If your health insurer marks a grievance as resolved or closed without ever giving you a real, reasoned answer, here is a calm weekend plan to reopen it, demand a written reply, and escalate.
Reviewed on: 2026-05-29.
When a health insurer marks your grievance closed but never actually answers it, the fight starts with getting a written, reasoned reply on the record.
Quick answer
If a health insurer or its TPA closes your grievance as ‘resolved’ without actually answering it — an auto-close for ‘no response’, a one-line boilerplate that ignores your real question, or a status flipped to closed on the portal with no written decision — the first move is to put the gap on record in writing. Reply to the closure message and state plainly that your grievance is not resolved, that no reasoned reply was given, and ask them to reopen it and answer the specific points: the exact ground for the claim decision and the policy clause relied on. Keep a clean file: your original grievance, the closure message, screenshots of the portal status, and your policy. If the insurer still will not give a substantive answer, you escalate — not with RTI, but through the insurer’s Grievance Redressal Officer, then IRDAI’s Bima Bharosa portal, then the Insurance Ombudsman, and a consumer commission if needed.
Whether RTI helps depends entirely on who holds the record. RTI works only when a public body is involved — a public-sector (government) insurer, a government health scheme such as CGHS or ECHS, or the regulator IRDAI itself about how a complaint on its portal was handled. RTI does not reach a private insurer or a private TPA, and it never forces a payout or reopens a claim. For a private health-insurance dispute, the insurance grievance chain is your real remedy.
This guide is for you if a health insurer or its TPA has shut a grievance without giving you a genuine answer. Common situations:
Capture the closure exactly as it stands and reopen it in writing. Open the insurer or TPA email, SMS, claim portal status, or the grievance-closure note, and read precisely what they say was the ‘resolution’.
Build the file that shows the answer is missing. Lay your original grievance next to the closure message, so it is obvious the question asked was never addressed.
Draft your written representation to the insurer’s Grievance Redressal Officer using the template below. Keep it calm and factual: you are not re-arguing the whole claim yet, you are demanding a reasoned, written reply to a grievance that was closed without one.
| Document or evidence | Why it matters / where to get it |
|---|---|
| Your original grievance / complaint | The exact text and date of what you raised, so you can show the specific question that was never answered when the grievance was closed. |
| The closure or 'resolved' message | The insurer's or TPA's email, SMS or portal note saying the grievance is resolved or closed; this is the document your whole representation challenges. |
| Dated screenshots of the portal status | Screen captures showing the grievance marked 'resolved' or 'closed' with dates, in case the status is changed or the record later differs from what you saw. |
| The underlying claim decision or deduction letter | The original rejection, deduction or claim-settlement letter you were complaining about; the unanswered point usually concerns the reason or clause in it. |
| Policy schedule and wording | Your policy document shows what is actually covered and which clauses can lawfully apply, so you can pin the insurer to a specific, real ground. |
| A short dated timeline you write yourself | A one-page sequence of the claim decision, your grievance, and the closure keeps the missing-answer problem crystal clear at every later level. |
| Proof you did respond (if auto-closed) | If the grievance was closed for 'no response', any email, call log or delivery record showing you did reply, or that their message never reached you. |
| Grievance / complaint reference numbers | The grievance ID, claim number and TPA reference; you need them to reopen, to follow up, and to escalate to the GRO and IRDAI. |
| Step | Who to approach | How to reach them | Typical timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insurer grievance / customer-care team | The health insurer or its TPA that closed your grievance | Written reply to the closure asking to reopen it and for a reasoned answer with the policy clause; request a reference number | First reply usually in a few days to a couple of weeks |
| Insurer's Grievance Redressal Officer | The GRO named in your policy and on the insurer's website | Email or letter escalating the grievance closed without a reasoned reply, with your full file | A couple of weeks |
| IRDAI Bima Bharosa | Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India grievance portal | Register at bimabharosa.irdai.gov.in and keep the token to track it; note the earlier closure without answer | As per the portal's published timeline |
| Insurance Ombudsman | Office of the Insurance Ombudsman for your area | File through cioins.co.in within the limit set by the Insurance Ombudsman Rules; free for policyholders | A few weeks to a few months |
| National Consumer Helpline | Department of Consumer Affairs helpline | Register at consumerhelpline.gov.in, the UMANG app, or by phone | A few days to acknowledge; mediation varies |
| Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission | District or State Consumer Commission | File online on e-Daakhil at edaakhil.nic.in with your full evidence | Varies by location and case load |
Adapt the bracketed parts. Keep a copy of everything you send.
Subject: Grievance closed without a reasoned reply — reopen and answer: grievance ref [grievance/complaint number], claim no. [claim number], policy no. [policy number]
To: The Grievance Redressal Officer [Insurance company name] (through TPA [TPA name], if applicable) Subject: Grievance ref [grievance/complaint number] was marked resolved/closed without a reasoned reply — request to reopen and answer in writing Dear Sir / Madam, I am the policyholder/insured under the above health policy. On [date] I raised grievance ref [grievance/complaint number] in connection with claim no. [claim/intimation number]. On [date] I found this grievance marked [resolved / closed] on your records, but I have not received any reasoned reply that actually answers it. What I had asked: [state your original grievance in one or two lines, e.g. the exact ground and policy clause on which [amount] was deducted/rejected]. What I was told at closure: [paste the exact closure message / 'resolved' line you received, or write 'no written decision or reason was given']. Why the closure is not a resolution: - My specific question above has not been answered, and no policy clause has been cited for the decision I complained about. - [If auto-closed for 'no response':] I did not receive any message requiring a response from me; please share proof of the message you say was sent, as I am attaching proof that I remained in contact. - A grievance cannot be treated as resolved when the policyholder has been given no reasoned, written reply. I therefore request you to (a) reopen grievance ref [grievance/complaint number], and (b) send me a written, reasoned reply that answers my specific point and cites the exact policy clause relied on, with a fresh acknowledgement and reference number. If I do not receive a satisfactory written resolution, I will be constrained to escalate to IRDAI's Bima Bharosa portal, the Insurance Ombudsman, and, if necessary, the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. I am attaching my original grievance, the closure/'resolved' message, screenshots of the portal status, the underlying claim decision, my policy schedule, and a short timeline. Thank you. Name: [your name] Policy number: [number] Claim/intimation number: [number] Grievance/complaint reference: [number] Mobile: [number] Email: [email] Date: [date]
RTI is genuinely useful here only when a public authority holds the record, and even then as an evidence and pressure tool, not as a way to force a payout or reopen a claim. The real openings are:
These answers carry weight at the Insurance Ombudsman or a consumer commission, because they show the official record of how your grievance was actually handled next to the empty ‘resolved’ tag you were given.
For the most common situation — a private health insurer or a private TPA closing your grievance — RTI does not apply, because neither is a public authority under the RTI Act. You cannot RTI a private insurer for its grievance file, and RTI will never compel anyone to reopen a complaint, give a reasoned reply, or pay your claim.
For a private health-insurance dispute, use the insurance grievance chain instead: a written representation to the insurer’s Grievance Redressal Officer, then IRDAI’s Bima Bharosa portal (bimabharosa.irdai.gov.in), and then the Insurance Ombudsman (cioins.co.in), which is free for policyholders. Because health cover is a paid service, you can also take a clear case of a grievance closed without any reasoned reply to the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission via e-Daakhil (edaakhil.nic.in), or log it with the National Consumer Helpline (consumerhelpline.gov.in). Note that CPGRAMS (pgportal.gov.in) is for government departments and public-sector bodies — it fits a public-sector insurer or a government scheme, not a purely private insurer.
It means the insurer or TPA has marked your complaint as resolved or closed on its records, but never gave you a reasoned, written reply that addresses your actual point. It can be a boilerplate 'your grievance is addressed', an auto-close for 'no response', or a portal status flipped to closed. A closure with no reasoned answer is not a real resolution.
Save dated screenshots of the grievance status and the closure message exactly as they stand, then reply in writing that the grievance is not resolved because no reasoned reply was given, and ask for it to be reopened. Pin down the single question that was never answered, for example the exact ground and policy clause used, so your follow-up is sharp.
No. RTI never compels an insurer to reopen a complaint, give a reasoned reply or pay a claim, and for a private insurer it does not even apply. RTI only gives you information, and only from a public authority. To actually get a real answer, use the insurer's Grievance Redressal Officer, IRDAI's Bima Bharosa portal, the Insurance Ombudsman, and, if needed, a consumer commission.
RTI helps when a public body holds the record: a public-sector (government) insurer, for the grievance file and the recorded reason for closure; a government scheme like CGHS or ECHS, for its grievance noting; or the regulator IRDAI, about how a complaint you raised on its Bima Bharosa portal was registered and disposed. It builds evidence you can use at the Ombudsman or a consumer forum.
Only if they genuinely sent you a message that needed a reply and you did not respond. If you never received any such message, say so in writing, ask the insurer to share proof of what they sent, and attach your own proof that you stayed in contact. Then ask for the grievance to be reopened and properly answered.
First, just the closure. Your immediate point is narrow and strong: a grievance was shut without any reasoned, written reply. Ask them to reopen it and answer your specific question with the exact policy clause. Keep the full claim arguments ready for Bima Bharosa, the Ombudsman or a consumer commission if the insurer still refuses to engage.
Escalate in writing to the insurer's Grievance Redressal Officer, then register on IRDAI's Bima Bharosa portal and keep the token to track it, noting that an earlier grievance was closed without a reasoned reply. If still unresolved, approach the Insurance Ombudsman through cioins.co.in within the time limit in the Ombudsman Rules, and you can also file before a consumer commission on e-Daakhil.
Keep your original grievance, the closure or 'resolved' message, dated screenshots of the portal status, the underlying claim decision or deduction letter, your policy schedule and wording, your grievance and claim reference numbers, any proof you did respond, and a short dated timeline. These are needed at every escalation level and before the Ombudsman or a consumer commission.