Reviewed on: 2026-06-12.
In January 2026, a student from Jalandhar paid an education agent Rs 4,20,000 in three UPI and bank transfers for admission to a public college in Canada. The agent sent an offer letter and a fee receipt showing Rs 2,80,000 “remitted” to the college. Before booking flights, the student's cousin emailed the college's admissions office using the address on the college's own website. The reply came in two days: no such offer was ever issued, and no fee was received. The family filed a complaint on cybercrime.gov.in the same evening and called 1930. Because the last transfer was only nine days old, the bank placed a lien on Rs 1,80,000 still sitting in the agent's account. An FIR for cheating and forgery followed at the local police station, and a consumer complaint on e-Daakhil sought the full refund with compensation. Recovery so far: Rs 1,80,000 frozen, the rest under police attachment proceedings.
Three moves made that outcome possible: verifying directly with the institution, reporting within days so the money trail was still warm, and never letting the agent “fix” anything. Here is how to run the same play.
Find the official website of the university or college named on the document. Use only the admissions or registrar contact listed there, not any number or email the agent supplied. Quote your name, the application or reference number, and attach the document. Ask one plain question: did your office issue this? Get the answer in writing. That written denial is the spine of the FIR, the bank dispute, and the consumer case. For foreign institutions, the international admissions office answers such emails routinely; for Indian public institutions, an RTI gives you a certified answer, covered below.
Forgery of documents and cheating are offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. If any part of the dealing was online, which it almost always is, file on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal at cybercrime.gov.in or call the helpline 1930. Speed matters for one hard reason: banks can freeze money in the receiving account only while it is still there. Reports within days recover money; reports after months recover paper. For a local walk-in agency, also lodge a written complaint at the police station with jurisdiction and insist the FIR records the forged document, the amounts, and the account numbers.
The FIR punishes; it does not refund. For your money:
If a forged document has gone, or was about to go, to a visa authority, stop every pending submission. A detected forgery can bring a refusal and a multi-year ban even when the applicant did not know, so the order of steps matters. Keep dated proof that you discovered and reported the fraud, and take advice from a registered immigration adviser of the destination country on how to disclose it. Do not quietly resubmit a corrected file.
RTI does not touch the private agent, but it nails the forgery when a public institution is named on the paper. File with the PIO of the government college or public university asking: whether any seat was allotted in your name against application number X, whether any fee was received against receipt number Y, and for a copy of the admission record, if any, in your name. A PIO's certified “no record exists” is court-grade proof that the receipt is bogus. Use how to file RTI online, and if the reply stalls, the first appeal route.
The state wrinkle: in Punjab, where much of this fraud is concentrated, travel and education agents must hold a licence under the Punjab Travel Professionals (Regulation) Act, 2014, and the deputy commissioner's office maintains the licence list. An RTI or even a written query to the DC office tells you whether your agent was licensed at all. Unlicensed operation is a separate offence and strengthens the FIR. Haryana and some other states have similar registration laws; check the state RTI portal directory for the right channel.
No. Genuine offers are verifiable with the institution from day one. “It will reflect later” is the standard holding line of document fraud. Verify independently today.
Send the written refund notice, but do not hand over the originals, do not delete chats, and do not signal which evidence you hold. Confrontation before the bank freeze only speeds up the emptying of the account.
Harder, not gone. Any receipt, witness, chat reference to the cash, or CCTV at the office supports it. The FIR can still record the full amount, and the consumer commission weighs the whole evidence picture.
Yes. The crime, the agent, the payments, and you are in India; the portal covers the fraud regardless of which country's institution was forged. The foreign institution's email denial is acceptable supporting evidence.
Escalate in writing to the Superintendent of Police or Commissioner with the acknowledgement copy. If an FIR is still refused, a complaint to the Magistrate seeking registration is the legal route; take a lawyer at that stage.
Yes. The refund claim for deficient service and the criminal prosecution are independent. Commissions regularly order refunds while the FIR is under investigation.
Verify the institution's authorised representative list on its official website, check the state licence where a law like Punjab's applies, insist on payments only to the institution's own account for tuition, and treat any agent who collects tuition into a personal or firm account as a red flag.
Download the forged admission document action checklist (PDF).