Quick answer. Do not randomly change Aadhaar, PAN, passport and bank records one by one. First decide which record is the “source of truth” for the transaction that failed. Then correct only the record that is blocking the workflow, save proof, and escalate with a written grievance. Use RTI only when a public authority is holding the record or refusing to tell you the reason.
The same citizen problem appears in many forms:
RTI Wiki already has separate guides for these situations. This page is the bridge between them: one repair map, with links to the deeper article when your case needs detail.
| What failed | Usually means | Start here |
|---|---|---|
| PAN-Aadhaar link failed | PAN and Aadhaar demographics do not match exactly, or fee/link status is pending | PAN-Aadhaar linking guide · PAN inoperative fix |
| Mutual fund KYC rejected | KRA has old address/name/PAN-Aadhaar status or needs fresh OVD/video KYC | Mutual fund KYC rejected guide |
| DigiLocker cannot fetch PAN, marksheet or certificate | Source issuer database does not match Aadhaar, or issuer API is failing | DigiLocker issuer reality · DigiLocker documents not showing |
| Passport file on hold | RPO/police verification needs address, name, father's name or adverse-report clarification | Passport police verification delayed |
| Bank/broker/wallet KYC failed | Private platform is comparing PAN, Aadhaar XML, CKYC or KRA data | Use grievance first; RTI only if a public authority record is involved |
| Government certificate rejected | State issuer record is old, misspelled, not digitised or not pushed to DigiLocker | RTI the issuing department after portal grievance |
Do not assume Aadhaar is always the record to change. In many cases, Aadhaar is only the authentication key. The failed system may be comparing against PAN, school board records, passport file, KRA data, EPFO, state revenue records or an old bank profile.
Many automated KYC systems are weak at Indian naming patterns. They treat “R Ravi”, “Ravi R”, “Ravi Raman” and “Raman Ravi” as different people even when the documents clearly refer to the same person.
Use this practical rule:
RTI is powerful when the record is with a public authority. It is weak when the dispute is only with a private bank, broker, wallet, AMC, employer or app.
Use RTI for:
Do not start with RTI for:
For private entities, use written grievance first, then regulator/ombudsman route where available. For mutual funds, start with the KRA/AMC correction flow and SEBI SCORES if ignored.
Subject: Request for information regarding rejection / mismatch in [PAN / Aadhaar / DigiLocker / passport / certificate] record Under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, I request the following information: 1. The present status of my correction / verification / application request bearing acknowledgement number [number]. 2. The exact reason recorded for rejection, mismatch, hold or non-fetch of my record. 3. The name/designation of the office or database from which the mismatch was detected. 4. The list of documents required to correct the mismatch. 5. The maximum time prescribed by rule, SOP, citizen charter or office instruction for deciding such correction requests. 6. A copy of the relevant rule, SOP, circular or office instruction used to process such correction requests. 7. The date on which my request was received by the concerned section and the date on which it was last acted upon.
Use the AI RTI Drafter if you want the above converted into a cleaner authority-specific draft. If the PIO rejects or ignores the request, move to the First Appeal Builder.
Change the record that is wrong for the failed workflow. If PAN-Aadhaar linking is the failed workflow, both records must match exactly. If DigiLocker cannot fetch a marksheet, the school board database is usually the correction point.
Usually no. DigiLocker fetches from the issuer. RTI the issuer for why your record is missing, not DigiLocker alone.
Not to a private bank under RTI. Ask the bank for the exact reason in writing, then use its grievance channel and regulator route. Use RTI only if the bank is a public authority or the mismatch is in a government record.
For human review, often no. For automated KYC, yes. A missing middle name, expanded initial, swapped first/last name or DOB format issue can block onboarding.
Save the rejection screenshot and compare the exact fields across PAN, Aadhaar, passport, bank/KRA and issuer records. Do not make blind corrections.