Direct answer: Yes. Under RTI Act 2005, §20(1), CIC can impose a penalty of ₹250 per day on the CPIO, up to a maximum of ₹25,000, for refusing an application without reasonable cause, not providing information within the time limit, or providing false/misleading information. CIC can also recommend disciplinary action.
Most citizens who file second appeals or complaints do not know they can specifically ask for a penalty to be imposed on the CPIO. This is one of the RTI Act's strongest enforcement tools — and it comes directly out of the CPIO's own salary.
“Yes, penalties up to Rs.25,000 may be imposed at Rs.250 daily when CPIOs refuse applications, withhold information, provide false data, or obstruct access.” — CIC FAQ Q34
The penalty of ₹250/day runs from the day the CPIO should have replied (typically day 30 from application receipt) until the date information is actually provided. The total cannot exceed ₹25,000 (which equals 100 days of penalty).
CIC may impose penalty when it finds that the CPIO:
The CPIO has the right to a hearing before any penalty is imposed (RTI Act 2005, §20(2); CIC FAQ Q33). CIC will issue notice to the CPIO and allow them to present reasons. The CPIO carries the burden of proof — §19(5) places the onus on the CPIO to prove the denial was justified.
The citizen (appellant/complainant) is not entitled to attend penalty proceedings (CIC FAQ Q31). The penalty decision is between CIC and the CPIO.
Yes. Under §20(2), if CIC finds a CPIO's failure is persistent or malicious, it can recommend disciplinary action under the applicable service rules. This goes on the CPIO's service record and can affect promotion and pay.
No. The penalty under §20(1) is deposited into the government treasury, not paid to the appellant. Separately, CIC can award compensation to you under §19(8)(b) if you suffered a specific loss or detriment.
Yes. Under RTI Act 2005, §19(8)(b), CIC can require the public authority to compensate the complainant for any loss or other detriment (CIC FAQ Q32). This is separate from the penalty.
Penalty attaches to the CPIO who held the post at the time of the violation. CIC has in practice pursued penalty against CPIOs who were transferred. Retirement does not automatically extinguish liability.
The penalty under §20 is specifically for CPIOs. However, CIC can recommend disciplinary action against First Appellate Authorities under §20(2) in appropriate cases.