In April 2026, Ramesh Kumar from Jabalpur received a WhatsApp message claiming he had won ₹25 lakh in the “KBC Lotto 2026” and paid ₹47,000 in “processing fees” before realizing no legitimate lottery demands advance payment.
Citizen Crisis Response Network
This page is maintained as a public-service resource by the Citizen Crisis Response Network, which helps Indian citizens respond to fraud, unfair trade practices, and rights violations using RTI, consumer law, and criminal remedies. All legal references are checked against current statute. If you are a scam victim reading this within 72 hours of payment, do not close your browser—follow the checklists below immediately.
KBC scams are cyber-enabled lottery frauds where criminals impersonate the television programme “Kaun Banega Crorepati” via SMS, WhatsApp, or phone calls, falsely claiming the victim has won a prize and demanding advance payment for “taxes,” “processing fees,” or “registration.” Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (BNS), advance-fee cheating that induces delivery of property is punishable under section 318(4) (up to seven years), impersonation under section 319, and where a computer or communication device is used, under the Information Technology Act 2000 section 66D. Victims can file a zero-FIR at any police station under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS) section 173, lodge a cyber-crime complaint on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (cybercrime.gov.in), and file a consumer complaint under the Consumer Protection Act 2019 for service deficiency by payment intermediaries if a chargeback is denied.
The “KBC lottery scam” exploits the trust equity of Sony Entertainment Television's flagship quiz show, hosted by Amitabh Bachchan. Fraudsters send bulk messages via WhatsApp Business API, cloned numbers, or SMS gateways, congratulating recipients on winning prizes ranging from ₹5 lakh to ₹2 crore. Messages often include:
Once the victim calls, a well-scripted operator—sometimes using voice-modulation software to mimic celebrity voices—confirms the win, creates urgency (“offer valid for 48 hours”), and directs payment via UPI, NEFT, cryptocurrency wallets, or gift cards (Amazon Pay, Google Play). Scammers commonly use mule accounts (opened with stolen KYC), making fund tracing difficult.
Real mechanics:
Warning — If any “lottery” asks for advance payment, it is fraudulent. Under the Lotteries (Regulation) Act 1998 only State-authorised lotteries are lawful, and the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act 1978 bans money-circulation schemes. Legitimate prize winnings have any TDS deducted at source by the payer; a genuine winner never pays a fee before receiving the prize.
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (which replaced the IPC) covers KBC scams under several sections:
| Provision | Offence | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| BNS 318(4) | Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property | Imprisonment up to 7 years + fine |
| BNS 319 | Cheating by personation | Imprisonment up to 5 years + fine |
| BNS 336 | Forgery (fake KBC letterheads, logos) | Imprisonment up to 2 years + fine |
| BNS 318(2) | Cheating (simple) | Imprisonment up to 3 years + fine |
| BNS 61 | Criminal conspiracy to cheat | Punishable as for the offence conspired at |
Information Technology Act 2000 (still in force) adds:
Additionally, the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act 1978 prohibits any money-circulation or lottery-like scheme demanding payment to claim prizes.
Most citizens miss this — Additional cognizable sections can be invoked even after the initial FIR. Ask the Investigating Officer in writing to add the relevant BNS / IT Act provisions, or file a supplementary complaint, and the investigation can proceed on the wider set of charges under the applicable BNSS provisions.
If you have already paid money to a KBC scam, time is critical. Funds move through mule accounts within hours.
Do not pay any “refundable security deposit” or “last clearance fee.” Scammers often pose as “advocates” or “RBI officers” after the first payment.
Under BNSS 2023 section 173, any police station must register an FIR for a cognizable offence (including cheating under BNS 318), and a zero-FIR can be filed irrespective of where the offence occurred. The FIR is then transferred to the jurisdictional Cyber Crime Cell. Carry:
Do this immediately — If the police refuse to register the FIR, use BNSS 2023 section 173(4): send the substance of your complaint, in writing and by post, to the Superintendent of Police concerned, who must either investigate or direct an investigation. If that does not work, you may approach the jurisdictional Magistrate under BNSS section 175(3).
If payment was made via credit card or UPI, raise a dispute/chargeback with your bank as early as possible under the RBI's customer-protection framework on unauthorised and fraudulent transactions. Attach the FIR copy. Acting within the first few days materially improves the chance of recovery.
FIR drafting essentials:
Sample FIR text:
To, The Station House Officer, Cyber Crime Police Station, [City], [State] Subject: FIR against unknown persons for KBC lottery fraud Respected Sir/Madam, I, Ramesh Kumar, S/o Late Shyam Lal, aged 42, resident of 12/3 Mahavir Nagar, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh – 482001, mobile 9876543210, hereby lodge a formal complaint as follows: 1. On 15th April 2026, I received a WhatsApp message from number +91-9123456789 stating: "Congratulations! You have won ₹25,00,000 in KBC Lottery Draw 2026. Contact Mr. Sharma at 9812345678 for claim process." 2. I called the number. The person identified himself as "Advocate R.K. Sharma" and stated I must pay ₹47,000 as "Income Tax Advance" to release the prize. He sent a fake letterhead bearing Sony TV and KBC logos. 3. Under the false belief that the prize was genuine, I transferred ₹47,000 via UPI (Transaction ID: 234567890123) to account number 1234567890 (IFSC: SBIN0001234, State Bank of India, Patna branch) on 16th April 2026 at 11:30 AM. 4. Upon later verification with Sony Entertainment Television, I was informed that KBC does not conduct any lottery and the communication was fraudulent. 5. I immediately called 1930 and lodged a complaint on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. 6. The accused have committed offences punishable under: - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 sections 318(4), 319, 336 - Information Technology Act 2000 sections 66C, 66D I request you to kindly register an FIR, investigate the matter, arrest the accused, and recover the defrauded amount. Yours faithfully, Ramesh Kumar Date: 17th April 2026 Place: Jabalpur
Citizen tip — Attach a printed copy of the official fraud notice from Sony's verified website as an exhibit to strengthen your FIR. A contemporaneous corporate disclaimer warning the public against fake lotteries helps establish that the communication was fraudulent.
You can dispute unauthorised or fraudulent transactions with your bank under the RBI's customer-protection framework. Submit:
If the dispute is denied, the bank must provide a written reason, which you can use in a consumer complaint.
The Consumer Protection Act 2019 permits complaints against:
Jurisdiction:
Typical relief sought: Refund of amount + interest from the date of payment + compensation for mental agony and litigation costs, at the Commission's discretion.
Sample consumer complaint excerpt:
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JABALPUR
Complaint Case No. _______/2026
Ramesh Kumar ...Complainant
versus
1. State Bank of India, Nodal Officer, Fraud Risk Management
2. National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI)
...Opposite Parties
COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 35 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019
...The Opposite Party No. 1, despite receiving a written request on 16.04.2026 at 12:00 PM (within 30 minutes of the fraudulent transaction) to freeze account XXXXXXX1234, failed to act with due diligence. The Opposite Party No. 2, being the UPI ecosystem owner, denied the chargeback on 10.05.2026 without cogent reasons, thereby committing service deficiency under CPA 2019 section 2(11)...
PRAYER: (a) Direct OPs to refund ₹47,000 with interest; (b) Award compensation for mental agony; (c) Award costs.
Trust signal — The National Consumer Helpline (1915 / https://consumerhelpline.gov.in) offers free pre-litigation guidance and can take up grievances against service providers, including banks and payment intermediaries. Always attempt conciliation before filing a formal complaint.
If the fraudster's identity is known (e.g., a mule account holder is arrested), you can file a civil suit for money recovery—including a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 where the claim is on a recognised basis—in the competent civil court. Limitation for a suit founded on fraud generally runs from the date the fraud is discovered (see the Limitation Act 1963).
Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB)
Sony Entertainment Television operates under the broadcasting framework administered by the MIB. You can raise a complaint under the Cable Television Networks Rules 1994 if the scam exploited broadcast content (e.g., deepfake clips of Amitabh Bachchan), using the MIB's grievance channels.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) / DoT
If scam SMS/calls came from unregistered Sender IDs or spoofed numbers, file a complaint under the Telecom Commercial Communications Customer Preference Regulations 2018 via the DND service / TRAI's complaint channels (https://trai.gov.in) and the DoT's Sanchar Saathi portal (https://sancharsaathi.gov.in) for reporting suspected fraud communications.
RTI leverage:
Use the RTI Assistant drafter and PIO Reply Checker to:
Sample RTI application:
To, The Public Information Officer, Cyber Crime Wing, Madhya Pradesh Police, Police Headquarters, Bhopal – 462011 Subject: RTI application under Section 6(1) of the RTI Act 2005 1. Total number of FIRs registered under BNS section 318(4) and IT Act section 66D related to KBC / lottery scams in Jabalpur district from 1st January 2026 to 30th June 2026. 2. Number of charge-sheets filed in such cases during the same period. 3. Total monetary value defrauded in these cases and amount recovered and returned to victims. 4. Details of bank accounts frozen by Cyber Crime Wing in connection with KBC scam cases, including bank name, account number, and freeze duration. 5. Copies of all circulars issued by Cyber Crime Wing to banks regarding KBC scam prevention in 2026. Application fee: ₹10 (Cash / IPO No. XXXXXX) Applicant: Ramesh Kumar Address: 12/3 Mahavir Nagar, Jabalpur – 482001 Mobile: 9876543210 Date: 1st July 2026
Most citizens miss this — If the PIO does not reply within 30 days, file a First Appeal under RTI Act 2005 section 19(1) within 30 days of the deadline. A well-framed appeal that points to the specific statutory timelines the PIO has breached stands a strong chance of success. See RTI Act 2005 Complete Guide for templates.
Courts and consumer forums require contemporaneous evidence. Collect:
Digital evidence:
Physical evidence:
Chain of custody:
Electronic-records certificate:
To make digital evidence admissible, the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 section 63 (which replaced section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act 1872 from 1 July 2024) requires a certificate identifying the device and the process of capture and confirming that the output is authentic. Obtain this certificate in the form prescribed under section 63 of the BSA.
Do this immediately — Capture and preserve all screenshots and receipts at the earliest, before any device reset or app uninstall. In Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal (2020) 7 SCC 1, the Supreme Court held that the certificate for electronic records (then under section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act, now section 63 of the BSA) is mandatory where the original device is not produced in court—so secure the certificate early.
The following settled principles help victims of cyber-enabled lottery fraud:
Where you can complain (territorial jurisdiction). For cyber-enabled fraud, a victim can lodge the complaint and FIR where they reside or where any part of the offence occurred, not only where the fraudster or the server is located. The BNSS retains broad provisions on the place of inquiry and trial, and a zero-FIR under section 173 can be registered at any police station. In practice this means you need not travel to the fraudster's location—file at your local Cyber Crime Cell.
Misuse of a celebrity name or image. Using a celebrity's name, image, or a manipulated/deepfake clip to induce payment can amount to cheating by personation (BNS 319) and, where a computer or communication device is used, an offence under IT Act section 66D. If the scam used Amitabh Bachchan's photo or a deepfake video, those provisions can be invoked alongside BNS 318(4).
Consent obtained by deception. A payment made because the victim was deceived is not a free, informed consent; money parted with under fraudulent inducement is recoverable through criminal restitution and civil remedies. This is why voluntarily transferring money to a scammer does not bar recovery.
Citizen tip — In a consumer complaint or civil suit, frame the facts around these principles—deception, inducement, and parting with property—rather than relying on any single case citation, and let the Commission apply the binding law.
| Myth | Reality |
|---|---|
| KBC conducts a phone/SMS lottery every year | KBC has never conducted a public lottery. All contestants audition via the Sony LIV app or on-ground events. Any lottery message is fake. |
| Paying “tax clearance” secures the prize | Legitimate winnings have TDS deducted at source by the payer. No genuine winner ever pays tax before receiving the prize. |
| The fraudster's use of the Sony logo proves authenticity | Logo forgery is a criminal offence under BNS 2023 section 336 (forgery). Sony issues public notices that its trademarks are misused; check Sony's official website for the current advisory. |
| Police won't register an FIR for “small” amounts like ₹10,000 | Under BNSS 2023 section 173, police must register an FIR for all cognizable offences regardless of amount. Refusal can be escalated to the Superintendent of Police under section 173(4). |
| Only the account holder is guilty; I can't claim from the bank | A bank can be liable for service deficiency if it fails to act on a timely freeze request; consumer forums can award refunds and compensation in deserving cases. |
| Once money is transferred via UPI, it's gone forever | Reporting fast—ideally within the first hour via 1930 and cybercrime.gov.in—gives the best chance of a lien before funds are withdrawn. Even later, partial recovery is sometimes possible through investigation and court attachment. |
Sample consumer complaint (short form):
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER COMMISSION, [CITY]
Complaint No. ____/2026
[Your Name] ...Complainant
-versus-
[Bank Name / Payment Gateway] ...Opposite Party
BRIEF FACTS:
1. Complainant is a consumer of OP's banking/payment services.
2. On [Date], complainant was defrauded in a KBC lottery scam and lost ₹[Amount] via transaction ID [XXXXX].
3. Within 30 minutes, complainant called OP's helpline and requested an account freeze. OP failed to act.
4. This constitutes service deficiency under CPA 2019 section 2(11).
PRAYER:
(a) Refund ₹[Amount] with interest from [Date];
(b) Compensation for mental agony;
(c) Costs.
VALUATION: ₹[Amount + compensation]
COURT FEE: Paid via Challan No. [XXXX]
Place:
Date:
Signature of Complainant
Sample RTI to bank (leveraging the fraud-risk framework):
To, The Public Information Officer, [Bank Name], Nodal Office – Customer Service, [City] Subject: RTI application under Section 6(1) of RTI Act 2005 1. Copy of the internal SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) for freezing accounts upon receipt of cyber-fraud complaints, under the applicable RBI fraud-risk-management framework. 2. Average time taken by [Branch Name] to freeze accounts after receiving requests via helpline 1930 during January–June 2026. 3. Total number of account-freeze requests received by [Branch] in Q1 2026 for KBC scam cases, and number of requests complied with within the mandated timeline. 4. Reasons for non-compliance (if any) in cases where the freeze was delayed beyond the mandated timeline. Fee: ₹10 (IPO / Cash) Applicant: [Your Name] Address: [Full Address] Mobile: [Number] Date: [DD/MM/2026]
Trust signal — If your bank denies the chargeback, you can escalate to the RBI's Ombudsman under the Reserve Bank – Integrated Ombudsman Scheme 2021 (https://cms.rbi.org.in), which is free of cost. Complain within the time limits set out in the Scheme.
Yes. Indian police can register and investigate a cyber offence where the victim is in India, regardless of where the server or accused is located. Mention the international number in your FIR; the Cyber Crime Cell can coordinate with central agencies and, where needed, international channels.
Investigation timelines vary by case complexity and the strength of digital evidence. You can file an RTI asking the Investigating Officer's PIO for the status of the investigation periodically.
Arrest does not automatically trigger a refund. You can pursue recovery through:
Ask your investigating officer and a consumer/civil lawyer which routes apply on your facts.
Yes. The law distinguishes “voluntary” payment from “informed consent.” Where consent is obtained by deception it is not free consent, so money parted with under fraudulent inducement is recoverable through criminal restitution and civil remedies.
Report the threats to the police; criminal intimidation is a separate cognizable offence under the BNS, and you can seek police protection. Keep all threatening messages as evidence.
No. The CPA 2019 section 35 permits a complainant to appear in person. Many District Consumer Commissions have help desks. For larger or complex claims, consulting a consumer lawyer can help.
Use only the contact details published on Sony's official website (sonyliv.com / setindia.com). Treat any number sent to you in a “winning” message as fake, and verify independently through the official site rather than calling the number in the message.
The NCRP (https://cybercrime.gov.in), run by the Ministry of Home Affairs, centralises complaints and coordinates with state police. A financial-fraud complaint there, and a call to 1930, can trigger a request to the recipient bank to place a lien on the disputed funds.
The KBC scam—and lottery frauds generally—exploit information asymmetry and trust in Indian cultural icons. Recovery is possible, but prevention is superior. The Citizen Crisis Response Network urges every reader to:
For related scam types and recovery strategies, see:
Remember: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 treats cyber fraud as a serious offence. Your complaint is not a nuisance; it is a data point that helps law enforcement map criminal networks. The Consumer Protection Act 2019 arms you with fast, inexpensive forums to claim compensation from negligent intermediaries. And the RTI Act 2005 lets you audit whether the state machinery is fulfilling its duty.
Stay vigilant. Stay informed. The law is on your side—use it.