Reviewed on: 2026-06-12.
Direct answer: a bank cannot keep your account open against your will, and charges that accrue after you handed in a valid closure request are the bank's problem, not yours. Submit a written closure request, get it acknowledged with a date, clear the genuine pre-conditions once (mandates, linked products, instruments), and demand reversal of every charge debited after that date. If the bank does not close the account and reverse the post-request charges within 30 days, file with the RBI Integrated Ombudsman at cms.rbi.org.in. Continuing to debit charges on an account the customer has asked to close is a standard deficiency-of-service ground.
The dated acknowledgement is the hinge of the whole case. Before it exists, the bank can say you never asked. After it exists, every non-maintenance charge, SMS charge, or debit card fee that posts is evidence against the bank.
Two regulatory positions defeat the most common charge traps, and quoting them in writing changes the conversation at the counter.
Neither rule replaces closure. They clean up the balance so the account can close at nil.
Do not pay a disputed negative balance just to make the closure happen. Ask in writing for a date-wise breakup of how the balance went below zero. Strip out charges barred by the two RBI rules above and charges levied after your closure request. What remains, if anything, is the real figure. Get the waiver or the final figure confirmed in writing first, because a “negative balance” can otherwise follow you into collection calls or bureau remarks. If the account was converted to a chargeable product without your consent, which is how many salary accounts start bleeding, see account converted to a paid product without consent and wrong salary account conversion.
Only as a side tool, and only for public sector banks. You can ask the bank's Public Information Officer for the policy and circular governing closure timelines and charge waivers, the date your closure request was logged, and the noting on why it is pending. That record makes an Ombudsman complaint sharper. Private banks, small finance banks and payments banks are outside the RTI Act entirely. Either way, RTI cannot close the account or refund a rupee; the grievance ladder does that. Filing basics are at how to file an RTI online.
Most banks close free after the account is about a year old; some charge if you close within the first year. The fee must appear in the bank's published schedule of charges. If a closure fee is quoted that you cannot find in the schedule, ask in writing which tariff entry authorises it.
Policies differ, but most banks now accept closure at any branch or through a signed form sent by post, and several accept video or app-based closure for fully KYC-verified accounts. Ask for the bank's closure process in writing; “home branch only” stated nowhere in policy is itself escalation material.
That is the most expensive option. Charges keep accruing, the balance goes negative, and years later the figure surfaces during a loan application. Spend the one visit needed to close it formally.
The schedule justifies a charge on a live, serviced account. It does not justify charges on an account you formally asked to close, nor charges that breach the two RBI rules above. Escalate with the acknowledgement date as your anchor, and let the Ombudsman weigh the timeline.
Cancel the mandate at the merchant end and ask the bank in writing to disable the specific NACH or AutoPay mandate by its UMRN. If debits continue after a card was replaced or blocked, the pattern in auto-debit continues after card replacement applies.
That is a duplicate ledger posting, a separate problem with a faster fix. See duplicate debit entry reversal.
Download the account closure and charge reversal checklist (PDF).