Reviewed on: 2026-06-12.
Direct answer: Under Section 17 of the RERA Act, 2016, the builder must execute a registered conveyance deed transferring the land and building title to your society or association. Where no state law fixes a different period, this must happen within three months of the occupancy certificate. If the builder stalls, your society can send a written demand, then file a complaint with the state RERA authority. In Maharashtra, societies have a second weapon: deemed conveyance under MOFA, where the District Deputy Registrar can order conveyance without the builder's signature.
This guide covers only the conveyance deed. If your problem is that the society or association itself has not been formed yet, read builder not forming the society first, because conveyance is made in favour of a registered legal body.
Until conveyance, the land stays in the builder's name. Your society maintains the building but does not own it. That blocks redevelopment, makes it harder to raise loans for major repairs, and lets the builder keep using leftover development rights on your plot. Many societies discover the gap only ten or fifteen years later, when redevelopment talks begin. The earlier you push, the cheaper and simpler it is.
Section 17(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 puts two duties on the promoter of a registered project:
The duty is the builder's, not yours. You do not have to “apply” for conveyance. You only have to be a registered society or association ready to receive it, and to pay the stamp duty and registration costs that fall on members under your agreements.
Knowing the usual excuses helps you answer them in writing:
Maharashtra is the one state with a tested statutory shortcut. Under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (MOFA), if the promoter fails to convey, the society can apply in the prescribed form (Form VII) to the competent authority, who is the District Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies for the district. The usual process is:
Two practical points. First, deemed conveyance can proceed even if the builder never obtained an OC, which rescues many older buildings. Second, budget for stamp duty adjudication: stamp duty already paid on members' individual agreements is normally adjusted, so the society often pays only a marginal amount, but the adjudication step itself takes time.
The builder is a private party and not covered by RTI. But the records that decide your conveyance case sit with public authorities:
File through RTI online or the relevant state RTI portal. If the PIO does not reply in 30 days, use a first appeal.
Section 17 fixes the builder's duty at three months from the OC, but societies have obtained conveyance and deemed conveyance decades after completion. Do not let the builder argue delay against you; still, act early because evidence gets harder to collect.
The builder can ask for legitimate amounts under the agreements, such as stamp duty and registration costs that fall on purchasers. A lump-sum “conveyance charge” with no contractual basis can be disputed in your RERA complaint.
In Maharashtra, yes, deemed conveyance does not require an OC. Elsewhere, a RERA complaint can seek both the OC and conveyance, since both are promoter duties.
No. It is a MOFA mechanism. Other states rely on Section 17 of RERA, apartment ownership acts, and the consumer or civil route.
Usually the purchasers collectively, but duty already paid on individual flat agreements is normally adjusted on adjudication. Get the deed adjudicated before registration.
For your registered phase or wing with its own OC, no. Each registered project carries its own Section 17 duty. Put the OC date in writing and start the demand.
Download the conveyance deed demand checklist (PDF).