application moves faster than a vague one.

Once filed, the court will issue notice to the other side and fix hearings. The other side may pay up, may contest, or may claim partial compliance. Keep updating your breach file as things develop, and bring originals when asked. Track the case on eCourts so you are never surprised by a date. If you face repeated procedural delays, our guide on using RTI for status of pending matters and the related court-records resources can help you document the delay.

Depending on the facts, additional remedies may exist — for example, where the breach involves a separate offence, or where an undertaking was given to the court. These are situation-specific and carry their own risks, so raise them with your lawyer rather than acting on assumptions. Avoid filing multiple overlapping cases without advice, as that can complicate enforcement instead of speeding it up.

Replace the text in square brackets with your own details before sending. This is a plain reminder, not a formal legal notice — have a lawyer draft a legal notice if the matter is serious.

To, [Name of the Other Party] [Address of the Other Party]

Date: [DD/MM/YYYY]

Subject: Reminder regarding non-compliance with the mediation

       settlement dated [DD/MM/YYYY]

Dear [Name],

1. We had resolved our dispute through mediation and signed a written

 settlement dated [DD/MM/YYYY]. [If applicable: This settlement was
 recorded by the [Name of Court] in [Case Number] by order dated
 [DD/MM/YYYY].]

2. Under that settlement, you agreed to the following, which remain

 unfulfilled:
 a. [Term 1 — e.g., pay Rs [Amount] by [date]];
 b. [Term 2 — e.g., transfer / hand over [item] by [date]].
 [Add rows as needed]

3. Despite the time agreed having passed, the above terms have not been

 complied with, as on the date of this letter.

4. I therefore request you to comply with the settlement in full within

 [reasonable number, e.g., 15] days of receiving this letter. If the
 terms are not complied with, I will be constrained to pursue
 enforcement before the appropriate court / forum, entirely at your
 risk as to cost and consequences.

5. I am willing to discuss a workable timeline if there is a genuine

 difficulty, provided you respond in writing within the above period.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Full Name] [Your Address] [Mobile Number] [Email Address]

Enclosures: - Copy of the mediation settlement dated [DD/MM/YYYY] - Copy of the court order / decree [if applicable]

The Right to Information Act, 2005 lets you obtain information from public authorities. It cannot enforce your settlement or order anyone to pay you, but it can support your enforcement effort in specific situations:

• Getting certified court records: Where the settlement was recorded by a court, RTI or the court's own copying procedure can help you obtain certified copies of the order, decree, or proceedings you need to file execution. Many courts have their own rules for certified copies, so use that route first and treat RTI as a backup.
• Status of a pending application: If your enforcement or restoration application is pending and you are getting no clarity, RTI to the relevant public authority can help you find out what has been recorded or done, alongside checking eCourts.
• Records where a government body is the other party: If the party that breached the settlement is a government department or public authority, RTI can be used to obtain its internal records, notings, or correspondence relevant to compliance.

To file an RTI, see our step-by-step RTI filing guide. The CPIO must respond within the period fixed under the Act. If your RTI is ignored or refused, see how to file a first appeal under RTI Section 19. For records held by government departments that are parties to a dispute, using CPGRAMS together with RTI can add a parallel grievance route, and The RTI Playbook covers deeper strategies for complex matters.

RTI has firm limits in a settlement-enforcement dispute:

• RTI cannot enforce the settlement: No RTI reply will compel the other side to pay or perform. Only the court that recorded the settlement can enforce it through execution or restoration.
• A private opponent's records are out of reach: If the other party is a private individual or company, RTI does not apply to their bank statements, books, or private papers. You must obtain such proof through the court process.
• RTI does not speed up your case: RTI is not a fast track to force a quicker hearing. Court procedure, not RTI, drives the timeline of enforcement.
• Ongoing proceedings may limit disclosure: Some court or investigation records may be withheld while a matter is sub judice or under inquiry, so do not assume every record is obtainable on demand.

• Assuming a signed settlement enforces itself: A signature does not make money appear. You still have to take a recorded settlement back to the court and ask it to enforce the terms. Treat the signing as a milestone, not the finish line.
• Not checking how the settlement was recorded: A court-recorded settlement and a purely private one are enforced very differently. Skipping this question leads people to file the wrong application and lose time.
• Going to the police for a civil settlement: Police generally do not recover money or enforce civil terms. The court that recorded the settlement is the right forum, not the local station.
• Filing without a certified copy of the order: Enforcement usually needs a certified copy of the order or decree. Apply for it early so it does not hold up your application later.
• Keeping a weak or vague breach record: “They did not cooperate” is not enough. Pin down each unfulfilled term, its due date, and the proof, on a single timeline.
• Confusing execution with restoration: These are different remedies. Choosing the wrong one — or filing both without advice — can complicate matters. Decide the route with a lawyer based on what your disposal order recorded.
• Ignoring limitation periods: Enforcement and execution are time-bound. Sitting on a breach for too long can weaken or defeat your claim. Act promptly and confirm the deadline with a lawyer.
• Trying to handle a serious matter entirely alone: For anything beyond a tiny, simple amount, get a lawyer or free legal aid. The cost of advice is small next to the value of the remedy you could lose.

If your settlement related to a family property arrangement, also read our guide comparing a family settlement deed versus a partition deed. If the dispute was an employment full-and-final settlement, see a delayed full and final settlement. For a loan one-time settlement that is not being honoured by a lender, see the loan settlement process in India.

• eCourts Services (ecourts.gov.in) — Check case status, order dates, and cause lists for district and taluka courts
• NALSA (nalsa.gov.in) — National Legal Services Authority; find your District Legal Services Authority for free legal aid and Lok Adalat information
• Department of Justice (doj.gov.in) — Information on courts, legal aid, and access-to-justice schemes
• RTI Online (rtionline.gov.in) — File an RTI application to Central public authorities online
• CPGRAMS (pgportal.gov.in) — Lodge a grievance against a government department that is a party

It depends on how the settlement was recorded. A settlement reached in court-referred or court-annexed mediation, once recorded by the court and reflected in a decree or order, is generally enforceable like a decree. A purely private settlement signed outside any court process is treated more like a contract — you may have to file a fresh case to enforce it. The exact status varies with the type of mediation and the forum, so check your settlement document and have a lawyer confirm its legal character.

Executing means asking the court to enforce the terms — for example, recovering money or compelling a transfer — usually through execution proceedings once the settlement has become an order or decree. Recalling or restoring the case means asking the same court to revive the original dispute because the settlement that ended it has broken down. Which route fits depends on whether the case was disposed of on the basis of the settlement and what the order recorded. A lawyer can tell you which option your situation supports.

Keep the signed settlement agreement and the court order or decree that recorded it. Then build a breach file: dated proof of what was promised versus what was actually done, bank statements or payment records showing missed payments, written reminders or notices you sent, and any reply or silence from the other side. A clear timeline of who was supposed to do what by when, and what did not happen, is the core of a strong enforcement application.

Generally no. A mediation settlement is a civil matter, and the police do not recover money or enforce civil terms on your behalf. The correct route is the court that recorded the settlement, through execution or restoration. The police may get involved only if the breach also involves a separate criminal offence, such as cheating or breach of an undertaking given to the court — and even then, that is a separate process from civil enforcement.

Yes. Enforcement and execution are subject to limitation periods under the law, and these differ depending on whether you are executing a decree, filing a fresh suit on a contract, or seeking restoration. Delay can weaken or defeat your claim. Because the applicable period varies with the nature of the settlement and forum, do not assume you have unlimited time — act promptly and confirm the deadline with a qualified lawyer.

For small, simple money settlements some people manage parts of the process themselves, but enforcement and execution involve court procedure, drafting, limitation, and the choice between execution and restoration. Getting these wrong can cost you the remedy. Engaging a lawyer, or seeking free aid from your District Legal Services Authority if you cannot afford one, is strongly advisable before filing anything.

RTI cannot enforce a settlement or order anyone to pay you — it is only a tool to obtain information held by public authorities. It can help you get certified copies of court orders, find out the status of a pending application, or obtain records held by a government department that is a party. The actual enforcement must happen through the court that recorded the settlement, not through RTI.