Did you know? The Right to Information is not a gift of the Act — it is inherent in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution (freedom of speech and expression). The Act of 2005 only provides the machinery to exercise that pre-existing right.
In one line. The Right to Information Act, 2005 turned a fundamental right into a usable machinery — a citizen can ask for any record held by a public authority and the authority must reply within thirty days.
What that means in practice.
Right to Information is not new. Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution gives every citizen the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression, which the Supreme Court has read to include the right to receive information from the State. The Right to Information Act, 2005 does not create the right. It creates the machinery to exercise it: the form, the fee, the deadlines, the officer, the appeal, the penalty.
Without the Act, a citizen who walked into a government office saying “Article 19 is my right, show me the file” would be thrown out. The Act gives that citizen a procedure that officers are legally bound to respect.
The Act's purpose is stated in its Preamble: to set out a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority.
In working terms: an informed citizenry keeps government honest. Transparency cuts corruption. Accountability makes the people the master, not the served.
The Act runs from Section 1 to Section 31. The working sections for a citizen are these:
For the full text see the Right to Information Act, 2005 — current text, as amended. For the section-by-section summary see the RTI Act, 2005 summary and notes.
Between 2005 and 2025 the Act moved decades of institutional practice from default secrecy to default disclosure. Landmark decisions under it have opened file notings (CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay), narrowed the “fiduciary” exemption (RBI v. Jayantilal Mistry), expanded the scope of “public authority” (Thalappalam), and applied the Act to the collegium and to party funding disclosures.
On 14 November 2025, Section 8(1)(j) was substituted via Section 44(3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (notified by the DPDP Rules, 2025). The earlier proviso — that information which cannot be denied to Parliament cannot be denied to a citizen — has been removed. The public-interest override now runs only through Section 8(2). See DPDP Rules, 2025: the amendment to Section 8(1)(j) and PIO reply after DPDP Rules, 2025.
Ready to file? See How to File RTI Online in India — 2026 Step-by-Step. Ten minutes. Ten steps. One application.
Want the law? Read the full Act or the section-by-section summary.
Got rejected? See Why RTI Applications Get Rejected and Template: first appeal.
Still have questions? The FAQ answers the twenty-five most asked.
19 April 2026